Did Peter endorse Paul?

Jesus’s Prophecy Concerning Peter

Did Peter endorse Paul?

Whenever Paul is called into question, Christians Paulinian in most cases would inevitably brings up Peter and what he said about Paul’s  letters that supposedly refers to them as Scripture. This is assuming that the book of 2 Peter is authentic. * (see footnote at end of chapter) I give the book the benefit of the doubt. The passage reads:

“…and account that the long suffering of our Lord is salvation as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to understand, which those who are untaught and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.” 2 Peter 3:15,16    NKJV

Before we get to the subject of Jesus’s prophecy to Peter, there are several things in this quote that should be pointed out. First, notice that there is only one issue clearly stated by Peter in which we know he is in agreement with Paul…  the patience in persecution issue. Second, the “things hard to understand” are not identified in this short passage, much less outlined as to which position is correct and which is the twisted version.*  Third, it is interesting to note that in spite of the fact that Peter has obviously read many of Paul’s epistles and is therefore fully aware of Paul claiming to be an apostle, Peter does not call him a fellow apostle, but instead calls him “brother“.  Fourth, claiming that Peter was endorsing Paul’s letters, as the Holy Word of God is a bit of a stretch. Though the Greek word for “Scripture” does in fact mean “Holy Writings”, and the Greek word for “rest” means “the rest of any number or class under consideration”. When Peter said, “as they do”, he wasn’t doing anything more than comparing similarities in the way some people deal with both Paul’s writings and the Holy Word of God.  If we are concerning ourselves with only this passage, just exactly what Peter thinks of Paul’s writings is somewhat up for grabs.*

* When this passage is quoted, it is seldom continued on to the next verse where Peter indicates which doctrine, in his view, is the “twisted” version;

“You therefore, beloved, since you know these things beforehand, beware lest you also fall from your own steadfastness, being led away with the error of the law-less**. 2 Peter 3:17
** Some translations read “wicked”. The Greek word literally means “lawless”.

It must be admitted though that Peter is in fact being considerate and speaking favorably of Paul.  And this is in spite of the fact that whenever Paul makes mention of Peter, Peter is never left in a positive light! Peter is obviously taking a stand against the law-less doctrine that many are deriving from Paul’s letters, but he continues to speak quite favorably of Paul. He apparently refuses to admit to himself or believe that Paul was in fact preaching that the Law had been superceded. In this, Peter would have been differing with James, or at best, attempting to smooth over the situation.

This brings us to a prophecy Jesus gave to Peter shortly before his ascension, the implications of which should cause us no surprise that Peter continues to be used to support Paul.

The Prophecy concerning Peter

In the last chapter of Johns’ gospel, Jesus made a prophecy concerning Peter, which has a definite connection to the subject at hand. Jesus said:

“Most assuredly, I say to you, when you were younger, you bound yourself and walked where you wished; but when you are old, you will stretch forth your hands, and another will bind you and take you where you do not wish.” John 21:18   NKJV

Question. If these few words concerning Peter’s future were all we had to go on, what could be determined from them?  It could not include more than two things.  One, Peter would be taken where he did not want to go.  And two, it was not a good sounding prophecy.  But wait!  The narrative comes to the rescue with the interpretation of this prophecy in the very next sentence.

“This he spoke, signifying by what death he would glorify God.” John 21:19

It first should be noted that these words of interpretation are not the words of Jesus, but are the commentary of the writer, John.  It can be deduced from the remaining context that this interpretation concerning Peter’s martyrdom was generally accepted by all.

Here is the question. How could the disciples possibly get the idea of “death” from Jesus’s words?  It may not have been a good sounding prophecy, but it certainly doesn’t give the picture of Peter dying. Tradition tells us that Peter was crucified up side down, but this is only a tradition.  Even if this were true, one can find even less of this picture in Jesus’s words.   Many translations read, “…you will stretch out your hands…”   This is a classic example of how accepted traditional interpretations can play a very large albeit damaging role in the translating process.  The Greek word translated “out” primarily means to stretch out in front toward something.  The King James Version translates this most correctly, “…thou shalt stretch forth thy hands...”.  This is hardly a picture of a crucifixion.  Also, the chronological order of the events listed in the prophecy would be backwards if this were a picture of a crucifixion. This is easy to see when one reads one of today’s popular paraphrased versions which reads,   “...when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will dress you and take you where you do not want to go.”  It is hard to imagine someone dressing Peter while he is on a cross and then taking him some place that he doesn’t want to go.  I’d figure he was there already!  If this were a picture of a crucifixion, Jesus would have put it in the proper chronological order as he did in the fist part of his statement when he said to Peter, “...when you were younger, you girded yourself and walked where you wished…“.   Notice how strange it would sound if Jesus had said,  “when you were younger you walked were you wished (naked), and then dressed yourself”.  If this were a picture of a crucifixion, Jesus would have said to Peter, ‘…when you are old, another will gird you and take you were you do not wish, and you will stretch out your hands.’

