Just Give Them The Truth

God, Jesus, Jesus is not God, Crucifixion, Resurrection, Bible, Paul, Christianity, Pagan

Category Archives: TRINITY Is Not Biblical

Seven Scriptures That Debunk the Trinity as a Single Being

Seven Scriptures That Debunk the Trinity as a Single Being

Seven Scripture That Debunk Trinity

The following seven scriptures show the fallacy of claiming that the Father and the Son are one being as the Trinity teaching asserts.

How can one reconcile belief in the Trinity with these simple questions?

Hebrews 1:5 tells us that Jesus was begotten by His Father. Did He beget Himself?

In Matthew 22:44, the Father said Jesus would sit at His right hand until His enemies were made His footstool. Was Jesus to sit at His own right hand?

In Matthew 24:36, when Jesus told His disciples that no one knows the day or hour of His return but the Father only, did He really know but made up an excuse to not tell them?

In John 14:28, Jesus said His Father was greater than He was. Does this mean He was greater than Himself?

In John 17:1, Jesus prayed to His Father. Was He praying to Himself?

In Matthew 27:46, Jesus cried out, “My God, My God, why have you forsaken Me?” Had He forsaken Himself?

In John 20:17, Jesus said He would ascend to the Father after His resurrection. Did He ascend to Himself?

These and many other biblical passages demonstrate to a rational Bible reader that the Trinity teaching is not only unbiblical, but also utterly illogical!

Muhammad(saw) was The Spirit Of Truth in John 16:13!

Who is The Spirit Of Truth in John 16:13? Is It The Holy Prophet Of Islam? or the Christians third god – Holy Ghost?

Note : Click THIS to learn the appropriate response to ALL Christians polemics regarding this subject

While proving here that the Comforter in John’s Gospel is not the Holy Ghost we will also prove simultaneously that Jesus is not a member of the Trinity by exposing the mysterious Comforter.

Look at the following words of Jesus in the next verses. Instead of the word “father” let’s add God’s real name: YHWH to the verse to make it very personal to each of us:

But the hour cometh and now is, when the true worshipers shall worship the YHWH in spirit and in truth: for the Father/YHWH seeketh such to worship him. JOHN 4:23 KJV

Notice Jesus leaves no room for interpretation of His words. Jesus clearly lets us know that we are only to worship the Father YHWH only. However, that is not what we observed in Christianity. Christians worship Jesus which is definitely a sin! This is why Jesus gives us two categories of people:

I.    People who worship YHWH the heavenly Father.

II.   People who ignore the Father and instead worship Jesus.

Now maybe I am misinterpreting Jesus’ words; maybe Jesus does want us to worship Him. The next contextual verse should tell us what Jesus is trying to say right? Then let’s see what Jesus is trying to tell us:

  • YHWH is a SPIRIT: and they that worship YHWH must worship him in spirit and in truth. JOHN 4:24

Again Jesus takes Himself out of the worship equation! How did the theologians get this one so wrong?  According to Jesus, YHWH is the only entity to be known as God and we must worship YHWH in spirit and in truth. Now how hard is that people?

Stop listening to the Greco-Roman Catholic Churches and stop worshipping Jesus. Now that you can finally see this truth it is safe to proceed on to learn about the comforter…

Christians have been taught by the theologians of the past that when Jesus allegedly died, He sent back a supernatural entity to the Disciples which we call the Comforter. Christians are also told that this comforter is supposed to be the alleged”Third” entity of the alleged Holy Trinity; which is called the HOLY GHOST.

Once again we need to go back to the scriptures and see if what is written in the book of John is true. We also need to see if John’s gospels can be confirmed with the rest of the bible. Now if it cannot be substantiated with the rest of the bible, then you will have to accept that the false writers of the Catholic Church probably changed the true meaning of the words of Jesus or just added more lies to the bible to justify their false pagan doctrines.

The Representative of God on Earth is Prophet Of God!

I do believe that as we review the scriptures in the bible God will reveal to you that our interpretation of Jesus’ words is based on a falsehood doctrine with no biblical backing whatsoever.

There is no “SEPARATE” Holy Spirit.  If you are ready then let’s go directly to the bible for true enlightenment. To get a true understanding of Jesus’ words we have to start at John 14:1 thru 8. Jesus knows His ministry time is about to end and informs the Disciples that He will no longer be able to lead them. Now the next verses are crucial in gaining an understanding of what Jesus is trying to say:

  • I am the way the truth and the life; no man cometh unto the Father but by me. If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also; and fromhenceforth ye know him and have “seen” him. JOHN 14:6-7

These verses are misunderstood by Christians because of the lies of the Catholic Church. The words of Jesus above apply to all of God’s prophets and not just to Jesus. When a man is chosen by God he is speaking on behalf of God on earth and becomes God.That man becomes the “word”of God manifested in human form.

That particular prophet becomes the way to God, he tells the truth of God, and he teaches of the keys to eternal life! There is no way for any of us to reconnect to God unless we learn and follow the principles that are taught by Jesus and the other prophets of God as well. This was all Jesus was trying to say; nothing more. Let’s go to the next verse:

  • If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also; and from henceforth ye know him and have “seen” him. JOHN 14:7

Now is Jesus trying to say that He is literally God/YHWH?? Of course not and in the context of each additional verse we will see that the Disciples never believed Jesus was making that sort of claim either. Now in verse 8, Philip asks Jesus to reveal to them who the Father YHWH really is. A frustrated Jesus looks at Philip in verse 9 and says the following:

  • …he that has seen me hast seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father? JOHN 14:9

Jesus was a little agitated because Philip wasn’t really grasping Jesus’ true purpose for teaching them. Again Jesus is not claiming to be literally YHWH and I will prove that with the very next verse!

  • Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? The “WORD”that I speak unto you I speak NOT OF MYSELFbut YHWH the Father that dwelleth in me “HE/YHWH” doeth the works. JOHN 14:10

I think this verse clearly says it all! As you can see Jesus gives us the definition of what He was trying to say all along. He is not the Father!

In the verse above Jesus takes Himself out of the heavenly Trinitarian equation again. First Philip wanted to see the Father, and Jesus tells Philip that since He is sent as God’s representative then you are seeing the Father. Why? Because Jesus is speaking on behalf of the Father, duh! For those who still do not understand Jesus’ words Jesus then adds to the verse and says that He is not talking about Himself!

Now if the man tells us that He is not talking about Himself, then who do you think He is speaking about? He is speaking only about the Father. Lastly, Jesus says that just like Moses, Elijah, Isaiah and the other Prophets, He is nothing more than a vessel that God uses to do the“works.” That’s right people, Jesus was just a prophet sent with the words of God!

In verse 12, Jesus tells the Disciples that they too can have the “same” power to become the “way, the truth, and the life.”

  • Verily, verily, I say unto you. He that believeth on me; the “works” that I do shall“he (Disciples) do also; and greater “works” than these shall he (Disciples) do; because I go unto my Father. JOHN 14:12,14

Wow, Jesus is a great teacher isn’t He! Jesus does not have any special powers. Jesus tells the Disciples that they also will be able to walk on water, turn water into wine or even raise the dead and even greater miracles than these. All the Disciples have to do is one thing:

  • If ye love me. Keep my commandments. JOHN 14:15

Just keep the commandments and follow Jesus’ commandments and instruction. Again how hard is that? Now we can move on to understand Jesus words about the comforter:

Let’s read Jesus’ words:

  • And I will pray the FATHER and HE shall give you ANOTHER Comforter,that (HE) may abide with you for ever; Even the SPIRIT OF TRUTH whom the world cannot receive because it seeth Him not neither knoweth Him but ye know Him for He dwelleth with you and shall be in you. JOHN 14:16, 17

Now this is where the story gets interesting.We have all read verses 16 and 17 as one full statement. That is totally incorrect. The problem with that is you do not get the full understanding of what each verse is actually saying. Each verse is actually saying something different and distinct and we didn’t understand it.

As I break down each verse I’ll show you what I mean. Now in the verse below, Jesus is trying to console the Disciples:

  • And I will pray the FATHER and HE shall give you ANOTHER Comforter,that (HE) may abide with you forever. JOHN 14:16

Since Jesus is about to leave, Jesus tells the Disciples that He is going to pray and ask God to see if God will send them another teacher that will be allowed to stay with them always. Now let’s move to the next verse:

  • Even the SPIRIT OF TRUTH whom the world cannot receive because it seeth Him not neither knoweth Him but ye know Him for He dwelleth with you and shall be in you. JOHN 14:16, 17

Now is this comforter person going to “be” the spirit of truth or is he going to“teach” the word of truth? The answer is that He is going to teach the “word”of truth and he will replace Jesus as God’s voice on earth. This new prophet will teach the lost people the “truth”about God because the people are lost and refuse to receive Him. The world cannot see God because the world does not know who He is.

Jesus tells the Disciples they already have knowledge of YHWH because He lives inside them. YHWH/HOLY SPIRIT shall always be “in” them.Now you are starting to gain an understanding! Now before we go on, I want you to see another misunderstood concept of Jesus:

  • …and I will “manifest myself” to him.  JOHN 14:21

We all think that Jesus was saying that He has power to appear and reappear to us from heaven. This is not what Jesus meant by manifesting Himself to us. Even Judas wanted to know what Jesus meant by these words. So let’s have Jesus give us an explanation of His words:

  • …If a man loves me, he will keep my “words”; and my Father/YWHW will love him, and we will come unto him and make our abode with him.  JOHN 14:23

So as you can see, if we simply follow and obey the principles of Jesus about God then the love of God and the love of our teacher Jesus will always be in our hearts. People will look upon us and when they see us, they will see the Father!

When they look upon us they will see Jesus and Elijah, Moses and the rest of the ministers of God too! Now let’s move on to Jesus next mention of this comforter:

  • But the COMFORTER, which is the HOLY GHOST{SPIRIT}, whom the FATHER WILL SEND in my name HE SHALL TEACH you “ALL” things: and bring ALL THINGS to remembrance whatsoever I have said unto you.  JOHN 14:26

Jesus says the new prophet whom the Father will send to replace Him will be the Holy Spirit, YHWH on earth.

Jesus says that this prophet will teach the world all things and bring all things to remembrance!”

Jesus makes it clear that He and this Comforter are representatives or prophets of God.

Now for the shocking verse!

  • Hereafter I will not talk much with you; for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.  JOHN 14:30

Now Jesus tells us something that Christians can’t accept. Jesus clearly says:“Hereafter or, soon I will not be able to talk to you anymore.”

Now why is that Jesus? It was because the prince of the world, Satan was about to come and cause His death. Now you know straight from Jesus’ own mouth that He is not supernaturaland a part of the Trinity Godhead!

John 14:31 eliminates Jesus from being a supernatural god altogether and show us that He considered Himself to be only a prophet that was sent by God!

  • But that the world may know that I love the Father; and as the Father gave me a commandment, even so I do.  JOHN 14:31

The comforter that Jesus told us about was supposed to make us remember the TRUE message of Jesus concerning all the things GOD has told us to do in the faithful service of Him.

As you can see, mainstream Christians have no idea what Jesus was trying to say.

Christian’s concept of the Holy Ghost in their churches is a learned false act of vain showmanship for the masses. This is definitely not what Jesus was speaking of in any of the scriptures.

Lets move on…


The Comforter is definitely not the “Holy Ghost” because the coming of the Comforter wasconditional whereas that of the Holy Ghost was not as we observe in the prophecy :

Nevertheless, I tell you the truth: It is expedient for you that I go for If I Go Not Away, The Comforter Will Not Come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you. John 16:7

“lf I don’t go he won’t come, but if I go, I will send him.

There are numerous instances in the Holy Bible about the coming and going of the HOLY GHOST, before the birth and departure of the Messiah. Do yourself a favour, please verify these references in your Bible –


1. … and he (John the Baptist) shall be filled with the Holy Ghost,even from his mother’s womb.(HOLY BIBLE) Luke 1: 15

2. … and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost. (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 1: 41

3. And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Ghost.(HOLY BIBLE) Luke 1:67


4. … and the Holy Ghost was upon him (Simeon).(HOLY BIBLE) Luke 2:26

5. And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him (Jesus). (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 3:22

From the above quotations, before and after the birth of Jesus, one cannot help admiring St. Luke who appears to be a specialist on the Holy Ghost. We may well ask the Christians, after the descent of the “dove”, with whose help did Jesus perform his many miracles if not with the help of the Holy Ghost?

Let the Master himself tell us. When accused by his own people, the Jews, that he was working in league with Beelzebub (the chief of the devils) to work his miracles, Jesus (pbuh) rhetorically questions them, “How can Satan cast out Satan?” The Jews imputed that this spirit of holiness – the Spirit of God – which was helping him, was devilish. This was treason of the highest order. So he gives them a dire warning:

… but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, it shall never be forgiven (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 12:31

This “Holy Ghost” is non other than what Matthew himself has described in three verses before quoting the Master:

But if I (Jesus) cast out devils by the Spirit OF God, then the kingdom of God is come upon you. (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 12:28

Compare the same statement by another Gospel writer

But if I (Jesus) by the Finger Of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you. HOLY BIBLE) Luke 11:20

You do not have to be a Bible scholar to understand that the expressions (a) “Finger of God” (b) “Spirit of God” and (c) “Holy Ghost” are all synonymous phrases. So the Holy Ghostwas helping Jesus in his ministry. The Holy Ghost was also helping his disciples on their missions of preaching and healing. If there is still any doubt in your minds about the workings of the Holy Ghost then please read:


as my Father hath sent me, even so I send you (the disciples of Jesus),And when he had said this, be breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive Ye The Holy Ghost(HOLY BIBLE) John 20: 21 –22

This was surely no empty promise. The disciples must have received the gift of the Holy Ghost. So if the “Holy Ghost” was with (1) John the Baptist, (2) Elizabeth. (3) Zacharias. (4) Simeon. (5) Jesus and (6) the Disciples of Jesus; then all this makes nonsense of the saying that “if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you.

Therefore the Comforter is not the Holy Ghost!

Let’s continue.

  • And now I HAVE TOLD YOU BEFORE IT COME TO PASS, that when it is come to pass YE MIGHT BELIEVE. JOHN 14:29

Jesus prepares the Disciples for the arrival of the new Messiah or Anointed one. Jesus tells them the reason He is saying all of these things so that when he finally arrives they might believe. See what happens when you take your time and read each verse carefully, you gain true understanding.

Every Prophet, priest and teacher that God calls to proclaim and teach His Holy words is in fact a “COMFORTER!” 

Noah was a Comforter in Genesis 5:29

Isaiah was a Comforter in  Isaiah 51:12

Isaiah’s mother was a Comforter, Isaiah 66:13

II Samuel 10:3 speaks of the Comforter as a person

I Chronicles 19:3

Job 16:2

Psalms 69:20

Ecclesiates 4:1

Nahum 3:7

We know that anyone who was sent by God to give His words was also known as “GOD” all throughout the Bible:

  • And the LORD said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a GOD to Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. EXODUS 7:1

Now was Moses actually YHWH God? Of course not, when Moses went to Pharaoh he was a representative of YHWH just like Jesus and he became God in flesh!

  • And the LORD said unto JOSHUA, this day will I begin to MAGNIFY THEE in the sight of Israel that they may know that as I WAS WITH MOSES so I will be WITH THEE. JOSHUA 3:7

As you can see Joshua also became God in flesh just like Moses. Doesn’t this sound just like the words of Jesus?

  • …he that has seen me hast seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father? JOHN 14:9
  • And JOSHUA said unto the children of Israel, Come hither, and hear the “WORD” of the Lord your God. And JOSHUA said, Hereby ye shall know that the Living God is AMONG YOU JOSHUA 3:9, 10
  • Jesus answered them and said, “My doctrine is not Mine, but (His) Who (SENT ME). JOHN 7:16
  • He who does not love me does not keep my words; and the word which you hear is not mine but the Father’s who SENT me. JOHN 14:24
  • Now therefore GO, and I will be with thy MOUTH and teach thee what to WHAT TO SAY! EXODUS 4:12

Compare this scripture to the words of Jesus below:

  • For I have NOT spoken on my own authority; but the Father who (SENT ME) gave me a command, WHAT I SHOULD SAY and what I SHOULD SPEAK. JOHN 12:49

As you can see the words of all of the prophets are the same as Jesus’ words!

Jesus tells us that the words that He speaks belong only to the God that SENT Him.

He tells us that He is speaking on behalf of the Father who gave Him a command and taught Him what He should “SAY”and what He should

“SPEAK.”  Jesus the “Man” received His teaching ministry from God the same way Moses did:

  • And (thou) shalt speak unto him, and put words in his mouth and I will be with THY MOUTH, and with HIS MOUTH, and WILL TEACH YOU WHAT YE SHALL DO.   EXODUS 4:15
  • And he shall be thy spokesman unto the people: and he shall be, even he shall be to thee instead of a mouth, and (THOU) SHALT BE TO HIM (INSTEAD) OF GOD. EXODUS 4:15, 16

God makes it perfectly clear for us that anyone He sends to the people is standing and speaking in His name!   Now do you see the true status of Jesus?  Jesus and Moses were both COMFORTERS sent by God!

Moses like Jesus was made GOD because He represented God. Moses had his Disciple, Aaron and taught him about God just as Jesus also prepared His Disciples to teach and become“God on earth” as Jesus and Moses were.

We see from the above scriptures that all the Prophets that God sent were all “AS ONE” with GOD and as a representative of GOD. They became GOD because HE IS “ONE” WITH THEM AND THEY ARE “ONE” IN HIM. Now let’s move on to Jesus’ next usage of the word: comforter:

  • Nevertheless I tell you the TRUTH; it is EXPEDIENT for you that I go away;for if I go not away the COMFORTER will not come unto you: but if I depart, I will send him unto you. JOHN 16:7

Jesus tries to cheer up the Disciples and tells them that a good thing is about to happen when He leaves.  A new comforter or leader will come to them.

Now here is the million dollar question:

“Is this Comforter a “MAN” or an actual “Holy Ghost” as Christianity proclaims?”

My answer is that the new comforter is the long awaited Prophet Muhammad(saw). I can easily come to that conclusion by Jesus’ own description of the man:  Let’s see:

  • And when (HE) is come, (HE) will reprove the world of SIN and of RIGHTEOUSNESS and of JUDGMENT.  JOHN 16: 8

So as you can see the comforter is in fact a human man and not a supernatural Holy Ghost character! I want you to read this verse again and I want you to notice clearly the specific tasks this man will perform once He finally arrives on earth.