Correlation of Peter’s and John’s prophecy

Going back to the question; How did the disciples get the idea of Peter’s death from Jesus’s words? We have the answer in the next few verses.

“Then Peter, turning around saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following… Peter, seeing him, said to Jesus, “But Lord, what about this man?” Jesus said to him, “If I will that he remain till I come, what is that to you? You follow me”. Then this saying went out among the brethren that this disciple would not die.  John 21:20-23a

You see?  Peter and the rest of them who were still scratching their heads over what was said about Peter, were smart enough to know that how Jesus answered the question about John would help them understand what he had said about Peter.  Viola!  If John was going to live until Jesus returned, that must mean that Peter’s negative prophecy meant he was going to die!  It only stood to reason, and in fact it was pretty good logic. But it assumed that they clearly understood what Jesus was saying about John!  How Jesus had answered the question about John definitely had a close correlation to what he had said about Peter, but the problem is that the disciples didn’t understand the prophecy concerning John either!  This is obvious in light of the following text.  Stay with me on this.

Unraveling John’s prophecy

Let’s focus on John’s prophecy. Many scholars agree that verse 24 was added by someone other than John. It was most likely John’s disciples shortly before, or more likely shortly after,  John’s death. It reads:

“This is the disciple who testifies of these things, and wrote these things; and we know that his testimony is true.” John 21:24

The plural word “we” in this verse is very much out of place with the singular “I” of the very next verse. It reads:

“And there are also many other things that Jesus did, which if they were written one by one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.”    John 21:25

This last statement of John has a very familiar ring to it. It sounds strikingly similar the last two verses of the preceding chapter.

“And truly Jesus did many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name.”     John 20:30,31

In the entire script of the book of John, there are no other passages that sound like these two.  I believe that John had originally ended his record of the gospel at the end of chapter 20.  But then he decided that in light what could still be written, he would add to his record what we have come to know as chapter 21.  The reason I add this observation here is because it is important to note that John has set a precedent and shown us how he would tend to end his record. In chapter 20, he goes from a direct quote of Jesus in verse 29, to verse 30, and 31 as quoted above.  I believe that the end of his record in chapter 21 is no different.  This helps to understand what parts at the end of the 21st chapter are John’s and what parts were added later by others.

Getting back to the reason why John’s disciples added what they did. Apparently the death or prospect of John’s death was causing problems with the common interpretation of Jesus’s prophecy concerning him. Everyone thought John would not die.  And now they were being forced to admit that maybe John and the others who had heard the prophecy that day might have misunderstood Jesus.  No doubt they did not want John’s record to make Jesus look like a liar, and far be it from them to let the misunderstanding continue over what was probably no more than a case of missing one small word.  So to remedy the problem they settled on the understanding that Jesus must have said,   “If I will that he remain till I come…”

If in fact Jesus had said “If“, this would cause several problems for my thinking besides the fact that I think they completely misunderstood Jesus right from the start.

First, if indeed Jesus had clearly said,  “If I will that he remain“,  I find it hard to believe that any reasonable person would take this statement and run with it, claiming that Jesus had definitely said John would not die.  If the “If” were common knowledge, reasonable thinking people wouldn’t push the hypothetical question to a definite statement. Yet it says in verse 23.

“Then this saying went out among the brethren that this disciple (John) would not die.”

Secondly, the statement of Jesus as recorded with the “if” is grammatically incorrect!  If the statement of Jesus had started with the “if” as a hypothetical question, then the last half of the question should not have been stated as though it were following a definite statement.  In short, if Jesus had said  “If I will that he remain“,  he should have continued to follow it with the hypothetical question;  “what would that be to you?”  But he didn’t.  He said, “what is* that to you?”

* Note to those who know the word “is” is not found in the Greek text. In Greek, the definitive “is” may be, and regularly is assumed because the indefinite is always stated.

Here is what I believe happened.  Jesus’s statement concerning John was no less a prophecy, nor was it any less definite than was his prophecy concerning Peter which started with… “Most assuredly, I say to you…“.  I believe he said…

“I will that he (John) remain till I come! What is that to you?”

And everyone interpreted it just the way it sounded and subsequently used it to interpret what Jesus had said about Peter.  Everyone including Peter himself. Peter continued to believe this interpretation until he did die a martyrs death. He mentions this in 2Peter 1:14

“…knowing that shortly I must put off my tent, just as our Lord Jesus the Messiah showed me.”

But when John was obviously coming to the end of his life and his disciples began to realize they had missed it somewhere, they thought to themselves and reasoned just like you or I would.   I’m sure they thought to themselves…  “Jesus must have said ‘if’, and the ‘if’ just wasn’t heard. The focus of his statement must not have been on John as thought. He must have been simply telling Peter to mind his own business.”

Read the account again and see if this doesn’t sound like what happened.

22  Jesus said to him, “If I will that he remain till I come, what is that to you? You follow me.”  23 Then this saying went out among the brethren  that this disciple would not die. Yet Jesus did not say to him that he would not die, but, “If I will that he remain till I come, what is that to you?”  24 This is the disciple who testifies of these things, and wrote these things; and we know that his testimony is true.  25 And there are also many other things that Jesus did, which if they were written one by one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.

It appears that John’s disciples, in an attempt to try to remedy an apparent misunderstanding, added the “if” in verse 22, and all of verses 23 and 24 as highlighted.  John’s original ending of what we know as chapter 21 read like this;

Jesus said to him, “I will that he remain till I come! What is that to you? You follow me”. And there are also many other things that Jesus did, which if they were written one by one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.

Now read the last three verses of the previous chapter where John had originally ended, and notice how it is uncluttered with explanatory apologetics… and notice the similar flow.

Jesus said to him, “Thomas, because you have seen me, you have believed.” Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” And truly Jesus did many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name.

If it is true that Jesus did not say “if“, but said, “I will that he (John) remain till I come“,  we are left back at square one, admitting to the same difficulty in understanding that John’s disciples had. It doesn’t make sense. John died a long time ago!  What could Jesus have meant by, “I will that he remain till I come.”

I must digress even further from Peter’s prophecy a little more here, but please hang with me and watch it all come together.

 Past precedence for help

To help us understand what Jesus meant about John, let’s take a look at some other passages found in the Gospels where Jesus was completely misunderstood.  It seems to have happened on a fairly regular basis. When trying to understand what Jesus meant by what he said, the greatest tool available to help us understand is the context in which a statement is found. What was said in the same scene before and after a curious statement will give us the best clues as to its meaning.  We need to see that Jesus virtually always had an underlying theme threaded through his discourses.  As will be shown, this could not be more true in respect to Peter’s and John’s prophecies.

When a passage seems to jump out of its context with no apparent connection to what was said before or after, red flags should go up.  This is especially true in this first example found in both Matthew 24:34,35 and Luke 21: 32,33. After Jesus had prophesied concerning what was going to happen on earth just before he returned, he said:

“Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things are fulfilled.”

The most common interpretation of this passage suggests that those in the future who are alive at the time the prophecies begin to come true would live to see all of them fulfilled.  But Jesus had clearly said, “this generation“,  and not that generation.  Everyone who heard him that day heard him say that they would not pass away.  They knew he was talking about them. It is only now, many hundreds of years after that generation has passed away that we feel forced to accept the current prevailing interpretation.

Any person with an interest in the events that must transpire at the close of this age is very familiar with these words and uses them to bolster the argument that Jesus will return in our lifetime.  I personally still have plenty of good reason to believe he is coming soon, but I no longer use this passage as an argument for the case because it is not what Jesus meant.  The people who were there that day heard him correctly!

Of those today who are familiar with these words of Jesus, the vast majority of them could not quote from memory the next verse, which was undoubtedly spoken in the very next breath. Yet virtually every one of them knows this passage and has likely quoted it as many times as the former verse. The reason is because there is no direct connection that one can draw between the traditional interpretations of these two statements.  Yet it should be painfully obvious there must be a connection.  Both verses together read:

“Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things are fulfilled. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will by no means pass away.”   Matt 24:34,35   NKJV

See the connection?  The people heard Jesus correctly that day and they knew he was talking about them. But what has been missed is that Jesus was not referring to them and their physical bodies passing away.  He was referring to them in a figure of speech.  He was talking about that generation’s testimony and their record of the prophetic words he had spoken.   Every time we pick up a Bible and read what Jesus had prophesied concerning events just before his return, we are seeing thisprophecy fulfilled in front of our eyes. We are in a figure, bringing to life that generation and their testimony of Jesus’s words.  Neither has that generation’s testimony, nor Jesus’s words passed away!  It is inconceivable to think that they still might when we consider the millions of Bibles in print all over the world and how close we are to Jesus’s return.

From this example alone, one can see the importance of not letting an interpretation stand alone out of its context.

What also needs to be seen in all of this and how it relates to John’s prophecy is that Jesus was not referring to the physical bodies of the people of that generation, but was speaking of their testimony.  Also take notice of the words “pass away” and their correlation to the word “remain” in John’s prophecy. For what does not pass away, obviously must remain!