The comforter will reprove or scold the entire world and teach the world all things about sinfulness, true righteousness and of the soon coming judgment and dreaded



Now let’s look at the next three verses as Jesus breaks down the three things the new Comforter will address to the world in great detail:

  • Of SIN because they believe not on me. JOHN 16: 9

Jesus lets us know that the new Comforter will have a greater impact on the people than He has. I know that doesn’t seem possible especially since millions in the world worship Jesus to this very day.

However Jesus says this man will be sent by God to rebuke the world and teach them the truth about their sins. Now why does Jesus say this man will be sent to do this? Jesus says clearly:

Because they do not believe my words!”

Wow! How much clearer can that statement be? Yes people, this man will have an even greater impact on the world than Jesus did! Now what else does Jesus say this man will do? Let’s see:

  • Of RIGHTEOUSNESS, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more; JOHN 16: 10

Oh my! This verse is a good one! Jesus says this new Comforter will come to teach the world true righteousness.

Why does Jesus say this man has to come and teach this? Jesus says it is because He is about to die and, here is the good part:

“You will see me NO MORE!”

Yes you heard it clearly! Jesus tells the Disciples that once he ascended they will not see Him again!

So now do you see why the stories of Jesus coming back and speaking to the Disciples and toPaul were all Pagan additions to the bible? You have had to swallow a lot, so take a step back for a moment and catch your breath. Now let’s finish the last part of Jesus’ words:

  • Of JUDGMENT, because the prince of this world is judged.; JOHN 16: 11

Here again Jesus says that the new Comforter will warn the world about the soon to come judgment of God against the whole world. In other words, He is warning us of the “END TIMES” or that the Day of the Lord is coming.

Notice Jesus says that the end times period is when the prince of this world i.e. Satan will be judged also. Now if Satan is going to be judged at this time what do you think is going to happen to the rest of us? Huh? Wake up people!

These verses altogether eliminate all other false doctrines in Christianity. Jesus tells us something that Christians do not want to accept and that is, He is not the prophesied Comforter plain and simple! 

I could stop here at this verse but Jesus has a few more words for those of us that are just toobull-headed and stubborn and would rather die and go to hell rather than repent and change our ways.

So let’s have Jesus finish out His point in the next verse about this human man that we call the “Comforter:

  • I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. JOHN 16:12

JESUS mission is incomplete as evidence by his statement ..”I have yet many things to say unto you..”  Somehow, 
Jesus had quite a bit of knowledge about the new Messiah, A Prophet, ANOTHER COMFORTER. Jesus knew that the Disciples weren’t ready to grasp the concept of a futuristic Prophet. Even so, Jesus gives them one last piece of information concerning the ministry of the new human Comforter.

  • Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; JOHN 16:13

Now I stopped this very early so that we wouldn’t miss what is being said. Jesus says that when this man comes he will guide us all into truth. Now remember earlier Jesus eliminated Himself from the Trinitarian equation by telling us that He wasn’t speaking about Himself.

Now look at the last part where Jesus also eliminates the Comforter from a Trinitarian equation as well. Jesus says that this Comforter will not teach or say anything to the Jews on his own behalf. Remember that point as we finish out the remainder of the verse:

  • …for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall HEAR, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. JOHN 16:13

Wow! What have we just learned from Jesus’ words in this verse?

1.    This man is not a supernatural being.

2.    This man’s words are not about himself, they are about YHWH the Father of heaven only.

3.    Just like all prophets, this man will only tell us the direct words of God as he is given them by God.

4.    This man will tell us of the things that are about to come such as the “END TIMES!”

As you can see when you read this in context and put aside your pre-established bias thoughts, you can comprehend exactly the message that Jesus was trying to teach to His Disciples.

The Comforter that Jesus was talking about was the future Comforter. Jesus Comforter message is not new at all, it is the same message that John the Baptist was preaching in the wilderness when he was preaching about the kingdom of God is at hand.

  • In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea, And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. MATTHEW 3:1-2

John the Baptist died for teaching the word of God. God always has a Comforter in the bush. After John dies, Jesus is sent to continue the message of John:

  • From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. MATTHEW 4:17

As you can see Jesus was commissioned to continue the works of John the Baptist. Do you see the pattern? Now that it is Jesus’ time to die Jesus says that once again God has another Comforter in the bush!!!

This is why Jesus tells us another Comforter was coming to teach us the ALL TRUTH. That’s right, another prophet and Anointed one!  It’s not over people of God! we have much more to learn!

So who is this person you might ask?

Remember I mentioned earlier that Jesus’ prophecy wasn’t new at all. So to find the true answer to your question we have to go back to the original prophecy in the book of Malachi and see if God gives us the name of this futuristic Comforter:

  • Behold I will send you ELIJAH the PROPHET before the coming of the great and dreadful DAY OF THE LORD. MALACHI 4:5

Are you just as excited as I am? John the Baptist, Jesus and Malachi are all on  “one accord!”

So as you can see YHWH says in the book of Malachi that Christianity was totally wrong.

God was not sending Jesus to the rest of the world and Jesus confirmed this point all throughout the book of John. You cannot say that I am twisting anything in these verses because you have followed right along with me step by step as we have heard Jesus’ own words.

Jesus told us clearly that He was NOT a part of a Trinitarian Godhead. 

In the verse above YHWH tells us that His futuristic Comforter will be someone named “Elijah” and that Elijah the Comforter will be a human Prophet!

Let’s continue…

Remember in John 16:8-11 Jesus told us what the mission of the comforter was earlier. Now listen to Malachi confirm Jesus words about Elijah the Comforter, Messiah,Christ or Anointed One:

  • And (HE) shall TURN THE HEART of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and SMITE THE EARTH WITH A CURSE.  MALACHI 4:6

So Malachi confirms the words of Jesus. Malachi tells us the same exact story as written in the book of John where Jesus says the “Comforter” will reprove/rebuke the people for their sins before the Great Day of the Lord. 

Now what do you think Elijah will teach the world about the Father?

Well that is very easy and I will let God tell you what that message is from the book of Malachi:

  • And Remember ye the LAW OF MOSES my servant, which I commanded unto him in Horeb for all Israel, with the statutes and judgments. MALACHI 4:4

Now you know the total truth! We are not to listen to the lies of Mainstream Romanized Pagan Christianity at all. We are to turn and obey the Laws of the Old Testament Gospels only. Notice the following from the above verse:

  1. God says that you and I must follow and obey the Laws of Moses and all of the statutes and judgments that are written in the Old Testament books.

This contradicts the lies of Paul/Satan,and the Catholic sons of Satan. They lied and told us that we are under “Grace” and not the Laws of Moses because Jesus allegedly freed us from the law by dying for our sins.

  1. God says contrary to Paul’s lies that if we fail to obey these laws then He will smite the entire earth with a curse!

As you can see, calling on the name of Jesus will never help us out of this terrible situation! From all that we have learned we can see just what Jesus was trying to tell us before the Greco-Roman Church tampered with the bible. Jesus and Malachi’s message was without question totally identical.

Now there is another piece to this puzzle that I have to clear up for the most stubborn of Christianity to prove that the Comforter was not the Holy Ghost. So let’s go back to Jesus’ words and find out the meaning of the phrase: “SPIRIT OF TRUTH.”

  • … Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into ALL TRUTH. JOHN 16:13

Now because of the word “spirit” Christians have been led to believe that this is the magical Holy Ghost/Spirit character and the third entity of the Trinity. This spirit of truth is not the comforter’s name. The spirit of truth is the “TRUTH” of God that he brings to the people about God.

The way Jesus phrases His statement is not new at all. Others in the bible have used this same word phrasing when speaking about other humans chosen by God to teach the good news of the gospel such as Levi:

  • And ye shall know that I have sent this commandment unto you, that my covenant might be with Levi, saith the LORD of hosts. My covenant was with him of life and peace; and I gave them to him for the fear wherewith he feared me, and was afraid before my name. MALACHI 2:4-5
  • The LAW OF TRUTH was in his mouth, and iniquity was not found in his lips: he walked with me n peace and equity, and did turn many away from iniquity. MALACHI 2:4-6

Did you see what God said as concerning Levi? Notice clearly God says that He used Levi just like He used Jesus and the other prophets to give us His commandments.

Secondly, Jesus said earlier that He was the way, the truth and the life. As you can see from this verse Levi also can make the same claim. The bible says that all the people that obeyed Levi’s commandments turned away from their iniquity/(SIN) just like those of us that will obey Jesus’ commandments will also turn away from our sins.

God says that He made a special covenant with Levi concerning eternal life and peace the same as the one He made with Jesus. This is where God used the phrasing the “LAW OF TRUTH” in pertaining to Levi.  The Law of Truth was the “WORD” of God manifested in flesh in the mouth of Levi. 

Just like Jesus, when Levi spoke the words of God to the people, he became God unto the people to all that would obey his words and commandments.

My Brothers and Sisters, WILL YOU ARGUE WITH GOD? Still not convinced yet?

Then let’s continue:

  • … Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: JOHN 16:13

Notice that Jesus called the futuristic Comforter/Messiah/Prophet the:


In Malachi 2:6, God called Levi the prophet the:


Now some of you will say these two verses are saying something totally different. How you can come up with that theory I do not have a clue. So to prove to you that the “spirit of truth” that Jesus was talking about is a literal human prophet sent to administer God’s word, let’s stay in the book of John.

Since the writer of the book of John was a Disciple, let’s see if he can explain Jesus’ use of the phrase “spirit of truth.”

Does John tell us that the “SPIRIT OF TRUTH,” is a man? Let’s see.

John says:

  • “WE” (Disciples) are of God: he that knoweth God HEARETH US; he that is not of God HEARETH NOT US.

Hereby know (WE) the SPIRIT OF TRUTH and the “SPIRIT OF ERROR.” 1st JOHN 4:6

Can you argue with the truth now? John uses the term “spirit of truth” to describe himself and the other humans that represent God! So how can you argue with the writer who clearly explains Jesus’ definition of the term: “spirit of truth?”

As you can see anyone who is sent from God is a representative of God! This MAN or Woman when they have received the word directly from God, this person is then known as the Spirit of Truth.


It may be noted that no Biblical scholar of any standing has ever equated the “paracletos” of John in the original Greek with the Holy Ghost. Now we can say with one breath that if the Comforter is the “Holy Spirit” then that Holy Spirit is the Holy Prophet!

As Muslims we acknowledge that every true prophet of God is Holy and without sin. But whenever the expression “The Holy Prophet” is used among Muslims it is universally accepted as referring to the Holy Prophet Muhummed (pbuh). So even if we accept the above incongruous saying — “the Comforter which is the Holy Spirit,” as Gospel truth, even then this prophecy will fit Muhummed (pbuh) like a glove, without any stretching of its meaning.

The same John, who is supposed to have authored the Gospel bearing his name, also penned three more Epistles which are also part of the Christian Bible. Amazingly he has used the same terminology of “Holy Spirit” for “Holy Prophet.

Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. 1 John 4:1

You can observe that the word spirit is used here synonymously with a prophet. A true spirit is a true prophet, and a false spirit is a false prophet But for the so-called “born-again” Christians who see only with eyes of emotion, I recommend that they lay their hands on C.I. Scofield’s Authorized King lames Version of the Bible who with an Editorial Committee of 9 D.D.’s adding their notes and comments. When they come to the First word “spirit” in the above verse they should give a notation to compare it with Matthew 7: 15 which confirms that false prophets are false spirits. So according to St. John the Holy Spirit is the Holy Prophet, and the Holy Prophet is Muhummed (pbuh) the Messenger of God.

But St. John does not leave us in the air, guessing the true from the false. He gives us an acid test for recognising the true Prophet, he says –

Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ iscome in the flesh is of God: 1 John 4:2

According to John’s own interpretation in verse one above the word “spirit” is synonymous with the word prophet. So verse two “Spirit of God” would mean “Prophet of God” and“Every spirit” would stand for “every Prophet”. You have a right to know as to what the Holy Prophet Muhummed (pbuh) says about “Jesus Christ.”



We now come to the four most comprehensive and decisive verses in John. chapter sixteen to solve the enigma of the Successor to Christ. For Jesus (pbuh) did truly say:

I have yet Many Things to say unto you, but Ye Cannot Bear Them Now. (HOLY BIBLE) John 16: 12

We will later tie up the phrase “many things” from the above verse with “guide you into all truth” from the verse that follows, when discussing it. For now. let us discuss the phrase —“YE CANNOT BEAR THEM NOW”

The truth of this statement “ye cannot bear them now” is repeated monotonously throughout the pages of the New Testament:

And he (Jesus) saith unto them (the disciples). Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith.Mat 8:26

AND (JESUS) said unto him (Peter) O Thou of little faith. Mat 14:31


he (Jesus) said unto them (the disciples), O Ye of little faith, why reason among yourselves Mat 16:8


And he (Jesus) said unto them (his disciples). Where is your faith? Luke 8:25

We must bear in mind that this is not the indictment of Jesus (pbuh) on the indecisiveness of the Jews, but on his very own elect. He stoops down to the level of little children to make things plain to his disciples but he is compelled to burst out in frustration

And Jesus said, Are Ye Even Yet Without Understanding? Mat 15:16

And when he was provoked to breaking point, he rails against his chosen ones —“…

…Oh faithless and perverse generation how long shall I be with you, how long shall I bear with you? Luke 9:41



I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. John 16:12

Howbeit when he, the Spirit Of Truth, is come, he will guide you into ALL truth, John 16:13

It has already been established that. Biblically, the word “Spirit” is used synonymously for“Prophet,” by the same author in 1 John 4: 1 (as seen earlier).

Hence the “Spirit of Truth” would be the “Prophet of Truth”. A prophet in whom Truth is personified. He had walked through life so honourably and industriously that he had won for himself even from his pagan fellow countrymen the noble designation of as-Saadiq (the Truthful One) and al-Amin, “the Honest,” “the Upright.” “the Trustworthy;” the Man of Faith who never broke his word. His life, his personality, his teachings are the veritable proof of Muhummed (pbuh) being the embodiment of Truth (al-Amin) — the Spirit Of Truth

we will now combine, “I have yet MANY things to say unto you” from verse twelve, with“he will guide you into ALL truth.” From John 16: 12 and 13.
If the Christian still persists that the Spirit of Truth of this prophecy is the Holy Ghost then ask him or her whether in their language does “MANY” means more than one? Also if “ALL” in the above verse means more than one? If you get a halting, wavering, hesitant “y-e-s” then close the book. it is not worth pursuing dialogues with opinionated fools. But if you get the answer “yes!” with alacrity then proceed …

The one prophesied by Jesus (pbuh) was to unravel many things which he had left unsaid, as well as to guide humanity into all truth. There are many problems facing mankind today, for which we are fumbling for answers. Can you please give me one new thing that the alleged Holy Ghost gave to anybody in the past two thousand years, which Jesus Christ had not already given in so many different words? I don’t want many, I’ am looking for just one!NO SOLUTION FROM THE HOLY GHOST!!!Yet the promise was that the coming Comforter -“he will guide you into all truth!” If the Spirit of Truth of this prophecy is the Holy Ghost then every Church and denomination, and every ‘born-again’ Christian is claiming the gift of the Holy Ghost. The Roman Catholics claim that they have the whole Truth because of the so-called “in-dwelling” of the Holy Ghost. The Anglicans make the same claim, and the Methodists, the Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Seventh Day Adventists, the Baptists, the Christadelphians. etc. etc. not forgetting the ‘born-agains’ who claim to be numbering over 70 million in the United States alone.

You have the right to demand solutions from them, on the authority of the Holy Ghost, for the problems listed below:

1. Alcohol
3. Fortune Telling
4. Idol Worship, Devil Worship
5. Racism
6. Problem of Surplus Women etc etc.
Zakir Hussain DEBUNKS Christian arguments for ‘The Comforter’ being the ‘Holy Spirit’!

Evidences that Matthew 28:19 Is Fraud

A Collection of Evidence Against the  Traditional Wording of Matthew 28:19

By: Clinton D. Willis CWillis@ipa.net

Sources : http://www.onenesspentecostal.com/matt2819-willis.htm

Same expose in :





Constantine Wrote Matthew 28:19 Into Your Bible!




The Gospel of Matthew, the Fraud!




The Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics:

As to Matthew 28:19, it says: It is the central piece of evidence for the traditional (Trinitarian) view.  If it were undisputed, this would, of course, be decisive, but its trustworthiness is impugned on grounds of textual criticism, literary criticism and historical criticism. The same Encyclopedia further states that: “The obvious explanation of the silence of the New Testament on the triune name, and the use of another (JESUS NAME) formula in Acts and Paul, is that this other formula was the earlier, and the triune formula is a later addition.”

Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28:

“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.”

The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:

“It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”

Wilhelm Bousset, Kyrios Christianity, page 295:

“The testimony for the wide distribution of the simple baptismal formula [in the Name of Jesus] down into the second century is so overwhelming that even in Matthew 28:19, the Trinitarian formula was later inserted.”

The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:

“The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”

Hastings Dictionary of the Bible 1963, page 1015:

“The Trinity.-…is not demonstrable by logic or by Scriptural proofs,…The term Trias was first used by Theophilus of Antioch (c AD 180),…(The term Trinity) not found in Scripture…” “The chief Trinitarian text in the NT is the baptismal formula in Mt 28:19…This late post-resurrection saying, not found in any other Gospel or anywhere else in the NT, has been viewed by some scholars as an interpolation into Matthew. It has also been pointed out that the idea of making disciples is continued in teaching them, so that the intervening reference to baptism with its Trinitarian formula was perhaps a later insertion into the saying. Finally, Eusebius’s form of the (ancient) text (“in my name” rather than in the name of the Trinity) has had certain advocates. (Although the Trinitarian formula is now found in the modern-day book of Matthew), this does not guarantee its source in the historical teaching of Jesus. It is doubtless better to view the (Trinitarian) formula as derived from early (Catholic) Christian, perhaps Syrian or Palestinian, baptismal usage (cf Didache 7:1-4), and as a brief summary of the (Catholic) Church’s teaching about God, Christ, and the Spirit:…”

The Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge:

“Jesus, however, cannot have given His disciples this Trinitarian order of baptism after His resurrection; for the New Testament knows only one baptism in the name of Jesus (Acts 2:38; 8:16; 10:43; 19:5; Gal. 3:27; Rom. 6:3; 1 Cor. 1:13-15), which still occurs even in the second and third centuries, while the Trinitarian formula occurs only in Matt. 28:19, and then only again (in the) Didache 7:1 and Justin, Apol. 1:61…Finally, the distinctly liturgical character of the formula…is strange; it was not the way of Jesus to make such formulas…the formal authenticity of Matt. 28:19 must be disputed…” page 435.

The Jerusalem Bible, a scholarly Catholic work, states:

“It may be that this formula, (Triune Matthew 28:19) so far as the fullness of its expression is concerned, is a reflection of the (Man-made) liturgical usage established later in the primitive (Catholic) community. It will be remembered that Acts speaks of baptizing “in the name of Jesus,”…”

The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, page 2637, Under “Baptism,” says:

Matthew 28:19 in particular only canonizes a later ecclesiastical situation, that its universalism is contrary to the facts of early Christian history, and its Trinitarian formula (is) foreign to the mouth of Jesus.”

New Revised Standard Version says this about Matthew 28:19:

“Modern critics claim this formula is falsely ascribed to Jesus and that it represents later (Catholic) church tradition, for nowhere in the book of Acts (or any other book of the Bible) is baptism performed with the name of the Trinity…”

James Moffett’s New Testament Translation:

In a footnote on page 64 about Matthew 28:19 he makes this statement: “It may be that this (Trinitarian) formula, so far as the fullness of its expression is concerned, is a reflection of the (Catholic) liturgical usage established later in the primitive (Catholic) community, It will be remembered that Acts speaks of baptizing “in the name of Jesus, cf. Acts 1:5 +.”

Tom Harpur:

Tom Harpur, former Religion Editor of the Toronto Star in his “For Christ’s sake,” page 103 informs us of these facts: “All but the most conservative scholars agree that at least the latter part of this command [Triune part of Matthew 28:19] was inserted later. The [Trinitarian] formula occurs nowhere else in the New Testament, and we know from the only evidence available [the rest of the New Testament] that the earliest Church did not baptize people using these words (“in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”) baptism was “into” or “in” the name of Jesus alone. Thus it is argued that the verse originally read “baptizing them in My Name” and then was expanded [changed] to work in the [later Catholic Trinitarian] dogma. In fact, the first view put forward by German critical scholars as well as the Unitarians in the nineteenth century, was stated as the accepted position of mainline scholarship as long ago as 1919, when Peake’s commentary was first published: “The Church of the first days (AD 33) did not observe this world-wide (Trinitarian) commandment, even if they knew it. The command to baptize into the threefold [Trinity] name is a late doctrinal expansion.”

The Bible Commentary 1919 page 723:

Dr. Peake makes it clear that: “The command to baptize into the threefold name is a late doctrinal expansion. Instead of the words baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost we should probably read simply-“into My Name.”

Theology of the New Testament:

By R. Bultmann, 1951, page 133 under Kerygma of the Hellenistic Church and the Sacraments. The historical fact that the verse Matthew 28:19 was altered is openly confesses to very plainly. “As to the rite of baptism, it was normally consummated as a bath in which the one receiving baptism completely submerged, and if possible in flowing water as the allusions of Acts 8:36, Heb. 10:22, Barn. 11:11 permit us to gather, and as Did. 7:1-3 specifically says. According to the last passage, [the apocryphal Catholic Didache] suffices in case of the need if water is three times poured [false Catholic sprinkling doctrine] on the head. The one baptizing names over the one being baptized the name of the Lord Jesus Christ,” later expanded [changed] to the name of the Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit.”

Doctrine and Practice in the Early Church:

By Dr. Stuart G. Hall 1992, pages 20 and 21. Professor Stuart G. Hall was the former Chair of Ecclesiastical History at King’s College, London England. Dr. Hall makes the factual statement that Catholic Trinitarian Baptism was not the original form of Christian Baptism, rather the original was Jesus name baptism. “In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,” although those words were not used, as they later are, as a formula. Not all baptisms fitted this rule.” Dr Hall further, states: “More common and perhaps more ancient was the simple, “In the name of the Lord Jesus or, Jesus Christ.” This practice was known among Marcionites and Orthodox; it is certainly the subject of controversy in Rome and Africa about 254, as the anonymous tract De rebaptismate (“On rebaptism”) shows.”

The Beginnings of Christianity: The Acts of the Apostles Volume 1, Prolegomena 1:

The Jewish Gentile, and Christian Backgrounds by F. J. Foakes Jackson and Kirsopp Lake 1979 version pages 335-337. “There is little doubt as to the sacramental nature of baptism by the middle of the first century in the circles represented by the Pauline Epistles, and it is indisputable in the second century. The problem is whether it can in this (Trinitarian) form be traced back to Jesus, and if not what light is thrown upon its history by the analysis of the synoptic Gospels and Acts.

According to Catholic teaching, (traditional Trinitarian) baptism was instituted by Jesus. It is easy to see how necessary this was for the belief in sacramental regeneration. Mysteries, or sacraments, were always the institution of the Lord of the cult; by them, and by them only, were its supernatural benefits obtained by the faithful. Nevertheless, if evidence counts for anything, few points in the problem of the Gospels are so clear as the improbability of this teaching.

The reason for this assertion is the absence of any mention of Christian baptism in Mark, Q, or the third Gospel, and the suspicious nature of the account of its institution in Matthew 28:19: “Go ye into all the world, and make disciples of all Gentiles (nations), baptizing them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.” It is not even certain whether this verse ought to be regarded as part of the genuine text of Matthew. No other text, indeed, is found in any extant manuscripts, in any language, but it is arguable that Justin Martyr, though he used the trine formula, did not find it in his text of the Gospels; Hermas seems to be unacquainted with it; the evidence of the Didache is ambiguous, and Eusebius habitually, though not invariably, quotes it in another form, “Go ye into all the world and make diciples of all the Gentiles in My Name.”

No one acquainted with the facts of textual history and patristic evidence can doubt the tendency would have been to replace the Eusebian text (In My Name) by the ecclesiastical (Catholic Trinitarian) formula of baptism, so that transcriptional evedence” is certainly on the side of the text omitting baptism.

But it is unnecessary to discuss this point at length, because even if the ordinary (modern Trinity) text of Matthew 28:19 be sound it can not represent historical fact.

Would they have baptized, as Acts says that they did, and Paul seem to confirm the statement, in the name of the Lord Jesus if the Lord himself had commanded them to use the (Catholic Trinitarian) formula of the Church? On every point the evidence of Acts is convincing proof that the (Catholic) tradition embodied in Matthew 28:19 is a late (non-Scriptural Creed) and unhistorical.

Neither in the third gospel nor in Acts is there any reference to the (Catholic Trinitarian) Matthaean tradition, nor any mention of the institution of (Catholic Trinitarian) Christian baptism. Nevertheless, a little later in the narrative we find several references to baptism in water in the name of the Lord Jesus as part of recognized (Early) Christian practice. Thus we are faced by the problem of a Christian rite, not directly ascribed to Jesus, but assumed to be a universal (and original) practice. That it was so is confirmed by the Epistles, but the facts of importance are all contained in Acts.”

Also in the same book on page 336 in the footnote number one, Professor Lake makes an astonishing discovery in the so-called Teaching or Didache. The Didache has an astonishing contradiction that is found in it. One passage refers to the necessity of baptism in the name of the Lord, which is Jesus the other famous passage teaches a Trinitarian Baptism. Lake raises the probability that the apocryphal Didache or the early Catholic Church Manual may have also been edited or changed to promote the later Trinitarian doctrine. It is a historical fact that the Catholic Church at one time baptized its converts in the name of Jesus but later changed to Trinity baptism.

“1. In the actual description of baptism in the Didache the trine (Trinity) formula is used; in the instructions for the Eucharist (communion) the condition for admission is baptism in the name of the Lord. It is obvious that in the case of an eleventh-century manuscript *the trine formula was almost certain to be inserted in the description of baptism, while the less usual formula had a chance of escaping notice when it was only used incidentally.”

The Catholic University of America in Washington, D. C. 1923, New Testament Studies Number 5:

The Lord’s Command To Baptize An Historical Critical Investigation. By Bernard Henry Cuneo page 27. “The passages in Acts and the Letters of St. Paul. These passages seem to point to the earliest form as baptism in the name of the Lord.” Also we find. “Is it possible to reconcile these facts with the belief that Christ commanded his disciples to baptize in the trine form? Had Christ given such a command, it is urged, the Apostolic Church would have followed him, and we should have some trace of this obedience in the New Testament. No such trace can be found. The only explanation of this silence, according to the anti-traditional view, is this the short christological (Jesus Name) formula was (the) original, and the longer trine formula was a later development.”

A History of The Christian Church:

1953 by Williston Walker former Professor of Ecclesiastical History at Yale University. On page 95 we see the historical facts again declared. “With the early disciples generally baptism was “in the name of Jesus Christ.” There is no mention of baptism in the name of the Trinity in the New Testament, except in the command attributed to Christ in Matthew 28:19. That text is early, (but not the original) however. It underlies the Apostles’ Creed, and the practice recorded (*or interpolated) in the Teaching, (or the Didache) and by Justin. The Christian leaders of the third century retained the recognition of the earlier form, and, in Rome at least, baptism in the name of Christ was deemed valid, if irregular, certainly from the time of Bishop Stephen (254-257).”

On page 61 Professor and Church historian Walker, reviles the true origin and purpose of Matthew 28:19. This Text is the first man-made Roman Catholic Creed that was the prototype for the later Apocryphal Apostles’ Creed. Matthew 28:19 was invented along with the Apocryphal Apostles’ Creed to counter so-called heretics and Gnostics that baptized in the name of Jesus Christ! Marcion although somewhat mixed up in some of his doctrine still baptized his converts the Biblical way in the name of Jesus Christ. Matthew 28:19 is the first non-Biblical Roman Catholic Creed! The spurious Catholic text of Matthew 28:19 was invented to support the newer triune, Trinity doctrine. Therefore, Matthew 28:19 is not the “Great Commission of Jesus Christ.” Matthew 28:19 is the great Catholic hoax! Acts 2:38, Luke 24:47, and 1 Corinthians 6:11 give us the ancient original words and teaching of Yeshua/Jesus! Is it not also strange that Matthew 28:19 is missing from the old manuscripts of Sinaiticus, Curetonianus and Bobiensis?

“While the power of the episcopate and the significance of churches of apostolical (Catholic) foundation was thus greatly enhanced, the Gnostic crisis saw a corresponding development of (man-made non-inspired spurious) creed, at least in the West. Some form of instruction before baptism was common by the middle of the second century. At Rome this developed, apparently, between 150 and 175, and probably in opposition to Marcionite Gnosticism, into an explication of the baptismal formula of Matthew 28:19 the earliest known form of the so-called Apostles Creed.”

Catholic Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger:

He makes this confession as to the origin of the chief Trinity text of Matthew 28:19. “The basic form of our (Matthew 28:19 Trinitarian) profession of faith took shape during the course of the second and third centuries in connection with the ceremony of baptism. So far as its place of origin is concerned, the text (Matthew 28:19) came from the city of Rome.” The Trinity baptism and text of Matthew 28:19 therefore did not originate from the original Church that started in Jerusalem around AD 33. It was rather as the evidence proves a later invention of Roman Catholicism completely fabricated. Very few know about these historical facts.

“The Demonstratio Evangelica” by Eusebius:

Eusebius was the Church historian and Bishop of Caesarea. On page 152 Eusebius quotes the early book of Matthew that he had in his library in Caesarea. According to this eyewitness of an unaltered Book of Matthew that could have been the original book or the first copy of the original of Matthew. Eusebius informs us of Jesus’ actual words to his disciples in the original text of Matthew 28:19: “With one word and voice He said to His disciples: “Go, and make disciples of all nations in My Name, teaching them to observe all things whatsover I have commanded you.” That “Name” is Jesus.


Matthew 28:19


Absolute proof Matthew 28:19 has been corrupted by trinitarians
Trinitarians have sinned against Jesus Christ For putting words in the Bible HE NEVER SAID

By Dr. G. Reckart, Apostolic Theological Bible College


Source : http://jesus-messiah.com/apologetics/catholic/matthew-proof.html

For over 20 years I have predicted the time would come when evidence would prove that the words “of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghostwere added to Matthew’s original Gospel.  It did not make sense to me for baptism to be in the name of the one who died and was resurrected in Romans 6 and the Father and Holy Ghost had to be mentioned in baptism.  I could not reconcile why the Apostles ignored Matthew 28:19 as it now exist in our KJV Bible and instead baptized in the name of Jesus Christ only.  Yes, in baptism they were “JESUS ONLY.” No one can find any other baptism in the New Testament.  No one can deny there is then ONE BAPTISM when reference is made to the New Testament mikvah.  Now we have the evidence and the trinity world is in for a massive shaking.

It was known by the Catholic Church that the Jews had preserved a copy of the original Gospel of Matthew in the Hebrew language.  How this was preserved and handed down we do not know.  In fact, it does not matter.  It exists and that is proof enough that God wanted it preserved.  There have been many attempts to destroy the credibility of this very valuable Hebrew Gospel for obvious reasons.  It is the only existing manuscript that proves Matthew 28:19 did not originally contain the trinitarian baptismal formula. Catholics and Protestants have no other reason to cast doubt on the validity of this manuscript.  Claims that it is spurious are of course self-serving to trinitarians.  Such denials make Jesus say what he did not say.  This of itself is an abomination.  It is a sin to make Jesus say a trinitarian baptismal formula and put into  his mouth their trinitarian godhead doctrine fabricated at Nicaea in 325AD.  Now that this manuscript is known among the Apostolic Oneness, we will promote the fact that the Catholic Church has willingly lied about Matthew 28:19 and the Catholics in general (including the Eastern Orthodox) have lied to the world.  Everyone who was baptized with this false baptism has died lost and without salvation, deceived by the Catholic Church.  This damnation of millions is the greatest doctrinal deception ever placed upon the human mind.  If those in trinitarianism do not flee from this perversion and be rebaptized in the name of Jesus Christ, they accept their damnation of having no salvation in that false baptism.  It is because of this finding that many Evangelicals now claim baptism is not essential to salvation and a person can be saved without it.  This Baptist false doctrine was developed when their scholars discovered the trinity baptismal formula was not in the original Hebrew Gospel of Matthew. Interesting that a false doctrine could be birthed based upon what is not in the Bible, rather then what is in the Bible.  Trinitarians hid the knowledge of this Hebrew Gospel from the Oneness Apostolics.  But God made it possible that through a Baptist scholar, the truth about the missing trinitarian baptismal formula would be published.

In 1995 Dr. George Howard translated a copy of Shem Tov’s Matthew Hebrew Gospel.  You may purchase a copy of “Hebrew Gospel of Matthew” from many sources.  You can look at the evidence for yourself.  For the first time in modern history the text of Matthew 28:19 from this Hebrew Gospel text is being posted on the internet.  I am the first to post this text.  I am sure others will steal my image files and go make their own page.  That’s ok, but at least have the fairness to tell me you are taking it.  At least tell me you are going to make a page.  At least give me credit for being the first to post it.

Please note that in verse 19 there is no trinitarian formula.
This is ABSOLUTE proof the trinity was fraudulently added to this text

Now that you have seen the evidence, you who have been baptized in the false trinitarian formula must see Acts 2:38 as the true and only baptismal formula in the New Testament, and to which all other incidents of this grace of God in subsequent text points.  If you desire to follow the correct New Testament Baptismal method, email me and we will try to arrange for your baptism.  You now have the information.  If you choose to believe a lie and accept a false baptism, then you will damn you own soul.  I urge you to consider your rebaptism today.  You can email me at acts0412@jmfi.org for a personal consultation about this matter.

Can we “ WORSHIP ” Jesus Christ?


Can we “ WORSHIP ” Jesus Christ?

My answer to the question can we worship Jesus Christ is Yes and No. No. We can not worship Jesus as the way we worship YHWH.   And; Yes. We can worship him the way other prophet “worshipped” other person.   What is worship? The answer to this question is important, not only because Christians should know what worship really is, but in discovering what worship is as well. We also find out who can be worshipped. Since the Bible was originally written in Hebrew and Greek, it is therefore necessary to begin our study of worship by looking at the Greek and Hebrew words that are translated as  “worship.” Unfortunately, because of the way the Greek and Hebrew words for “worship” have been translated into English, it can be difficult to learn correctly about worship from an English version oft he Bible. The Hebrew word shachah and the Greek word proskuneo account  for more than 80% of the appearances of the word “worship” in most English versions of the Bible, so these are the two words with which we want to concern ourselves. There are a few other words that are occasionally translated “worship” but have a more specific meaning outside of the idea of worship, and really should be translated differently. An example would be the Greekword latreuo, which means “to serve,” but in a few cases is translated “to worship.” A study of the Hebrew word shachah and the Greek word proskuneo reveals that both these words mean “to bow down.” The Hebrew word shachah (Strong’s number 7812) is used of bowing or prostrating oneself, often before a superior or before God. [1] In the King James Version, it is translated by a number of different English words, including: “worship” (99 times), “bow” (31 times), “bow down” (18 times), “obeisance” (9 times), and“reverence” (5 times). The Greek word proskuneo (Strong’s number 4505) comes from the Greek words pros, “to” or “toward,” and kuneo,“to kiss.” It literally means to kiss the hand to (toward) someone in token of reverence, and among the Orientals, to fall upon the knees and touch the ground with the forehead as an expression of profound reverence. Hence, in the New Testament it means kneeling or prostration to do homage or make obeisance,whether in order to express respect or to make supplication. [2] The examples of “worship” in the Bible confirms that in the biblical culture,people bowed down before those to whom they wanted to show respect or honor.

Lot “worshipped” (shachah) the strangers who came to Sodom even though he had never seen them before. He prostrated himself before them to show them respect (Gen. 19:1). Moses “worshipped” (shachah) his father in law, whom he respected and honored (Ex. 18:7). Abigail “worshipped” (shachah)David. She honored him by prostrating herself before him. ( 1 Samuel 25:40-41 )

These three examples can be multiplied many times over, but they show that when someone wanted to honor another, he would fall down before him. The act of falling down is called“worship,” and reveals the heart of the worshipper—respect and honor towards the one being worshipped. Many cultures besides the biblical culture have the custom of bowing to show respect or honor. The Japanese and Chinese bow to those they respect. In the courts of Europe it was customary to bow (or for women, to curtsy) to those of higher rank. In fact, even in the colonial culture of the United States it was common for men to bow in respect of one another and for the women to curtsy to show honor or respect, and occasionally we still see bowing and curtsying today. In some churches the custom of bowing before God has been modified into kneeling or genuflecting. For example, in the Roman Catholic Church people often genuflect, a shallow bow of the knee, to show their respect to God. In most protestant churches, although people no longer perform a full bow before the Lord, people “bow” their heads in prayer as a sign of respect. It is important to realize that in both biblical and modern “worship” (bowing down), the outward act of bowing reveals the inner heart of respect and honor. Why do we use the English word “worship” at all? Our word “worship” comes from the Old English “weorthscipe,” which means worthiness. We “worship” someone because they are “worth” the respect they receive. In British English, “Worship” was actually used as a title for various officials, usually magistrates and some mayors. Thus even in the derivation of the English word “worship” we see that it was not exclusively used of God or Jesus, but was used to designate someone worth the respect they received. When the words shachah appears in the Hebrew text, or proskuneo in the Greek text, they usually refer to the action of bowing down, and we can translate them that way into English, as the following examples show. Genesis 23:7

Then Abraham rose and bowed down [shachah]before the people of the land, the Hittites.

Genesis 33:3

He himself [Jacob] went on ahead and bowed down [shachah] to the ground seven times as he approached his brother[Esau].

Genesis 42:6

Now Joseph was the governor of the land, the one who sold grain to all its people. So when Joseph’s brothers arrived, they bowed down [shachah] to him with their faces to the ground.

Matthew 18:26

“The servant fell on his knees [proskuneo] before him. ‘Be patient with me,’ he begged, ‘and I will pay back everything.’

It is clear from the verses above that people “bowed down to,” or “worshipped” other people. A study of the Greek and Hebrew words and how they are translated shows something else—something that has misled many Christians. In many Bible versions, when the words shachah or proskuneo are used of one person to another, the translators use the English words “bow down” or something similar.However, when shachah or proskuneo refers to a person “bowing down” before God or Jesus, the translators almost always use the English word“worship.” The three examples below are typical. Exodus 24:1 Then he said to Moses, “Come up to the LORD, you and Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel. You are to worship [shachah]at a distance, Exodus 33:10 (NASB) When all the people saw the pillar of cloud standing at the entrance of the tent, all the people would arise and worship [shachah],each at the entrance of his tent. John 4:24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship [proskuneo] in spirit and in truth.” The verses above reveal a pattern that has caused many Christians to misunderstand“worship.” When the Hebrew or Greek words for worship refer tomen“worshipping” men, the translators use the English words “bow down.” However,when the act of worship is toward God or Jesus, then the translators use the English word “worship” in their Bibles. This way of translating understandably leads the English reader to believe that only God and Jesus are “worshipped.”How can a person reading the English Bible be expected to know that biblical“worship” is not just for God and Jesus when in his Bible the word “worship” is only used in reference to them? He cannot. Thus, although it is sad, it is understandable that people reading the English Bible conclude that Jesus must be God because Jesus is “worshipped.” As Bible students, we must get the facts straight. “Worshipping,” i.e., bowing down to someone, shows honor and respect. It can be toward anyone the person wants to honor, even, as we saw earlier in the case of Lot, a total stranger.People “worshipping” Jesus does not make him God any more than Abraham “bowing down” before the Hittites makes them God. The Greek and Hebrew need to be translated consistently. When they are, we can see that people “worshipped”other people and God (or they “bowed down to” other people and God). In practical application, superiors, kings, God, and Jesus get most of the honor or worship. There are times when it is not appropriate to honor or “worship” someone. God says that it is wrong to bow down before (shachah;worship) other gods (Ex. 23:24). That makes perfect sense. How could a person with any sincerity honor both God and demons? A different case involved Peter,who recognized that it was not appropriate for Cornelius to bow down to (proskuneo; worship) him, even though Cornelius respected Peter. Peter felt he was not superior to Cornelius, and accepting the worship would have sent the wrong message to Cornelius, so he stopped him (Acts10:25 and 26). Similarly, the angel stopped John from “worshipping” him. John felt the angel was superior and started to “worship” him. The angel had to correct him and remind him that the angel was only a “fellow servant” (Rev.22:8 and 9). In the following verse we find an account of the prophet Nathan coming in to see King David. 1 Kings 1:23

And they told the king, “Nathan the prophet is here.” So he went before the king and bowed [shachah] with his face to the ground.

Nathan was a prophet of God and yet he had no problem with “worshipping” King David,i.e., bowing down before him. It is perfectly appropriate to bow down to(worship) a king. However, it would have been improper for Nathan to bow down to David and then to someone in David’s court that he knew was plotting against David. “Worship” is not a hollow act. True worship comes from the heart. Thatis why Mordecai would not bow down before Haman, because Haman was an enemy ofthe Jews (Esther 3:2; 9:10). However when Jesus met the women who had come to his tomb, they “worshipped” him and were correct in doing so because he was their king, and they honored and respected him. The act of placing oneself face down at the feet of the king showed respect and honor. 2 Samuel 14:22 provides a good example. 2 Samuel 14:22 Joab fell with his face to the ground to pay him honor [shachah], and he blessed the king. Joab said, “Today your servant knows that he has found favor in your eyes, my lord the king, because the king has granted his servant’s request.” In this verse the NIV translators chose to translate the Hebrew word shachah (bowing down or worshipping) with the phrase “to pay him honor” to reflect the nature of Joab’s actions. Although the phrase “to pay him honor” shows the purpose of Joab’s action, since the Hebrew word shachah is not translated “worship,” the English reader never sees that Joab “worshipped”David. No doubt, had Joab fallen on his face before God, the English translations would have said that Joab “worshipped” God. 1 Samuel 24 contains a record of David “worshipping” Saul. 1 Samuel 24:8 Then David went out of the cave and called out to Saul,“My lord the king!” When Saul looked behind him, David bowed down [shachah] and prostrated himself with his face to the ground. Saul had been pursuing David in order to kill him. David and his men had been avoiding Saul. One time Saul went into a cave to use the bathroom, not realizing that David and his men were also in the cave. David’s men urged him to kill Saul, but instead he simply cut off a piece of Saul’s clothing. After Saul left the cave, David came out and bowed before Saul and showed him the piece of clothing to demonstrate that he would never hurt Saul. David bowed before Saul as part of his effort to convince Saul that he still honored Saul and that he was not trying to usurp Saul’s throne. Bowing to the king, worshipping him, was a way of demonstrating respect to the king,which, of course, meant that the person had an intent to obey the king.Obedience, then, is an integral part of the worship of God or a king. The outward show of bowing is not really true worship if there is no intent in the heart to obey. If a person comes before a king and bows before him but has no intention of obeying him, then the bow is hollow and deceitful. We see this inaction with Adonijah. He bowed before King Solomon but he was still scheming against him. 1 Kings 1:53 Then King Solomon sent men, and they brought him down from the altar. And Adonijah came and bowed [shachah]down to King Solomon, and Solomon said, “Go to your home.” Adonijah was a half-brother of Solomon and had plotted to usurp David’s throne. But Solomon sent word that if Adonijah would do what was right, then Adonijah’s life would be spared. So Adonijah came and worshipped, bowed down to, Solomon the king as an act of honor and respect, implying that he would be obedient.Actually, Adonijah’s gesture was insincere, and he ended up being put to death(1 Kings 2:25). Bowing insincerely would be similar to calling Jesus “Lord” but then not doing what he said to do (Matt. 7:21-23). It should be that the act of worship comes from a heart of worship. This short study should have made it clear that anyone deserving of honor and respect can be“worshipped.” In the biblical culture, the “worship” was evidenced by bowing. However, in our Western society today it is not our custom to bow down to authority figures. Nevertheless, we do honor them, respect them, and in some cases should obey them. If we today honor a notable person by addressing him as “Sir,” singing “For He’s a Jolly Good Fellow” and giving him presents, we do not call that “worship,” but in fact those acts are one way we in Western society would “worship” someone. In modern Western society we “worship” our authority figures differently than biblical people worshipped their authority figures, but the essence of honoring and respecting is the same. We need to understand how the biblical custom of bowing down before someone as an act of worship can be brought into our modern world. If we see that in the biblical culture the act of bowing was the outward form produced by an inward heart of respect and honor, then we are in a position to ask, “How would we today show someone that we respect and honor him?” Here are a few ideas to consider: If we honor and respect a friend, then our actions show that by us focusing on him and not just only on ourselves. Similarly, we show our respect and honor for God and Jesus by giving them our focus, our time and attention. This is especially important when participating in a spiritual or religious function.For example, a person in church should be focused on them instead of allowing his mind to wander to the trials and troubles of life that occupy the rest of the day. If we honor and respect a friend, then we spend time with him, especially doing things that he wants to do. Similarly, we show our respect to God by doing things He wants us to. We should take an inventory of our lives and see what we spend our time doing. Is it something that brings glory to the Lord or is it something that is just fun? For instance, do we spend more time watching TV than doing something that would serve God or the Lord? By simply taking an inventory of our time we can easily identify what is most important to us. If we find that we are not giving enough time to God, then we should make the commitment to change. Biblically,if we “worshipped” the king, we would make an effort to obey him. Jesus said,“If you love me you will keep my commandments.” Often, because we live in an age of grace, Christians forget that there is a Commandments. In fact there are many of them that we need to obey. For example, love your brother (1 John 4:21); pray continually (1 Thess. 5:17); do not lie (Col. 3:9); do not steal(Eph. 4:28). If we say we worship God and Jesus then we should obey them. These suggestions are by no means comprehensive. Every Christian who wants to worship God and the Jesus must find a way in which he can outwardly demonstrate the respect and honor he has in his heart. References : 1. F.Brown, S. Driver, C. Briggs, The Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon( Hendrick son Publishers, Peabody, MA, reprinted 2000), p. 1005. 2.Joseph Thayer, Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (Hendrick son Publishers, Peabody, MA, reprinted 2000), p. 548. =================== More references here : http://discover-the-truth.com/2013/07/06/daniel-713-14-messiah-jesus-god/ http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2007/09/100-challenge.html http://www.angelfire.com/space/thegospeltruth/trinity/articles/jesusworship1.html

Christian’s Tricks : How The Christians Transformed Jesus into GOD/YHWH using a false translation.

Christian’s Tricks : How The Christians Transformed Jesus into GOD/YHWH by using a false translation.

This essay will EASILY expose THE Magic/Trick used on how Christians DECEITFULLY and SUCCESSFULLY duped innocent folks into believing that Jesus is the same as YHWH / God. How they transformed Jesus as “God/YHWH” using a simple trick (Fallacy of equivocation).

“and in their greed they will exploit you with false words;.” (2 Peter 2:3 NIV ).

Much of the Trinitarian deception is afforded by word trickery. It is a clever word game that uses the same words but shifts the definitions attached to those words; it is a game that shifts the concepts behind those letters. This game of concept shifting is best demonstrated with the fallacious “Jesus is God” routine. This statement means two different things in Trinitarianism and Trinitarians shift back and forth-between both meanings when promoting their apologetic. At one moment, “Jesus is God” means “Jesus is divine by nature” and in the next moment it means “Jesus is God by identity.” One statement answers “what” he is and the other “who” he is. Indeed, leading Trinitarian scholars insist the words “and the Word was God” at John 1:1mean “and the Word was divine by nature.” In fact, the word “God” necessarily means “divine by nature” for the Trinitarian at John 17:3. In other words, they try to make sure the word “God” does not refer to an identity. Trinitarians do the same thing in the statement, “Jesus is both God and man.” Here,the word “man” refers to Jesus’ nature and so does the word “God.” The statement actually means, “Jesus is both divine by nature and human by nature.” It is a statement referring to “what” Jesus is. Trinitarians continually change definitions between implicitly defining “God” as “who” and then implicitly defining “God” as “what” during their argumentation. Fallacy of equivocation. Words have concepts behind them. These concepts can be deceptively shifted by false teachers like a moving curtain behind a scene. Perhaps you have seen old movies where a car is not really moving but the scene behind them is moving and so it appears the car is moving. It is a clever illusion, a deception. Written words themselves do not contain their own concepts but are given concepts by the human beings using those sets of letters. The concepts are behind the written words. Concepts, definitions, are attached to those words. When human beings see written letters on a page, or hear audible words spoken, they must assume the concept which is being attached to a word. So if one says, “I was chairman of the board,” we know the word “board”has a certain concept attached to it that is quite different than, “I was hit over the head by a board. “In such a case, it is quite easy to see there are two different concepts attached to an identical set of letters. We simply changed the scene behind the word because the context demanded it. Both words are appear exactly the same to our eyes and sound the same to our ears but the concepts behind the words are very, very different. In this case, it was quite easy to see the difference. But this is not always the case. Sometimes, when we are speaking with someone, they will use a definition of a word that means one thing and we are assuming another thing. Such is the case with the statement, “Jesus is God. “When English speaking readers see the word “God” they immediately assume that someone is being identified because the capitalized word “God” looks and behaves like a name and we use names to identify people and implicitly answer a question which begins with “Who?  “However, Trinitarians use the very same word to mean “Who” in one breath and to mean something entirely different in the next. The Trinitarian apologetic is largely based on the idea that Jesus has a divine nature, that is, the nature of deity. This idea refers to what he is, not who he is. However, Trinitarians use the statement, “Jesus is God” to make the assertion that Jesus is divine by nature. This is extremely deceptive because people are duped into believing Jesus is being identified as “God” because English speakers have been trained to assume someone is being identified when they see a capitalized word that looks and behaves like a capitalized name. Trinitarians afford this word game by shifting back and forth between both concepts and few people ever notice the difference. What Trinitarians try to do is demonstrate that Jesus has a divine nature by using the statement, “Jesus is God. “Here they are referring to “what” he is, not “who” he is. There is no problem in doing this as long as their line of argumentation is correct. However, once they are successful in accomplishing their goal, they then proceed to conclude that have proved “Jesus is God” but now they suggestively imply they have proved Jesus is God by identity. They wish to claim they have proved Jesus is the one God who created the universe. Hence, they suggest that since they have proved what he is, they have proved who he is by using the very same words. In short, they deceive others by shifting the concept behind the words implicitly and suggestively whenever it is convenient for them to do so. The extent of this deceptive illusion can be demonstrated from a Biblical truth. When God created Adam and Eve, He named them both “adam” (Gen 1:27; 5:2). The word“adam” is the Hebrew word for humanity, human being, both male and female. It is essentiallyequivalent to our English word “human.” So we can say “Eve was adam” which means “Eve was human.” It refers to Eve’s human nature. However, as soon as we say “Eve was Adam,” we are making a huge mistake because the capitalized word “Adam” refers to Eve’s husband and is not a word used to refer to Eve’s human nature. The word “Adam” answers the question “Who?” The word “adam” answers the question“What?” However, Trinitarians succeed in using the capitalized word “God” to identify God and to refer to the divine nature of God. The parallel use of the word “Adam” would be to use that capitalized word to refer both to Eve’s nature and to Eve’s husband. So if we used the word “Adam” like Trinitarians use the word “God” we could say “Eve was “Adam” meaning Eve was human. And then once we have proved Eve was human with the words “Eve was Adam,” we would then proceed to claim Eve is to be identified as “Adam.” And we would be quite dishonest to do so. This is what Trinitarians are doing with the capitalized word “God.” Illustrating the Deception: Qualitative and Quantiative Terms The word adam is the Hebrew word for “human,” whether male or female. Adam was actually called “the adam” in the Bible just as God was called “the god.” Thus, Adam was adam, Eve was adam, and Seth was adam. Adam was human, Eve was human and Seth was human. The word adam is here used in a qualitative sense. It is also correct to write, “Adam was Adam.” This is a quantitative use of the same word. It sounds the same as the qualitative sense but the capital letter changed the intent of the word from qualitative to quantitative. Since Adam is quantitatively the person Adam, we can say Adam is Adam. However, it is completely incorrect to say, “Eve was Adam,” or “Seth was Adam.” This would be a totally inappropriate use of English capitalization conventions and would mislead the reader into thinking that Eve and/or Seth are being identified as the person Adam. So while we can write, “Eve was adam,” we cannot write “Eve was Adam.” Hence, to be honest and true to readers we must ensure that we do not capitalize the word “adam” when we are using the word in a qualitative sense. The word “adam” is not a name but the word “Adam” is a name. Although they sound the same they signal different ideas. The very same thing is true with the word “God.” Although it sounds like a qualitative word when spoken, it behaves like a name and signals a quantiative entity when written.  The word “God” is just as misleading as the word “Adam” when the word “god” is intended instead just as the word “adam” is intended instead.


Note carefully how a capital letter changed everything. A capitalized word in English has much power and suggestive meaning and the misuse of capitalization can lead to quietly constructed yet tremendous blunders.


The Power of Suggestion Quantitative names identifying persons sound exactly like qualitative words describing attributes.  The statement, “It is Sandy” sounds just like “It is sandy.” However, these two statements mean two completely different things and if we misuse these terms we commit the deceptive fallacy of equivocation. In the same way, “Jesus is god” meaning “Jesus is divine by nature,” sounds just like “Jesus is God,” meaning “Jesus is that personal being God by identity. “Saying “Jesus is god” is the same as saying “Eve was adam” and saying “Jesus is God” is the same as saying, “Eve was Adam.” Therefore, if we were speaking out loud to someone they would not even know the difference between those two statements. So if a Trinitarian demonstrates Jesus was god and then proceeds to claim he has proven that Jesus was God, and since you cannot see the capital letter that is spoken and not written, a person listening to such words could be easily duped. And even worse, the written statement “Jesus is God,” meaning “Jesus is divine,” is identical to “Jesus is God,” meaning “Jesus is God by identity.” They are identical statements which mean two different things. There are two different concepts behind the words. The two statements both sound and look exactly the same but convey concepts which describe two completely different ideas.  This is how Trinitarians do their trickery. They claim Jesus is divine by nature by saying, and writing, “Jesus is God” when they are referring to his nature. However, this has exactly the same ring to human ears, and to the human mind which hears these words when read, as the statement “Jesus is God” when used to indicate who the Word was by identity. So Trinitarians suggestively imply they have proved Jesus is “God” by identity and because the two statements look, sound, and have the exact same ring for both meanings of “Jesus is God”, this illusion is quite persuasive and subtlely effective. Hence, innocent folks are easily duped by this fallacy. Having the divine nature of God does not make one God by identity anymore than having the nature of Adam makes one Adam by identity. In fact, the Bible explicitly teaches that we too will share the divine nature of God when we are resurrected. This does not mean we will be God. In fact, the Bible teaches explicitly that we are already partakers of the divine nature. This does not make us “God” anymore than it makes Jesus “God.” The capitalized word “God” is a word which translates “the god” in Greek and is reserved for the Father of Jesus Christ. This is but one example of the many fallacies employed by Trinitarians. When exploring Trinitarian doctrine and when dialoguing with Trinitarians, one must be extremely guarded and careful concerning their statements and their crafty terminology. The suggestively shift the meanings of words like “God” and “being” halfway through their argumentation process. The result is a completely fallacious conclusion that sounds totally correct to the unwary listener who is thereby left completely deceived by their illusions.

The Six Major Sins Of Jesus!!!!

The Six Major Sins Of Jesus!!

[ Note : In my previous engagement with some Christians I found out that most of them keep on babbling with a hollow, unsound claim  that “Jesus is a sinless” . But when I asked what is “SIN” from Biblical perspective? No answer from them. Thus, I deem it proper educate some educated fools as to what really “sin” is from Biblical perspective thru this LINK  ]

Now some of my friends are probably disgusted with me right now just from the title of this note alone!
But it seems that no matter how much proof I show them from the bible that Jesus was not divine, that Jesus was not sinless, that Jesus was not a part of any Holy Trinity, or that Jesus is NOT GOD, they still can not allow rational/logical thought to lead them past the  brainwashing that most of the Christians have incurred since birth.
Now, I have a question for you. So that my question will not go over your head, I will ask a similar logical question first:
Let’s say you asked me to take your credit card and pay your cellular phone bill. When I arrive at the store and they swipe your card, there is absolutely no money in your account.
Now when I call you and say,
“Hey, man, there is no money in your account.”
Your response to me is:
“Yeah, I know, it’s been empty for a month.”
The logical question would be,
“If it was impossible for me to pay your bill, then what was the point of sending me to the phone company?”
I’m sure each of you would agree, that this is a logical question right? So let’s apply that same logic to Jesus being without sin:
“If it was impossible for Jesus to have sinned, then what was the point of the stories about Jesus being tempted by worldly things or being tempted by Satan? ??? hmmmm…. 
Do you get it now? Same logical question applies here too!
How could Jesus be tempted in all-points to sin as we are, yet Christian scholars can keep a straight face and say Jesus was without sin (Hebrews 4:15)?
For common sense logic, would dictates that a deity cannot even be tempted at all right? Do you see how ridiculous the dogma becomes when you analyze Christian’s falsehoods?
Christians claim that Satan’s temptations had no effect on Jesus because with him also being 100% God, there wasn’t even the slightest chance Jesus could have sinned.

Really?Then you educated fools, WHAT THEN would be the point? Good grief!

If that is true, then there would be no temptation and the whole story of Jesus’ being tempted, would be absolutely pointless and STUPID
However, Jesus was tempted. We all know this right?
But how can this be? Seeing that our Pastors and the Impostor Paul claim that Jesus is also God? For the bible clearly says:
James 1:12
12 Blessed is the man(human) that endures temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.

13 Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for (God cannot be tempted with evil,) neither tempt he any man: 

Are you finally beginning to understand how flawed their exegesis/hypothesis theology really is?

Many educated fools will say Jesus was:

                           “100%fully God and 100% fully man.
This has to be the most asinine statement educated men could make. Because if 100% of something is considered full, how can you put another 100% more of something into it?
Now they actually want us to believe, Jesus was 100% ALL MAN.
Yet they want to add stipulations to their theology and say this all-man Jesus did not have man’s nature to sin, lust, get angry, and want to punch someone in the face, or have sexual lustful impure thoughts and get an ERECTION, after looking at the breast or beauty of a woman?
If Jesus is 100% all man, then he must also have 100% of man’s nature for sin too!
Sorry folks you cannot have it both ways!

So I must then pose the question, Did this alleged member of the Trinity ever commit any sins on earth?To that I must say YES HE DID! 

So, in no particular order, I will list the 6 MAJOR SINS of Jesus along with the VERSES that prove my assertion is true.
Pay close attention to the  highlighted words,and the capitalized words. They are very important.
So let’s begin:

#01: Jesus, like most Hebrews Jews, was a Bigot and a Racist Separatist who did not like Greek and Roman Gentiles! 


The Merriam-Webster dictionary’s definition of Bigot is:


noun \ˈbi-gət\
: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group)
No I’m sure the closed-minded  have either closed the pages of this note now! I’m sure even you are saying how on earth could Jesus be a bigot?
Well we are told by Paul and the Gentiles that the dark-skinned Hebrew Prophet Yeshua, who witnessed the heinous crimes against the Jews, died for their sins too!

So they want you and I to believe that Yeshua, who witnessed the heinous crimes against the Jews, was such a loving messiah, that he turned the other cheek to the oppression, the murders, the rapes and tortures and wanted to teach these HEATHEN unclean murderous pagans dogs about their God?Really? Heck no!

Jesus, like all oppressed Hebrews HATED the GENTILES MURDERERS! 
In fact to this very day, the Gentiles are still called filthy

Gentile INFIDEL Dogs!

So what does the bible really say about Jesus and the Gentiles?
Did Jesus die for their sins or did Jesus NOT want them to have salvation?
The truth will shock you! Let’s see (Pay attention to the highlighted words!):

Mark 4:11-12

(Jesus) said to them, to you (Jews) it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God;

 but to outsiders(GENTILES), all these things are done in parables: That they (GENTILES) may see, and not perceive; and they (GENTILES) may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they (GENTILES) should be converted, and their(GENTILES) sins should be forgiven them.

Oh my Jesus!!!! Tell us how you really feel! Christians don’t want any part of this verse!
HMM? Did you catch that?
Did you see how angry and vengeful the human original Jesus actual was? Come on? Did you hear Jesus explain the reason why he speaks in parables instead of just teaching straight truth?
He says, and I quote: This is done so they can hear God’s word but to make sure they don’t understand it?What the heck!!!!
You mean to tell me, that this man Jesus doesn’t want people to be saved? YEP, you heard it straight from Jesus’ own mouth folks!
Human Jesus is out of control folks!
Jesus tells His Disciples:

Don’t teach these GENTILE DOGS the TRUTH, lest at anytime they might be “CONVERTED/CHANGE AND their SINS, SINS, SINS, SINS, be “FORGIVEN THEM?” Wow! Wow! Wow!

There is a saying in the military that goes:
Kill them all and let God sort them out!”
Jesus echoes this sentiment totally!
So Jesus didn’t want these GENTILES SINS to ever be FORGIVEN?Proving that the dying on the cross for everyone dogma is ridiculous! YEP folks! You heard this straight from JESUS’ own mouth! Amazing isn’t it?
Does this sound like someone who wants to DIE for the sins of these dogs???

For it shows the true JESUS/YESHUA, who lived through the horrors of Greece and Rome and Caesar had absolutely no love whatsoever for any of these Gentile oppressive dogs and never wanted them to learn about the Most High God and wanted them to actually DIE an excruciating miserable death! You just can’t make this stuff up! It’s all clearly written in the bible for us to see!
Jesus openly says:

Matthew 7:6 Do not give what is holy (SCRIPTURES) to (GENTILES) dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine(GENTILES), or they(GENTILES) will trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you (JEWSto pieces.

So in true essence Jesus tells his Disciples and followers;“Give not the salvation providing holy scriptures unto these unclean GENTILE DOGS! And do not throw or (TEACH) your pearls of “wisdom/knowledge” to these murderous swine!”

Now I see why Jesus compared himself later on in the scriptures to JONAS;
Jesus was just as rebellious as he was!
Now we have Jesus admitting why he spoke in parables. It was so the Gentile nations would not be able to repent and be saved!
As you can see, I didn’t make any of this up!
You read it for yourself and this is truly a sinful nature of Jesus no one ever talks about!
Jesus was in fact a prejudiced-bigot who was not willing to forgive these people for their crimes against the Jews and did not want any of his Disciples to go into any of their lands to teach them anything concerning their God and Salvation!
Jesus says:
Matthew 10:5
These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans.

Matthew 10:6 Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel. 7 As you go, proclaim this message: ‘The kingdom of heaven has come near.’

So clearly Jesus wanted the LOST SHEEP of Israel only to be saved both from the hands of Greece and Rome and saved in the form of repentance of sins!

No Gentiles allowed here folks! A definite sin against God’s word!
Now do you think I am still stretching this a bit? Well let’s go a bit farther and see what happens when an actual GENTILE woman comes seeking YHWH the God of the Jews through Jesus.
Surely the Jesus we all heard about will quickly come to this Gentile woman’s rescue right? WRONG!!!

The Faith of a Canaanite Woman

MATTHEW 15:22  A Canaanite (GENTILE) woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is demon-possessed and suffering terribly.”
Now surely Jesus will stop to rescue this damsel in distress right? Let’s see:

MATTHEW 15:23 
23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.”

Now let’s play the “Jesus advocate” here and say that it was too noisy and Jesus didn’t hear this woman’s pleas for help. Well according to the above verse the Disciples heard it and were annoyed at this Gentile dog following them.

Notice they didn’t say master this woman needs help, Ooooh no! They asked Jesus if he would finally send this unclean Gentile woman away !Unbelievable!

So what do you think Jesus our so-called savior of sins reply was to his Disciples about her? Let’s see:

MATTHEW 15:24  
He (JESUS) answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.”

Come on? This cannot be? So Jesus agreed with the Disciples and refused to help her and openly states that He was not sent to help any of these Gentiles Dogs but was sent ONLY, ONLY, ONLY to the lost sheep of Israel! How on earth will Christians get past this admission by Jesus?

Now apparently the woman wasn’t accepting Jesus’ answer to leave and wasn’t giving up! Let’s see what happens next:

MATTHEW 15:25 The woman (GENTILE) came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said.

Now we see this woman has skipped over the Disciples and is kneeling down in front of Jesus. If a Hebrew woman who simply touched the hem of his garment can be healed surely Jesus is not going to not heed to the pleas of a woman who is falling in front of him on her knees begging right? What do you think Jesus’ reply to her was? Let’s see:
MATTHEW 15:26  He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread (KNOWLEDGE/SALVATION) and toss it to the (GENTILE) dogs.”

OH MY GOSH!!!!  I am shaking my head right now in shame!

                               Say it ‘aint so Jesus? Say it ‘aint so!

Jesus hatred for these murderous Gentiles is clouding his judgment! This is probably why Hebrews 5 says Jesus suffered because he was DIS-obedient!
Now something Godly happened next! Do you remember the Pulp Fiction movie phrase:
“I’m about to go medieval on him?”
Well this Gentile woman, did something similar and she went biblical on Jesus! Let’s see!
MATTHEW 15:27  But she said, “Yes, Lord; but even the (GENTILE)dogs feed on the crumbs which fall from their MASTER’S(YHWH)’ table.” 
This woman knew more about the God of the JEWS than Jesus thought! When Jesus said no to her, this woman invoked the TORAH and the LAWS of Moses on Jesus which says if the GENTILES come to any Hebrew Jew and seeks their God they are to fully comply and be a light to the Gentiles and teach them Salvation and the ways of God’s law:
EXODUS 12:48  And when a stranger (GENTILE)shall sojourn with thee, and will keep the passover to the Lord, let all his (GENTILE)males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land: for no uncircumcised(GENTILE) person shall eat thereof.
49 One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the (GENTILE) stranger that sojourneth among you. 
But the stranger (GENTILE)that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.
So as you can see the GENTILES always had the right to salvation long before Paul’s version of Jesus ever came on the scene!
So by using the scriptures above, the Gentile woman forced Jesus’ hand and he had no choice but to heal the woman!
I want to believe this story was an eye opener to Jesus; for he did say afterwards that her faith was strong and he did finally heal her daughter. Let’s hope so.

#02: The BOOK of HEBREWS admits that JESUS the HIGH PRIEST, was originally a SINFUL MAN!

Hebrews 5:1
For every high priest taken from among men is ordained for men in things pertaining to God, that he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins:
Who can have compassion on the ignorant, and on them that are out of the way; for that he himself also is compassed with infirmity (SINS).
And by reason hereof he ought, as for the people, so also for HIMSELF, to offer for sins.
And no man taketh this honour unto himself, but HE that is CALLED of God, as was Aaron.
So far as you can see, the writer explains that the High Priest not only has to offer sacrifices to God for the sins of the people, but notice in verse two, it clearly states that EVERY single High priest also is filled with his “OWN” sins just like you and I.

Again people, clearly Verse 03 finishes the summarizes the writer’s thoughts that this Chosen High Priest ALSO has to offer sins for HIS OWN sins too.Did you get that? his OWN sins too! 

Lastly, vs.01 and vs 04 tells us that all of these SIN-FILLED men are HUMAN and are CHOSEN by God to be a High Priest. So how does this apply to Jesus you ask?  Well the writer explains how these SINS apply to Jesus in the next verses!
 Hebrews 5:5: So also Christ (JESUS) glorified not himself to be made an high priest;
but HE/GOD that said unto him, Thou(JESUS)art my Son, (TODAY)have I (BEGOTTEN/CHOSEN) thee(JESUS)!
WOW!!!! Did you get that? Now we know why it took 325 years for the Roman church to add Jesus into the Trinity! For clearly the bible says, Jesus only became a “SON” of God only afterGOD CHOSE/BEGOT him on that VERY DAY!
Which proves the “Before ABRAHAM; I AM” scripture(John 8:58). was an added lie by some  false Pro-Trinity ghostwriter!
As you can see, these are not my words! These words are in every single Christian New Testament bible.

But that is not all!

There is much more REVEALING information a few verses down! Let’s take a look!
Hebrews 5:7 Who in the days of his flesh, when he(JESUS) had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto him/GOD that was able to save him from death, and was HEARD in that he feared;
WAIT a moment! Did you catch this SECRET scripture that someone FORGOT to edit out of the bible?

Read the verse again as I explain what it just said.

When Jesus was in his flesh, i.e. STILL ALIVE,
When he had offered up prayers in the Garden of Gethsemane unto God and BEGGED and PLEADED for God to SAVE him from DYING,
 The scripture tells us that Jesus’ prayers TO BE SAVED from DEATH were eventually HEARD by God?
Oh My! Yes, I already know what your next question is:

“Are you telling me that GOD spared Jesus from dying on the cross? 

I am not telling you anything! The BIBLE just told you this was the truth!
Forgotten verses like these gives validity to books like:
                    “The Da Vinci Code and Holy Blood Holy Grail.”
Now though these two books are very good. There is a wonderful new book that confirms the story of Hebrews and says Jesus in fact did escape death upon the cross. This insightful and controversial book is called

                 Jesus: The Rise of the Nazarene!


This book is available at all book sites. Hear is the Amazon.com link to it.
Now, as far as the SINS of Jesus, the next two verses are DEVASTATING the the theology of Rome and speaks about Jesus’ sins!
 Hebrews 5:8: Though he/JESUS were )Son, yet LEARNED he(JESUS) OBEDIENCE by the things which he SUFFERED;

OH! OH! OH! I had to interrupt! Clearly read that again!

For in retrospect, the writer tells us that human Jesus was not “THE” one and only son from a Trinity-esque heaven. This writer’s original thoughts before editing by Rome, was that Jesus was nothing more than “A” mere son of God; just like all the other sons/prophets of God like King David or Isaiah which God also begat/chose as His sons also.
That is very damaging to the Trinity doctrine, but look at even more damaging information in verse 08!

It says, Jesus had to LEARN how to OBEY GOD by the things which he suffered. Wow! Clearly before the biblical editing of the bible, the writer originally believed that Jesus was SINFUL and that GOD punished Jesus and made him SUFFER because of his LACK of OBEDIENCE! Again I didn’t make any of this up. You read the verse on your own!

Now we all know that this Greek written text has the Roman-ized version of Jesus disobeying God, changing God’s laws and seemingly rebelling against God’s laws. Now could these actions be considered sinful? Yes they can! What laws of God did these writers have Jesus change? Let’s see:
·       Who declared all foods to be clean? (Greco-Roman Jesus!)
·       Who went against God’s rules on fasting?(Greco-Roman Jesus!)
·       Who went against the rules on divorce? (Greco-Roman Jesus!)
·       Who altered or ignored God’s dietary laws?(Greco-Roman Jesus!)
·       Who went against God’s rules concerning the Sabbath? (Greco-Roman Jesus!)
·       Who went against God’s rules on adultery?(Greco-Roman Jesus!)
·       Who went against the washing of hands before dining?  (Greco-Roman Jesus!)

So think about it? These Greek and Roman writings want us to believe that A HEBREW who told you in Matthew 5:17, 18, 19 that he did NOT COME to change any of the laws of Moses would suddenly do all of these evil things against God? Really? HECK NO! Unless he is guilty of sinning against God!

Christians claim Jesus is God, but if God gave the law to Moses, and then God/Jesus comes down and “changes” the laws of Moses, that means God is a liar, because the bible clearly says that God does “not change?
Malachi 3:6
I am the LORD and I do not change. That is why you descendants of Jacob are not already destroyed.

Knowing this then, clearly if Jesus taught all of the above things God would bring wrath down upon him like the book of Hebrews is saying!

Let’s get back to Hebrews shall we:

Now after God punishes Jesus, apparently Jesus, like the Jews, finally got the point! Jesus then repents of his sins and God forgives him and Jesus is cleansed/sanctified of all unrighteousness and therefore is made “perfect!”

Hebrews 5:9 And being made perfect (cleansed), he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;

So in finishing the author’s thoughts, Jesus endured his beating, and torture because of his OWN SINS and disobedience. Now according to verse 09, after God SAVED Jesus and FORGAVE Him of His OWN sins, Jesus was SANCTIFIED/CLEANSED of his own sins.

(personal note:) Pay close attention to the sanctified/cleansed of his sins words I just used. Later, I will give you Jesus’ own words where he verifies this fact.
The final words of vs. 09 says that after this sanctification of sins process,
Jesus, now son/prophet of God then BECAME the author/teacher/rabbi of eternal salvation to all that would listen and obey him. Are you FINALLY understanding the truth yet? Jesus clearly sinned! Let’s move on.
#03: JESUS ADMITS that He was a normal son of man that also has SINS like all men!!

John 10:36

‘Say ye of him(Jesus), whom the Father hath sanctified(Cleansed of sins), and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I (Jesus) said, I am the Son of God?”
WOW! Most Pastors and Theologian will get so angry at you for mentioning the above verse.
01. Jesus  by his OWN ADMISSION,was not sinless !
02, This type of knowledge will affect their profit margins!
But I’m sorry, If our own teacher, Jesus admits that he also was a sinful man, how can we claim he was sinless or 100% man and also 100% God Which is Ridiculous now that we’ve heard Jesus contradicting it right?

John 17:19 And for their sakes I sanctify (Cleansed of sins), myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth.

Now some may say:
“See Jesus is God because he sanctified himself!”
No, this is not saying he is God! It is saying that he is merely atoning for his own SINS like the book of Hebrews says the High Priests also does by cleansing himself, and repenting from his wicked ways.
The other sons of God the Levites and the High Priest also cleansed/sanctified themselves and turned from their sins in the verse below:

 2 Chronicles 30:15 Then they killed the passover on the fourteenth day of the second month: and the priests and the Levites were ashamed, and (sanctified themselves,) and brought in the burnt offerings into the house of the Lord.

So as you can see from the verse above, even the Levites and you and I too can sanctify ourselves and stop sinning! Do you finally understand?

Now we all heard of John the Baptist or John the Baptizer right? Well as you already know the practice of water baptism was already in effect. For the purpose of baptism was for one to be cleanse from all of their sins. This is also spoken of in the book of Matthew:

Mathew 3:5: Then went out to him Jerusalem, and all Judaea, and all the region round about Jordan,And were baptized of him in Jordan, confessing their sins.Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance:

So there is no debate there about the purpose of baptism and we all know that Jesus also knew the purpose

The Baptism of Jesus
According to the New Testament, baptism is a command, not an option (see, e.g., Mt 28:19; Ac 10:28).  Baptism is a deed, an act of “works”, which consists of a full immersion in water. What is the purpose of baptism?
·         Belief and baptism are required for salvation. (Mark16:16)
·         Repentance and baptism are for the remission of sins. (Acts 2:38)
·         Baptism washes away sins. (Acts 22:16)
·         Baptism brings salvation. (1 Peter 3:21)
  Baptism is a public testimony of faith in Jesus. [Ro 6:3; 1 Cor 12:13; Gal 3:27]  (THE LIES OF PAUL!)
This list embodies the ongoing conflict in the New Testament between “works” and “faith” as a path to salvation.
The first four items reflect the position of the apostle James, Jesus’ very own brother and “HAND-TAUGHT” Disciple that “… faith without works is dead …” (Ja 2:26[KJV]).
The last item reflects the false view of the lying false prophet, the apostle Paul, that “… by grace are ye saved through faith; … Not of works lest …” (Eph 2:8-9[KJV]).  However, there is a much more serious issue here than just this internal contradiction of Paul’s foolish writings.
The New Testament records the accounts of Jesus coming to be baptized by John the Baptizer (Mt 3:13-15; Mk 1:9; Lk 3:21).
Now you guys already know from other postings that I believe these gospels have been edited over and over again by the Romans.
For even the baptism story is flawed and told in contradictory versions. However, the account in the Gospel of Matthew tells us that John “allegedly” questions the need for Jesus to be baptized by him. Yet if one reads on, Jesus clearly shows us that he like all sinners had to be baptized because

Matthew 3:15: “… thus it becometh us(Jesus) to fulfill all righteousness …

In other words, Jesus himself wanted to demonstrate how to have sins removed and obtain salvation.
Wow! So what part of this is still confusing to any of us now? Notice Jesus is not in conflict with the Torah teachings or with his own knowledge of his sins? The only conflict is with the Satanic Roman version of a sinless Jesus to take away our sins?

Conclusion:  Jesus did not consider himself sinless.

Now you read that Jesus told us that He too was CLEANSE/Sanctified and sent into the world. It happened during this process and this is when Jesus finally became ” A” son of God. This process isn’t new, For God sanctified/cleansed Isaiah’ sins with a hot coal!

Isaiah 6:5 Then said I, Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts.

Then flew one of the Seraphims (ANGELS) unto me, having a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with the tongs from off the altar: 7 And he laid it upon my mouth, and said, Lo, this hath touched thy lips; and thine INIQUITY/SINS is taken away, and thy SINS purged.

So clearly, God was forgiving sins LONG before, the Greeks gave us their FALSE gospel text which they claim Jesus came to die for every one’s sins.So sad really!

Let’s continue. Now just like Jesus and Isaiah, another son of God, Jeremiah also admits to this same sin-cleansing/sanctification process too!

 Jeremiah 1:5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou came forth out of the womb I sanctified/CLEANSED thee, and I ordained thee a prophet(SON OF GOD) unto the nations.

As much as I dislike Paul, even his writings tell us how one becomes ” A” son of God:

Romans 15:16 That I should be the minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles, ministering the gospel of God, that the offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy Ghost.

So he too claims he was sanctified/CLEANSED of his sins by the Holy Spirit/GOD. He also teaches others the process of how God prepares one to become ” A” son of GOD below:

2nd  Timothy 2:21 If a man therefore purge himself from these, (SINS)he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified/CLEANSED and meet for the master’s use, and prepared unto every good work.

Once again, even this verse says that Jesus, the Levites and you and I can repent and purge ourselves from our own sins and then God can begat/choose us as his sons and be used for the “MASTER’S USE” to do good works unto the Lord, Amen!

Now since you have read the verses on your own, the Pastor’s can no longer tell deceive you any longer.

Conclusion: JESUS sinned and repented!
Are there any more SINS that Jesus committed? Yes, many more! Let’s look below:

Now, I’m sure, some of you are saying I am crazy and that Jesus was a peaceful man who never did any harm to anyone. Yet the bible clearly shows us that Jesus was guilty of sinning, by allowing Satan to cloud his judgment when he became angry at the money changers in the temple:
John 1:13: And the Jews’ passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.
14 And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting:
Okay let’s stop here a moment. It is Passover and Jesus saw the money changers sitting at the temple selling oxen, sheep and doves.
Now was anything wrong with them being there? 

Absolutely not!

For the money changers were supposed to be at the temple!
According to God’s word, thou shalt have no GRAVEN IMAGES inside of the temple. On the currency of the times, Caesar’s face was engraved on the coins so the money was not allowed inside of the temple, hence the purpose for the money changers.
Now although the writer of John doesn’t say these men were doing anything insincere outside of performing their normal duties, we can assume from the other gospel stories, that they may have been cheating the people in some way.
Let’s assume this is true and Jesus discovered this, what is a law-abiding citizen such as Jesus supposed to do in this situation hmm? He is supposed to go to the authorities, such as the high priest, the Levites, the temple guards, the Grecian soldiers, or anyone in command and report the alleged crimes that he witnessed.
Does Jesus do just that? Oh noooooo! Jesus becomes outraged at what he allegedly witnesses.
Jesus then becomes psycho; taking the LAW into his own hands!
Let’s see what he did:
John 1:15:
15 And when he (Jesus) had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers’ money, and overthrew the tables;16 And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father’s house an house of merchandise.
So instead of being obedient to the governing laws,or reporting the thieves to the proper authorities, Jesus decides to become as a thug and invoked his own sort of vigilante mob justice and began to assault these men and scourged/beat them up with a painful corded whip. What a HYPOCRITE!
Now when the vigilante mob attempted to do the same thing Jesus did and wanted to stone the woman for her alleged injustice, Jesus prevented them from doing so, yet he is hypocritical when it comes to his own vigilante anger? Really?
So its okay for Jesus to take the law into his own hands in mob vigilante justice, but everyone else should turn the other cheek? Yeah, Whatever!
After assaulting the men, Jesus then caused property damage and destroyed their livelihood and overthrew their tables, causing all of their animals to escape. Then in anger, he tossed all of their money onto the ground possibly causing all of the people in attendance to break the commandments by stealing their coins and property. Total sin here folks!
If you or I would have done this, we would have been in jail for assault and battery.  Now how sad is this?
Seeing the sins Jesus committed in the temple, the ghost writer of John made a ridiculous attempt at damage control by trying to justify Jesus’ crimes by inventing an Old Testament prophecy when there was none:
John 1:17
17 And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. 

What the???? So, this is the best that this ghost writer can come up with as justification for Jesus’ criminal behavior?

Now, the quoted Old Testament verse this writer uses isn’t even a prophecy at all, it is a prayer of David about his own disobedience to God and how his enemies are attacking his kingdom. For the Psalms states in true context:
Psalms 69:9
For the Zeal of thine house hath eaten me up: and the “reproaches” of them (enemies) that reproached thee are fallen upon me (King David).
Like I said earlier, the Roman Empire’s Popes, Bishops, Cardinals, and Scribes, never thought that the common man and woman would ever have personal copies and access to the written word. So these errors and lies were of little concern as long as the money continued to flow into their coffers.
Now many Christians will still attempt to justify this by saying, they were in his Father’s house and cheating the people.
As I have said, if this is true, Jesus still had no authority to go against man’s law because the high priest was the main figure in charge that was standing in authority and who Jesus also was subjected to; especially when man’s laws are not in contradiction to God’s laws. Even Paul knew this and stated this fact:
Romans 13:1-3
“Let every person be subject to the governing authorities.
For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.
Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad.”
So even Paul, in some of his rare good days occasionally taught sound doctrine.
Notice Paul says we and JESUS, are to be subjected to governing authorities, and not take the law into our own hands.
Jesus ignored this truth, even though he himself taught this same truth to the people when he said the following words:
He sinned when He used

Luke 20:25:
He (Jesus) said to them, “Then render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”
Clearly Jesus knew right from wrong, but allowed his SINFUL nature to get the better of him.
In fact Jesus contradicts his own actions in the following verse below:
“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’
39 But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.
40 If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also.
41 And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two. 42 Give to him who asks you, and from him who wants to borrow from you do not turn away.”
Really Jesus? So if someone wants to take away our tunic, let them have it and give him my cloak too?
  • But you beat the hell out of the money changers?
  • Why didn’t you let them have the money and the DOVES TOO? That is what you taught right?

So I guess the rules does not apply to you huh?

I think this enough proof for this subject.Instead of calling the authorities, violent radical thug Jesus is above the law huh?

Conclusion: Jesus sinned against these money changers!

Let’s move on…

#05: JESUS was a overweight gluttonous alcoholic lush who was originally the life of the party!

Man, I can hear the statements!
Now on the surface I know you think I am attacking Jesus. But I’m not. I am merely showing you how the Greco-Roman church is guilty of the first instances of “photo-shopping” a person’s image from the normal human nature.

Now folks, what was Jesus’ occupation? He was a carpenter right? This means Jesus was either

  • A typical muscular hard working blue collar construction worker


  • An overweight butt crack showing blue collar construction worker.


Now, if he was the heavy tool wielding construction worker type. This would definitely fit in with the strong radical Jesus who said He didn’t come for “PEACE” but to cause division. This would also negate the weak and feeble looking Jesus that the Roman Church portrays hanging on the cross which garners such sympathy from us. The strong radical and defiant Jesus would be able to defend himself and beat the heck out of the money changers in the temple. Now the Romans can’t have that can they? I mean their  “die for your sins” Jesus has to be weak, and humble as a lamb for us to cheer right? The photo below is how Rome wanted us to see Jesus.


So we know, this strong defiant  type of Jesus can never be spoken of!

So let’s go to the other scenario below: Fat Jesus!


Like most hard working construction workers, I’m sure Jesus drank and let off steam too. Now, we all have been led to believe that Jesus hung out with sinners to convert them. That may not have always been the case.
Let’s look at the scriptures:
Mat 11:19
The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners.
Sounds as if Jesus was the life of the party huh?
We know at the wedding of Cana, when they ran out of wine for the party, Jesus saved the day by turning ordinary wine into the best tasting wine!
Yep, Jesus saved the day and the people were able to do what party people do! Drink excessively, Party, get frisky, get horny, and have drunken sexual relations!
After making this good ‘ole wine, can’t you hear the thankful party people saying:

“Go Jesus! Go Jesus! Go Jesus! Go Jesus! Cause ‘aint no party like a Hebrew party cause a Hebrew party don’t stop!”

Now the record is made in Matt. 11, that one of the “accusations” that came against Jesus by the Pharisees, was that he was a “glutton”.
You do not accuse skinny people of being “gluttons”.
From phagos {fag’-os}
 AV – gluttonous 2; 2
 1) a voracious man, a glutton
 from phago {fag’-o} n m
 a primary verb (used as an alternate of 2068 in certain tenses);;
Translated:  eat 94, meat (noun) 3; 97, as in “meaty“(Adj.)
glut·ton (gl¾t“n) n. 1. A person who eats or consumes immoderate amounts of food and drink. [Middle English glotoun, from Old French gloton, from Latin glutt½, glutt½n-.] (Gulo gulo), having a heavyset body
Let’s look again at the scriptures from matthew:

Mat 11:19
The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners.
According to this scripture the human Jesus was well known to everyone:
·       To be a GLUTTON: Translation he was on the overweight side!
·       To be a WINEBIBBER: Translation He drank a whole lot!
·       Was a friend of PUBLICANS & SINNERS: and Jesus wasn’t necessarily there to correct people of their sins!
Remember people don’t like change, and you cannot be a friend to the world and serve God too!
Every true man of God when they are converted teaches the total truth of God and people will hate you for it! Jesus was a friend of these people according to scriptures.
As Hebrews chapter 5 says: Jesus suffered at the hands of God for his sins. Only after Jesus’ conversion Jesus finally began teaching truth to the people.
The Publicans and sinners would then turn on him and despise and reject him! So as you can see, the true Jesus was a normal man guilty of sins just like all prophets and just like you and I! Enough said.
Let’s move on…

Why does the New Testament not tell us about Jesus childhood, and teenage years?
So, surely these alleged “INSPIRED” men who wrote the gospels had some information about Jesus’ early life right? Come on? I mean, NONE of them were there at this alleged VIRGIN birth, yet these ghost writers expect us to BLINDLY believe that they can tell us “word-for-word” the dialogue allegedly between Mary and the Angel and exactly what events took place, but  yet from ages 12 to 30 nothing but silence?
Well I believe it’s because in order for the Greco-Roman Church to prove Jesus is an alleged God/Trinity member, the sins of Jesus as a child would damage their theologies’ credibility. So since they have all the power, then just simply omit it. No harm no foul! What sins in Jerusalem stays buried in Jerusalem huh?”
The sad part is, there are many Apocrypha books written in the Hebrew language that tells the story of Jesus’ early years, such as the “Infancy of Jesus” and the “Book of Mary.”
However if you do not have access to these books, I mentioned a book above that includes the early years of Jesus in great detail. Along with other omitted and theology damaging stories, this book includes passages where Jesus as a child became so angry at His mother for ignoring his gift, that he set her sheets on fire, thereby causing her to be badly burned in the fire. Check out the book: Jesus: The Rise of the Nazarene! This book is available at all book sites.
Hear is the Amazon.com link to it.
Now, if Jesus was 100% man, he had to be 100% child,  youth and teenager too right? So here are a few questions that all of us want to know but are afraid to ask for fear of being called a heretic or unsaved:
    • So did Jesus know what it is like to receive discipline?
    •  Did Mary or Joseph ever offer Correction to him? Or was Jesus the perfect little boy who never got in any trouble and minded his manners?
    •  Did he tell the truth when James or Jude his brother broke something or did things they weren’t supposed to do or did sinless Jesus live by the adage:W.W.J.D. What would JESUS do and go to his Parents and squeal on his brothers and tell of their mischievous ways?
    • When Joseph and Mary were about to discipline their other children, did the alleged 100% God boy, step in and intercede on behalf of his other brothers and sisters?
    •  Did Jesus order Joseph and Mary to stand down and forbade them from punishing their other children because he had already “FORGAVE” the other kids thereby undermining their parent’s authority?
    •   If we are to believe that Jesus was the perfect sinless son, how do you think it made his other brothers and sisters feel? Any resentment?
 Of course they would have resentment and jealousy and so would you! I mean what kid would want to be the “Jan Brady” to Jesus’ “Marsha Brady?”  Wow, can’t you just imagine the scene, James would play some childhood game and make an error and then perfect little Jesus would then score and become the hero, I can just hear James screaming,
“Marsha! Marsha! Marsha! or Jesus! Jesus! Jesus! LOL!
Now anyone with common sense knows that children will always be:

disrespectfuldisobedient, and rebellious!
Jesus was no exception to this rule! Like we said, most of the stories about Jesus’ early life are banned from the bible. However, one story was included that we all know of. So let’s begin there…

Now we all have heard the story of how when Jesus was twelve, Joseph his father, took Him and his mother Mary to Jerusalem to observe the feast of Passover.Coming back, Joseph and Mary join the caravan and believe Jesus is with them too. But in fact, Jesus, slips away from the group and stays behind in Jerusalem.

After a full day’s journey, Joseph and Mary search for Jesus in the caravan, and not finding Him, they return to Jerusalem. Three days and three nights elapse before the parents discover Jesus in the temple, engaged in a dialogue with the priests.If you have ever lost one of your kids – even for a fraction of a minute – you might have some idea of the terror Mary and Joseph endured over those nerve racking three days and three nights! I mean a 12 year old child in the heart of a corrupt city such as Jerusalem? It’s a wonder how she was able to keep it together without going into panic mode! I know I would have!

Now you guys know there will always be the few that still will have a slave master supporting: “Stockholm Syndrome” and will still want to believe the lies of the Grecian and Roman scribes. They will ridiculously say:

“Mary and Joseph were not really worried about Jesus because they already knew that Jesus was God even at the age of 12?
Yes I know, stop shaking your heads at them. They perish for a lack of knowledge and common sense. Apparently these people do not read the scriptures for truthful understanding do they? For if Joseph and Mary weren’t really worried, why in the heck would Mary open her mouth to say to Jesus:
Son(Jesus), why have you done this to us? Your father (Joseph) and I (Mary) have been looking for you with great anxiety,” Luke 2:48 NKJV
So as you can see, Joseph saw this as a great offense! Just like other normal parents, Jesus’ mother and father were in great anguish over the disappearance of their missing son.
Now, how does this prove that Jesus sinned?
Let’s assume Jesus is God, as the theologians claim.
This would mean that deity/Divine Jesus certainly would not cause this great offense because that would mean he would be the author of confusion, right?
Surely, if this alleged 100% God-boy actually had to stay in Jerusalem, he would have had the common courtesy to inform his parents of his Godly duties instead of having them go through such agony and torment for three whole days and three whole nights searching the dangerous streets of Jerusalem, right?
But does Jesus do the appropriate thing? Does Jesus do the courteous thing? Does Jesus do the GODLY thing? Heck no! Not only does this rebellious child decide he is grown enough to go off on his own, he decides to “SASS” his mother and disrespects her by talking back to her!
 Luke 02:49
And He said to them, “Why did you seek me? Did you not know that I must be about My Father’s business?
Oh no he didn’t! What does he mean why did they seek him? As if he was a grown man or something? Then either Jesus or Luke the Pagan, tries to justify his disobedience by claiming that Joseph and Mary should have known that he was doing God’s business? Baloney!
Now we all know that story is bogus because Jesus’ ministry did NOT begin until after he was“SANCTIFIED/CLEANSED” after his baptism, and eventually chosen/begotten by God !
Now the interesting thing about Jesus’ bogus story is that just one chapter later, the very same writer, Luke, clearly contradicts Jesus and tells us that Jesus did not start his ministry for another 18 years!! Wow!
Luke 3:23:
Now Jesus himself was about THIRTY YEARS OLD when he BEGAN his MINISTRY.”
Don’t you just love it when God allows the BIBLE to contradict blatant lies?
So clearly, Jesus wasn’t doing his “Father’s business!” This was a lie! Clearly Jesus wanted to do his own thing just as most disobedient and rebellious pre-teenagers have done since the beginning of time. This my friends makes Jesus guilty of breaking one of the TEN COMMANDMENTS which says:
EXODUS 20:12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
Clearly Jesus was inconsiderate and did not have any thoughts about what how his parents would be in great fear and terror for him! Jesus didn’t care! He saw his opportunity to go on safari in the big city and wasn’t going to allow his parents to stop him!
So what happened after Jesus’ father and mother weren’t gullible enough to  fall for this tall tale foolishness of Jesus? Let’s see:
Luke 02:51
“Then He (Jesus) went down with them and came to Nazareth, and was subject to them!
UH OH! Somebody is in trouble, trouble!
Clearly, someone is is about to find out if their father obeys the Proverbs scripture on Godly discipline which says:
“Whoever spares the “ROD (BELT)” hates their children but the one who loves their children is careful to discipline (SPANK) THEM!”
Wow! So tell me? After spending 3 days and 3 nights searching the big city in the midst of brothels, pubs, orphanages, gamblers, thieves, beggars, homosexuals and pedophiles, which emotion do you think Joseph and Mary have for their son?
Do you think they had “HATE” for him, i.e. the sparing of the rod or the LOVE, for him? I.e. they are careful to make sure this young boy, learns a valuable life lesson about disobedience and disrespect?,
Do you believe Joseph chose the careful and painful option of disciplining Jesus?
Those of us who had good parents, already KNOW which option a Godly man and a strong FATHER chose once the family returned home to Nazareth don’t we!
I just wonder if Jesus had to sit on one butt cheek for a while just like I had too when my Grandfather once tanned my back side? LOL!
Now, once again, you read the scriptures on your own!
I am so glad that you had your bibles out so that I didn’t have to do anything but basic commentary as you read along with me.
Does this change your opinion of Jesus because he sinned as all others do? Well it should not! Jesus never lied to us and claimed he was without sin, the Roman Church invented this lie and taught this falsehood to us. As you can see, Jesus openly admitted that God had to sanctify him and cleanse him of his sins. Being 100% human only, Jesus naturally knew the difficulties we all face in this walk of life.
For 33 years, Jesus faced the same sin issues like us. Also like us, he conquered some, and he failed some.
But the great thing about this is that GOD(YHWH) looks past our infirmities and can take a sinner like Jesus, David, Moses etc., sanctify him, cleanse him of his sins, and then say:
“Thou, art my son, Today, or on THIS VERY DAY, have I begotten/chosen thee!
This is the true nature of the sons of God, the Disciples also confirmed this fact and said:
1st John 3
01: “Behold, what manner of LOVE the FATHER (GOD) hath bestowed upon us (Disciples) that we should be called the SONS of God.Beloved, now are we the SONS of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he (GOD) shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 3 And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth(SANCTIFIES) himself, even as he is pure.
Wow! This verse says it all doesn’t it?
God reveals to us that Jesus, became a son/prophet of God after the sin sanctification process.
In spite of the false theology of Roman-ized Christianity, The bible also shows us that the Levites, Priests and the Disciples, just like Jesus, were also known as the:  
sons of God by the exact same sin sanctification process.
Never again, allow man-made theology or exegesis, brainwash you, clouding your God-given common sense!
Finally, there are other sins of Jesus in the bible too, but I think this note is long enough and insightful enough that anyone with an open-mind can now weed through the blatant lies of Roman and Greece. Don’t forget your bibles so that you can see past the mythology foolishness from hence forth and forever.
May God bless you, for reading this and doing your due diligence for seeking Godly clarity over theology. Peace….

Identifying the ONLY True God

The Only True God: The Father Alone

On the night he was betrayed, Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish man born out of a woman,born under the Law, kneeled down to pray to his God, the God of Israel, saying these words,

Father…. that they may know You the ONLY True God and Jesus Christ whom You sent” (John 17:3).

Jesus’ God was Yahweh, the God of Israel. He was a Jew who was obligated to observe the Law and the Shema,”Yahweh our God, Yahweh is one.” He believed the Shema meant”there was no other but He/Him” (Mark 12:28-34).

His God, His Yahweh,was his Father and his Father alone. Jesus’ God was a one person being:his Father only. Jesus’ God was NOT a Trinity and he did not have, and does not have, a different God than everyone else.

All that Jesus ever did was in the name of his Father who he called “the only God” (John 5:43-44).

When Jesus was about to die on the cross he cried to his God, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken me?” (Matthew 27:46).

And he promised them, “He who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God. Never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem which comes down from my God out of heaven, and my own new name.” (Revelation 3:12).

His God was the Father. Indeed, the Father is the Lord’s God, the God of our Lord, “the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ” (Romans 15:6, 2 Corinthians 1:3; 11:31; Ephesians 1:3;Colossians 1:3; 1 Peter 1:3),

the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory” (Ephesians 1:17).

And his God is ALSO our God as Jesus himself said, “I ascend to my Father and your Fatherand my God and your God” (John 20:17).

His God was his Father alone and he teaches us that our God is the same as his God, the Father alone. The Head of every man is Christ and the Head of Christ is God. (1 Corinthians 11:3).

For those who have been born again in him, Jesus’ God and Father is our God and Father.

And Paul identified the one God as the Father when he said, “There is no other God but one….for us there is one God, the Father, out of whom are all things and we to him, and one Lord Jesus Christ through whom are all things and we through him” (1 Corinthians 8:6).

Our one God is the Father and the Father alone. Our one Lord is Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ alone. Jesus’ one Lord is his God, the Father alone. The one Head of every man is Christ and the one Head of Christ is God. The one Lord of every man is Christ and the one Lord of Christ is God. We have one Lord: Jesus. Jesus’ has one Lord: God. We have one God: the Father. Jesus has one God: the Father. And again, Paul said,”there is… one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all who is above all and through all and in all. Yes the Father is above all and as Jesus said, “the Father is greater than I” (John 14:28)

and “the Father is greater than all” (John 10:29).

There is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Jesus Christ” (1 Timothy 2:5).

Jesus came to reveal the true God to us, the only true God and eternal life, and we are in Him who is True, the Father, in His Son Jesus Christ” (1 John 5:20).

Having made us kings and priests to his God and Father (Rev 1:6),

kings and priests to our God and Father (Rev 5:10),

we are to turn from idols to the Living and True God and wait for His Son who delivers us from the coming wrath.(1 Thesslonians 1:9-10)

at an hour only God his Father knows (Matthew 24:36).

We ought then to turn from idols made my men such as a three person God never mentioned in the Scriptures, a God Jesus never knew or served, and turn to the God of our Lord Jesus, the God he came to reveal to us, his Father alone, his Father and our Father, his God and our God.

Jesus’God and Father was also the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Acts 3:13).

God the Father is the God who called Israel out of Egypt (Hosea 11:1)

and called His son out of Egypt (Matthew 2:15).

God and Father was the God of the Prophets. Through the mouth of Moses, God the Father had promised to raise up a prophet and He raised up His son Jesus and sent him first to Israel to turn them from their wicked ways (Acts 3:22-26; Deut 18:15-18).

And so we also see it was God the Father who gave the Law to Israel when He spoke to them out of the fire (Deut 18:15; Exodus 20:1-19).

And it was God the Father who spoke out of the fire and of whom Moses said, and Jesus affirmed, “there is no other but He” (Deut 4:34-39; Mark 12:32),

Yahweh, the God of the Shema, the God who delivered Israel out of Egypt (Deut 6:1-5).

And so when he was tempted by Satan to disobey the God of Israel, his God, Jesus responded by saying he would worship and serve only the God of Israel, his God, (Matt 6:10; Deut 6:4-13)

Have we not all ONE Father? hath not ONE God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers? (Malachi 2:10 )

But the LORD is the True God, he is the living God, and an everlasting king: at his wrath the earth shall tremble, and the nations shall not be able to abide his indignation. Thus shall ye say unto them, The gods that have not made the heavens and the earth, even they shall perish from the earth, and from under these heavens.  ( Jeremiah 10:10-11 )

But now, O LORD, thou art our Father; we are the clay, and thou our potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.  ( Isaiah 64:8 )
Doubtless thou art our Father, though Abraham be ignorant of us, and Israel acknowledge us not: thou, O LORD, art our father, our redeemer; thy name is from everlasting. ( Isaiah 63:16 )

Did The Law Of YHWH – The Torah Ended With Christ?


Did The Law Of YHWH – The Torah Ended With Christ?

Aim of this note is to find out on how valid Paul’s claim regarding the Torah ( Law ) being no longer applicable.

Paul a Self-Made Apostle and who never met Jesus preached that Jesus was the End Of The Law, and Abolished the Law of God?

Now, How true that Jesus  was the END OF THE LAW?

For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth. [ Romans 10:4 KJV ]

And, How true that Jesus  ABOLISHED THE LAW?

by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, [Ephesians 2:15 ESV]

We too often hear from Paulinian Christians that salvation according to them is just simply  accept Jesus as your savior and have faith in Jesus and FORGET that STINKY, CURSED LAW of GOD!!! Sounds madness, insanity isn’t it?

Now where did these Paulinian Christians got this novel idea?

It was Paul who originally preached that obedience to Law Of God is no longer necessary. We read Paul saying;

But now we are delivered from the law, [Romans 7:6]

Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, [ Gal 2:16]

For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse [Gal 3:10]

In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old.Now that whichdecayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.[Heb 8:13]

Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us,and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;[Colossians 2:14 KJV]

Surprisingly, What the Muslims use to prove that Law of Moses was still in effect and binding was also the very teaching used by Paulinian to assert that Law is no longer binding.

Lets quote the very verses in question:

For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one title shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be “fulfilled.“[Matthew 5:18 KJV]

Christians argued that since the law according to them was already“fulfilled” oraccomplished thus in effects its no longer enforceable and binding! How tenacious and credible is Paulinian interpretation?
There 3 ways actually to debunk this unfounded claims by the Christians;

 FIRST : Show lexically that”fulfilled” is not the appropriate word used when rendering the passage

SECOND : Show contextually that the intended meaning of the passage was to KEEP the Law Of Moses !

THIRD : Show some verses which correlate with what Jesus said.

Moving on…. Let us start with the

FIRST : Show lexically that“fulfilled” is not the appropriate word used when rendering the passage

The Greek word translated as “fulfilled” in  Matt 5:17 was  #4137 πληρόω “pleroo” {play-ro’-o}}
Looking at the lexicons, Greek “pleroo” has also a lot of possible meaning. Among those acceptable meaning are

“to perform”, “execute”, and “to fully preach”

Online source :  http://lexiconcordance.com/greek/4137.html

Here is the verse in question : Matthew 5:17

Online source : http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Mat&c=5&t=KJV#s=t_conc_934017

Now here and observed carefully The Old tricks they used – the usual dishonest translation :

Amazingly , The same Greek word“pleero”  was also used in  Romans 15:19… but this time it was correctly translated as “preached”!!!!

Through mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God; so that from Jerusalem, and round about unto Illyricum, I have fully preached {pleroo} the gospel of Christ. [Romans 15:19 KJV]

Online source  : http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Rom&c=15&t=KJV#s=t_conc_1061019

The context of the preceding verses( v12-v16) dictates that the disciples who were also deemed as “light” or guide  are duty bound to guide the mankind by following a certain set of rules or code ofethics and morality. This is the same true with what is intended meaning of  “pleero” in Romans 15:19. Guiding, instructing, and exemplifying the moral code, theological guidance that they carry.
However, inspite of same intended purpose, Paulinian Christians in order to uphold Paul’s doctrine, did not  use the accurate rendering of Greek “pleero” in Matthew 5:17. They dishonestly translated the Greek “pleero” as fulfilled.  But, in Romans 15:19 they accurately rendered it as “preached”.!!!!

Therefore, keeping in mind of the lexicons and the manner it was used in Romans 15:19,
Matthew 5:17-19 can also be therefore read as

Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to”pleero” {fully preached, perform, or execute }


Moving on to the SECOND : Show contextually that the intended meaning of the passage was to KEEP the Law Of Moses !

Lets us cite the whole context to understand  what “pleero” in Mat 5:17 actually meant.

Matthew 5:12-21 KJV
12  Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.


{  Jesus been encouraging here his  little flocks that Men of God, The Prophets and their successors in the past  were always  been persecuted for delivering the message of God to humanity. Thus to be persecuted and to suffer – a thing not to be mourned over, but as among the chief blessings of life. That is, the reward will be great in the future world.To those who suffer most, God imparts the highest rewards. Hence, the crown of martyrdom has been thought to be the brightest that any of the redeemed shall wear; and hence many of the early Muslims sought to become martyrs, and threw themselves in the way of their persecutors, that they might be put to death.  I am just wondring how this”rejoicing” can come along with “Jesus” seems reluctant to die on his prayer on garden of Gethsemane, and his last cry “My God My God why have you forsaken me?  }
13  Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.
{ Salt renders food pleasant and palatable, and preserves from putrefaction. So Muslims, by their lives and instructions, are to keep the world from entire moral corruption. By bringing down the blessing of God in answer to their prayers, and by their influence and example, they save the world from universal vice and crime}

14  Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.

{ The light of the world often denotes the sun, Joh_11:9. The sun renders objects visible, shows their form, their nature, their beauties, their deformities. The term light is often applied to religious teachers. See Mat_4:16; Luk_2:32; Joh_1:4; Joh_8:12;Isa_49:6. It is pre-eminently applied to Jesus in these places, because he is,in the moral world, what the sun is in the natural world. The Prophets and their successors, disciples, are lights of the world, because they, by their instructions and example, show what God requires, what is the condition of man,what is the way of duty, peace, and happiness the way that leads to heaven.}
15  Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.
{  Neither do men light a candle … -The word rendered “candle” means any portable light, as a lamp, candle,lantern. Compare Mar_4:21; Luk_8:16; Luk_12:35. Jesus proceeded here to show them that the very reason why they were enlightened/guided was that others might also see the light, and be benefited by it. When people light a candle,they do not conceal the light, but place it where it may be of use. So it is with religion. It is given that we may benefit others. It is not to be concealed, but suffered to show itself, and to shed light on a surrounding wicked world. }
16  Let your light so shine before men,that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

{ Let your light so shine … – Let your holy life, your pure conversation, and your faithful instructions, be everywhere seen and known. Always, in all societies, in all business, at home and abroad, in prosperity and adversity, let it be seen that you are real Servant Of God. ..That they may see your good works – The proper motive to influence us is not simply that we may be seen (compare Mat_6:1), but it should be that our One and Only Lord may be glorified.}

Can there be anything more clearer than that? It is so clear v12-v16 Jesus was exhorting them of their obligations, responsibilities in the matter of guiding humanity through proper conduct and right wisdom. Now here we comes for the  MISUNDERSTOOD verse :::
17  Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil / preach.

{  I guessed by now you  already have the idea of what Jesus had in mind when he said… “THINK NOT that I CAME TO DESTROY!!{Destroy what?}  THE LAW!  Now why would Jesus exhorted his disciples in v12-16 to be a light as a guide for the humanity if these disciple will not live with in a defined moral code, moral laws, ethics which is prescribed by God if it will end or fulfilled as what the Paulinian alleged? What standards or prescribed ways of living if we don’t have such a standards/Laws that would guide us in all our endeavors? Wouldn’t it become chaotic? That everyone will do whatever he please because there is no Law regulating his conducts? Certainly it would be. God can not allow us to live without a Laws prescribed by Him. Therefore, it is not logical that Jesus who knows his Father’s Will advocated that the Law ended or fulfilled by him! Matthew 5:17 therefore should have been correctly read as THINK NOT that I COME TO DESTROY/ABOLISHED the Law, BUT to FULLY PREACH and EXECUTE it { pleero }!!
18  For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

{ When will the heaven pass? The expression “Till heaven and earth pass” simply meansFOREVER!!  Jesus never put an “end” nor destroy The Law. }
19  Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
{ Why would Jesus warns “Whosoever therefore shall break one of these” if after all these Laws will be sooner to be ended by him??? The warning will make sense only if  the Laws will be continuously binding!}

20  For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

{  Why would Jesus criticized the man-made oral traditions of the Pharisees if the Law of Moses too will be made into nothing because he will put an end to it? It makes no sense of course unless The Law of Moses is still binding }
21  Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:

{ Why would Jesus mentioned here the Law of Moses if it be will ended as what the Christians alleged? It makes no sense unless of course if it will be still binding }

Finally, the sermon of Jesus in this chapter culminated in :

48 :Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

{ God is perfect!Our final goal is to be with Him who is Perfect and Holy!  Jesus is telling that it is ONLY through following the Law of God which led us into perfection!!!  Please compare this withPeople who reject Law Of Moses on Matthew 7:23 and 1 Cor 9:21  }
Moving on to the THIRD :  Show some verses which correlate with what Jesus said.

Except for Paul who considered The Law Of God as a CURSE,  Genuine Prophets and their Apostles unconditionally LOVE the Laws of God!!!

TORAH The Word Of God is Eternal

Psalm119:160 New International Version   http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalms+119%3A160&version=NIV

” All your words are true; all your righteous laws are eternal..”

Psalm 19:7
The law of the LORD is perfect, refreshing the soul. The statutes of the LORD are trustworthy, making wise the simple.

Psalm 111:8
They are established for ever and ever, enacted in faithfulness and uprightness.

Psalm 119:89
Your word, LORD, is eternal; it stands firm in the heavens.

Psalm 119:142
Your righteousness is everlasting and your law is true.

Psalm 119:152
Long ago I learned from your statutes that you established them to last forever.

Psalm 119:164
Seven times a day I praise you for your righteous laws.

Psalm 139:17
How precious to me are your thoughts, God! How vast is the sum of them!

Online Source : http://biblehub.com/psalms/119-160.htm

The BIG Questions that every Paulinian should answer is : Who are they TO ABOLISHEDthe Law when God clearly stated that The Law – The Torah is ETERNAL?

ABRAHAM Loves the Laws of God

Genesis 26:5 KJV

Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.

MOSES Loves the Laws of God


It is the LORD your God you must follow, and him you must revere. Keep his commands and obey him; serve him and hold fast to him.


However, if you do not obey the LORD your God and do not carefully follow all his commands and decrees I am giving you today, all these curses will come on you and overtake you:


The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law.


if you obey the LORD your God and keep his commands and decrees that are written in this Book of the Law and turn to the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.

David  Loves The Law of God

Psalms 19:7-11 KJV

7  The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple.

8  The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes.

9  The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring forever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether.

10  More to be desired are they than gold, yea,than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb.

11  Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward.

St John – One of The Genuine Disciples of Jesus : Loves The Law Of God
1 John 5:2-3 KJV

2  By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments.

3  For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.

St James – The Just, One of the genuine  Apostles of Jesus : Loves The Law Of God

But whoso looketh into the “PERFECT LAW” of LIBERTY and “CONTINUETH” therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the “WORK,” this man shall be blessed in his “DEED.” JAMES 1:25

I think this will SUFFICE to demonstrate my point that … Loving God is only through KEEPING his COMMANDMENTS and applying the Eternal Laws throughout his lives!

Conclusion : Only Satan HATES the Law of God !

Can you people believe on what you have read? Yes! This Insane Pharisees – Saul/Paul of Tarsus deemed the Eternal Law of God as a CURSED!!!! Now who hate most and love to violate the Laws of God? Satan of Course! But Paul of Tarsus is more evil, treacherous than Satan, Paul even ABOLISHED the Whole Law Of God and proclaim himself ABOVE the Law of God!!!

Paul does what he wants when he wants to do it. God’s wrath doesn’t matter to him because he is ABOVE THE LAW! Consider these verses of Paul:


All things are lawful unto me … all things are lawful for me but I will not be brought under the power of “ANY!” 1ST CORINTHIANS 6:12

Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. ROMANS 14: 5

Paul twists the truth and says:

“If you think it is sin then it is sin, but if you think it is good then, “IT IS GOOD!”As long as you believe a thing to be truth, it is truth! So says Paul.

Paul then says:

  • For whether we “LIVE” we live unto the Lord; and whether we “DIE,” we die unto the Lord: whether we “LIVE” therefore, or “DIE,” we are the Lord’s. ROMANS 14: 8

Paul / Satan says:

Forget about the Law because it doesn’t matter what you do! You are going to Heaven whether you follow Him or not because God loves you too much to kill you right?”

Lastly Paul finishes his lies with a ridiculous statement:

  • Happy is he that condemns not himself in that thing which he allows. ROMANS 14: 22

If you don’t think about your sins then you won’t feel bad about them. Again this man’s thinking is warped. Neither he nor anyone that follows his new philosophy can do any wrong!

“Hurry, Hurry folks! Step right up and get your “Get out of Hell free” gospel that allows you to sin and still go to Heaven all expenses paid!”


Christian Scholar says : Jesus is NOT A LITERAL SON OF GOD!

Christian Scholar says : Jesus is NOT A LITERAL SON OF GOD!

zoomed image

Contrary to what I am hearing from some ignorant Christians pastor, bible-thumper, hot-gospeller, charlattan almost always ignorantly claimed that Jesus is God because he is the Son of God! But I was surprised when I stumble into the Christians website :


where while attempting to described how Jesus look like in the light of islamic literatures he says that


  1. Christian theology has never taught that Jesus was literally the offspring of God the Father.  Neither has Christianity ever taught that God has a wife.  (The cult ofMormonism has stated such erring doctrines, but it is not considered Christian.)  The term Son of God signified Jesus’ special and unique relationship with the Father as the Father’s representative (Heb. 1:1-3)…”I copied what they wrote below.


Interesting Quotes from the Hadith on Jesus

by Matt Slick

  1. Muhammad said Jesus was of red complexion.
    1. The Prophet said, “I saw Moses, Jesus and Abraham (on the night of my Ascension to the heavens). Jesus was of red complexion, curly hair and a broad chest. Moses was of brown complexion, straight hair and tall stature as if he was from the people of Az-Zutt.”  Volume 4, Book 55, Number 648, Narrated Ibn Umar.
  2. Muhammad said Jesus said he can’t intercede for people.
    1. The Prophet said, “Allah will gather the believers on the Day of Resurrection in the same way (as they are gathered in this life), and they will say, ‘Let us ask someone to intercede for us with our Lord that He may relieve us from this place of ours.’ …They will go to Abraham who will reply, ‘I am not fit for this undertaking,’ and mention to them the mistakes he made, and add, ‘But you’d better go to Moses, a slave whom Allah gave the Torah and to whom He spoke directly’ They will go to Moses who will reply, ‘I am not fit for this undertaking,’ and mention to them the mistakes he made, and add, ‘You’d better go to Jesus, Allah’s slave and His Apostle and His Word (Be: And it was) and a soul created by Him.’ They will go to Jesus who will say, ‘I am not fit for this undertaking, but you’d better go to Muhammad whose sins of the past and the future had been forgiven (by Allah).’ So they will come to me and I will ask the permission of my Lord, and I will be permitted (to present myself) before Him.” Volume 9, Book 93, Number 507. Narrated Anas. Also, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 236.
      1. This is contrary to the Bible which states that Jesus is our mediator (1 Tim. 2:5) and always lives to intercede for us:  Heb. 7:25, says, “Hence, also, He is able to save forever those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them.
  3. Muhammad implies that the Christian doctrine of Jesus as the son of God means God had a wife, demonstrating his lack of understanding of the issue.
    1. On the Day of Resurrection, a call-maker will announce, “Let every nation follow that which they used to worship.” Then none of those who used to worship anything other than Allah like idols and other deities but will fall in Hell (Fire), till there will remain none but those who used to worship Allah, both those who were obedient (i.e. good) and those who were disobedient (i.e. bad) and the remaining party of the people of the Scripture. . . Afterwards the Christians will be called upon and it will be said to them, ‘Who do you use to worship?’ They will say, ‘We used to worship Jesus, the son of Allah.’ It will be said to them, ‘You are liars, for Allah has never taken anyone as a wife or a son,’ . . .  Allah will say, ‘I am your Lord.’ They will say twice or thrice, ‘We do not worship any besides Allah.’ ”  Volume 6, Book 60, Number 105.Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri,
      1. Christian theology has never taught that Jesus was literally the offspring of God the Father.  Neither has Christianity ever taught that God has a wife.  (The cult ofMormonism has stated such erring doctrines, but it is not considered Christian.)  The term Son of God signified Jesus’ special and unique relationship with the Father as the Father’s representative (Heb. 1:1-3).
  4. Muhammad said that Jesus worshiped Allah.
    1. Regarding the explanation of the Verse: ‘Those whom they call upon (worship) (like Jesus the Son of Mary, angels etc.) desire (for themselves) means of access to their Lord (Allah) as to which of them should be the nearer and they hope for His Mercy and fear His torment.’ (17.57)They themselves (e.g. Angels, saints, Apostles, Jesus, etc.,) worshipped Allah, Those Jinns who were worshipped by some Arabs became Muslims (embraced Islam), but those human beings stuck to their (old) religion. Al-Amash said extra: ‘Say, (O Muhammad): Call unto those besides Him whom you assume (to be gods).’ (17.56)   Volume 6, Book 60, Number 238. Narrated Abdullah.
      1. Such a statement is only a conjecture.  Jesus worshiped YHWH (Yahweh).  See John 17.
  5. Ibn ‘Umar says that to say “Jesus is Lord,” is a great sin.
    1. Whenever Ibn ‘Umar was asked about marrying a Christian lady or a Jewess, he would say: “Allah has made it unlawful for the believers to marry ladies who ascribe partners in worship to Allah, and I do not know of a greater thing, as regards to ascribing partners in worship, etc. to Allah, than that a lady should say that Jesus is her Lord although he is just one of Allah’s slaves.” Volume 7, Book 63, Number 209.  Narrated Nafi’.
      1. It is not a great sin and it is taught in the Bible that such a confession is necessary, a sign of salvation (Rom. 10:9-10).
  6. Muhammad said Jesus spoke while in the cradle
    1. The Prophet said, “None spoke in cradle but three: (The first was) Jesus, (the second was), there a man from Bani Israel called Juraij. Volume 4, Book 55, Number 645,  Narrated Abu Huraira.

The preceding Hadith are transmitted by Sahih Bukhari and are quoted from and online source found at http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/.

Source : http://carm.org/religious-movements/islam/interesting-quotes-hadith-jesus

NB About the writer :

Matt Slick

Matt SlickMatt SlickPresident and Founder of the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry. Matt earned his Bachelors in Social Science from Concordia University, Irvine, CA in 1988. He earned his Masters of Divinity from Westminster Theological Seminary, in Escondido, CA, in 1991. He now resides in the Boise, Idaho area with his family. He is ordained. Matt started CARM in October of 1995 to respond to the many false teachings of the cults on the Internet.



For more info on the Judaic expression “son of god”  please read more here :


“Son of God” means “Servant of God” in Hebrew

Comparison between Hebrew and Arabic:

In this article, I will prove that the Bible’s “Son of GOD” translation is wrong, because it literally means “Servant of GOD” as Islam clearly defines it. I have shown ample evidence from Hebrew below.

The following definitions were taken from:http://www.thebabycorner.com/pregnancy/babynames/find.php?sex=boy&begin=a 

WordHebrew or ArabicEnglish TranslationAbbottHebrewFatherAbbArabicFatherAbelHebrewBreath or Son ofAbdArabicServant of or Slave of

Important Note: Since “Abd” means “Servant of” in Arabic, and “Abel” means “Breath of” in Hebrew, then this means “Abel” in Hebrew could also mean “Servant of” or “Creation of”, since it literally also means “Breath of”.

The following Hebrew words and their definitions were taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_God

WordHebrew or ArabicEnglish TranslationBenHebrewSon ofBinArabicSon of (as in Osama bin Laden)Benie ElohimHebrewSons of GODBeniArabicPeople of (as in Bani Israel, People of Israel)

Important Note: Since “Beni” in Arabic means “People of”, then this means that “Benie” in Hebrew also means “People of” or “Group of”, or “Belongings of”, which was falsely translated as “Sons of” throughout the entire Bible!

“In the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha

This literature contain a few passages in which the title “son of God” is given to the Messiah (see Enoch, cv. 2; IV Esdras vii. 28-29; xiii. 32, 37, 52; xiv. 9); but the title belongs also to any one whose piety has placed him in a filial relation to God (see Wisdom ii. 13, 16, 18; v. 5, where “the sons of God” are identical with “the saints”; comp. Ecclus. [Sirach] iv. 10). 

In Judaism, it is through such personal relations that the individual becomes conscious of God’s fatherhood, and gradually in Hellenistic and rabbinical literature “sonship to God” was ascribed first to every Israelite and then to every member of the human race (Abot iii. 15, v. 20; Ber. v. 1; see Abba). In one midrash, the Torah is said to be God’s “daughter” (Leviticus Rabbah xx.)”


Important Note: “filial relation to God” means that a person or creation has a special place in GOD Almighty’s Sight. Also, “sons of God” being identical with “the saints” means that the term “son of God” is not an accurate one in the sense of being physically or biologically “part of GOD” or “Son of GOD” respectively as the trinitarian Christians falsely claim.

Also, “In one midrash, the Torah is said to be God’s “daughter'”, further proves my point that “Son of GOD” today in the English bibles don’t mean more than a “Creation of GOD” or “Servant of GOD”; perhaps a very dear or special servant of GOD Almighty, as the Torah was also called “daughter of GOD”.

“Son of God” is the same as “Servant of God” in Hebrew!

In modern English usage, the Son of God is almost always a reference to Jesus Christ, whom Christianityholds to be the son of the Christian God, eternally begotten of God the Father and coeternal with God the Father and God the Holy Spirit

Human or part-human offspring of deities are very common in other religions and mythologies, however. For example in the Epic of Gilgamesh, one of the earliest recorded legends of humanity, Gilgamesh claimed to be of both human and divine descent. Another well-known son of a god and a human is Hercules

A great many pantheons also included genealogies in which various gods were descended from other gods, and so the term “son of god” may be applied to many actual deities as well.”


Important Note: So as we can see, the “Son of GOD” theory originally comes from pagan Greek origins. And since most of the Bible’s New Testament was written in Greek, then it had been without a doubt negatively influenced by such pagan theology, where Jesus being called “Son of GOD” is literally interpreted today as “part of GOD” or the “Creator of the Universe”.

In the Hebrew Bible Israel is both a man (Jacob, the son of Isaac) and the nation that descended from him. 

Because of the shared name and organic identity, God speaks to the nation as though he were a single person. Israel is, in fact, God’s son (Exod 4:22  beni vechori yisrael; Deut 14:1  banim atem l’Adonai; Jer 31:9  ki hayiti le’yisrael le’av; Hosea 11:1  mimitzrayim qarati livni). 

Israel’s Father nurtures him to grow up and become a worshiping servant (Exod 4:23 “Let my son go that he may serve me”).”


Important Note: Here we see when Israel became GOD Almighty’s “son”, he reached the point of being GOD Almighty’s “servant”. This means that “son of GOD” is nothing but a “Servant of GOD” as clearly defined in Islam. It doesn’t at all mean that the individual is part of GOD Almighty, or he is GOD the Father Himself.

This is further proven in this quote:

“The Inner Son Rescues His People
Read together, these texts make clear that the Plan (etzah) is set in God’s mind. He will use the anointed one and his circle of faithful-to-God disciples as his agent for bringing rebellious Israel back to his sonship calling. 

[font=verdana, geneva, helvetica, sans-serif][size=-1]YHVH formed me from the womb to be His Servant,
to bring Jacob back to him, 
in order that Israel might be gathered to Him. It is too small a thing that you should be 
my Servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, 
and to restore the preserved ones [netzurim] of Israel . . . (Isa 49:5, 6) [/size][/font]


It’s worth noting that the apostles Paul and Barnabas quoted this passage in reference to themselves, as being members of the Messiah’s Remnant Israel (Acts 13:46-48; cf. Luke 2:32). 

Thus, within the writings of Isaiah we observe the tensions, paradoxes, and hopes for fixing what is broken both within God’s servant people and in the creation as a whole. To accomplish this there are two whoserve the Lord, two with the title “Eved.” “


Important Note: Again, we see that the Son of GOD’s main responsibility is to Serve GOD Almighty and to Worship Him alone. So a Son of GOD is basically a Servant of GOD. Also, Jesus being called “Son of GOD” is also no different. Him being the “Son of GOD” means he is a Servant of GOD Almighty, or Abdallah, since “Abd” means “Servant of” and “Allah” means “GOD” or “The Supreme GOD Almighty above all gods”.

Easiest Way to Debunk Jesus divinity on John 8:58 ” I AM “

Christians claim that in John 8:58 Jesus is calling himself the “I AM” because the KJV, NIV and other translations render John 8:58 “before Abraham was, I AM”.

They make the connection to Exodus 3:14 which says in the KJV, NIV, Bible in Basic English, New English Bible “And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.”

They see the similar words in English translations so they make the connection! this is ridiculous! The problem with that is that Jesus did not speak English. So trinitarians claim that Jesus was quoting from the Septuagint which is a translation into Greek from the Hebrew. John 8:58 in Greek says “lego humin, prin Abraam genesthai ego eimi.” 

Let’s look into if Jesus could have quoted that to say that he was Jehovah.

Below is a picture of a triglot bible. In the left column is the Hebrew, middle column is the Greek Septuagint and the right column is the New International Version. Exodus 3:14 in the Septuagint reads “The God to Moses said, (Ego eimi ho on) I am the one [or the being].

This is what you are to say to the sons of Israel, (Ho On) The One [or the being] has sent me to you.” In the Greek “Ego Eimi (I am)” is not used as the name or title of God; it is used as a pronoun linking verb combination.

The term “Ho On (The One)” is used as the title for God as that is repeated in the Greek for the English “I AM”.

Thus Jesus could not have quoted from the Septuagint to identify himself with Jehovah as an I AM.

Then, What is the claim where Jesus says, “before Abraham came into being, I am” (John 8:58)?

Is the author of the Gospel of John claiming that Jesus is part of a tri-unity god when he has Jesus say, “before Abraham came into being, I am” (John 8:58)?

Answer: John 8:56-58 states: “‘Abraham your father rejoiced to see my day; and he saw it, and was glad.’ The Jews therefore said to him: ‘You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?’ Jesus said to them: ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham came into being, I am.’”

Trinitarians argue that the Greek words ego eimi (“I am”), allegedly spoken by Jesus (John 8:58), indicate that Jesus is God (see also John 8:24, 28).

They arrive at their contention by connecting the phrase “I am” with the words spoken by God in Exodus 3:14 and often translated: “I AM THAT I AM . . . . Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: I AM has sent me to you.” However, the literal and proper translation of this verse is: I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE. . . . Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: I WILL BE has sent me to you.”  Since the author of the Gospel of John utilized the Greek Septuagint translation of the Bible in his writings, it cannot be assumed that John’s Jesus is referring to the words in Exodus 3:14. Although Jesus actually spoke in Hebrew or Aramaic, not Greek, John recorded Jesus’ alleged words in Greek. Ego eimi (“I am”), used by John’s Jesus, is not the same as ho on (“The Being, The One Who Is”), which is used in the Septuagint’s rendering of Exodus 3:14: “And God spoke to Moses, saying, I am THE BEING; and He said, Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: THE BEING has sent me to you.” Even though ho on appears in the Gospel of John, it is never used as a title or name or exclusively as a reference to Jesus. In the Book of Revelation, also credited to John by Christian commentators, ho on appears five times (Revelation 1:4, 8; 4:8; 11:17; 16:5). Significantly, in each instance, it is used as a title or designation applied to God, not Jesus. Thus: “John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace, from Him who is [ho on] and who was and who is to come; and from the seven spirits who are before His throne” (Revelation 1:4). That this verse refers to God and not Jesus is seen from the following verse, which continues the greeting by now including Jesus as one of those sending greetings. Hence, John says, in verses 4 and 5, that greetings are sent by God, the seven spirits, and Jesus.

In verse 8, John writes: “‘I am the Alpha and the Omega,’ says the Lord God, ‘who is [ho on] and who was and who is to come, the Almighty’” (Revelation 1:8). This verse also speaks of God, not Jesus. In Revelation 4:8, ho on is applied to “the Lord God, the Almighty,” not Jesus, who, as the “Lamb” referred to in Revelation 5:6-7, comes to God, who is sitting on His throne. That they are two separate entities is seen from Revelation 5:13: “To the one sitting on the throne, and to the Lamb, be blessing and honor and glory and dominion forever and ever.” In addition, ho on is applied to the “Lord God, the Almighty,” not Jesus, in Revelation 11:17 and Revelation 16:5. That ho on in Revelation 16:5 refers to God and not Jesus can be seen from verse 7, which, referring to the subject of verses 5 and 6, states: “And I heard the altar saying: ‘Yes, Lord God, the Almighty, true and righteous are Your judgments.’” These are further indications that ho on and ego eimi are not used as synonymous terms by John.

In John 8:56-58, John is expounding his belief that Jesus had a prehuman existence as an angelic being in heaven. John’s Jesus is proclaiming here that this prehuman existence began before Abraham was born: “Before Abraham came into being, I am.” The fact of the matter is that the text does not at all indicate how long Jesus supposedly lived before Abraham. In no honest way can John’s statement be taken to identify Jesus as God.