By now one might begin to see where this is going. But I would first like to further support this thesis with one more short example of a similar misunderstanding found in John. Here Jesus says:

“Most assuredly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. …for my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.”  …Therefore many of his disciples, when they heard this, said, “This is a hard saying. Who can understand it?”          John 6: 51,55,60   NKJV

Jesus gives the disciples the interpretation in verse 63.

“It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life.”

Here again, in spite of the fact that Jesus had appeared emphatic that his flesh and blood were edible by using the word “indeed“, he was not literally talking about his physical flesh and blood. He was speaking about his words, his testimony. The same as in Matthew and Luke, when he spoke of the generation that would “not pass away”. He was not speaking of their literal physical bodies, but of their word, which was their testimony.

In John 15:16 Jesus said to his disciples:

“You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit, and that your fruit should remain.”

It was indeed Jesus’s will that John remain.  And he has!  Every time we read the gospel of John or the book of Revelation, Jesus’s words are being fulfilled in front of our eyes.

 Back to Peter

Now that we understand Jesus’s prophecy concerning John, we should be able to use it to help interpret his prophecy concerning Peter. The disciples were right in assuming a connection between the two. But let’s go back to the beginning of the particular discourse in which both of these prophecies are found so we can see the beautiful underlying theme that Jesus had on his mind throughout the entire scene… and from which he never swerves from start to finish.

To set the scene, Jesus has appeared to his disciples the third time after his resurrection, and this time while they were fishing. He fills their net with fish then says, “Come eat breakfast.”  After breakfast they get up and go for a walk. The discourse begins.

Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon, son of Jonah, do you love me more than these?” He said to him, “Yes Lord; You know that I love You.” He said to him, “Feed my lambs”. He said to him a second time, “Simon, son of Jonah, do you love me?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; You know that I love You.” He said to him, “Tend my sheep.” He said to him the third time, “Simon, son of Jonah, do you love me?” Peter was grieved because he said to him the third time, “Do you love me?” And he said to him, “Lord, You know all things; You know that I love You.” Jesus said to him, “Feed my sheep. Most assuredly I say to you, when you were younger, you bound yourself and walked where you wished; but when you are old, you will stretch forth your hands, and another will bind you and take you where you do not wish.”    John 21:15-18

Is it not obvious, that what was on Jesus’s mind in this scene is the feeding of his sheep after he left?  And how else could Peter possibly accomplish this other than by telling others of what he had seen and heard?  Again the issue is the same.  Jesus was concerned about Peter’s words, his testimony, his record of what he had seen and heard over the previous three and one half years. This is the very same underlying theme of John’s prophecy as has been shown.  It was John’s word… his testimony… his record that would remain intact until Jesus returned.  Not his physical body.

This entire scene begins with Jesus talking about someone’s testimony, and it ends with Jesus’s prophecy about someone’s testimony.  All that is left between is Jesus’s prophecy concerning Peter! Would it not be safe to assume that he was speaking about Peter’s testimony as opposed to Peter physically?

Before continuing, there is one more interesting fact should be added to this equation.

In the Gospel of John, it is recorded 25 times that Jesus used the emphatic phrase, “most assuredly, I say to you…“.  The King James translation reads, “verily, verily, I say to you…“.   In the passage we are dealing with, this phrase is used for the last time in the gospel as an introduction to Peter’s prophecy.  In every other instance in which this strong introduction is used, what is said by Jesus immediately following it has a direct connection to something that was said earlier in the same discourse.  In other words, it cannot be found that Jesus just up and threw out a bit of information in this manner for free without something having been said previously to precipitate it.  In this last case there is no exception to the well established rule. But we would have to make the first exception here if we were to except the traditional interpretation of Peter’s prophecy.  The old interpretation is clearly an issue of how Peter would die. Peter’s feeding of the sheep with his word and testimony has no relevance or connection to the thought of how Peter might die.

Now we have from both before and after the prophecy, strong evidence to suggest that what Jesus said to Peter has nothing to do with Peter’s physical life and death.  Instead it had everything to do with his word and testimony, which are the care and feeding of Jesus’s sheep.

Conclusion

So what did Jesus mean when he said to Peter:

“…Feed my sheep. Most assuredly I say to you, when you were younger, you bound yourself and walked where you wished; but when you are old, you will stretch forth your hands, and another will bind you and lead you where you do not wish.”

Jesus was saying to Peter that if he loved him, he should feed his sheep by telling them the truth about what he had seen and heard for the past three and a half years while being with him.  But beware, in the future when Peter was older, he would stretch forth his hands to feed the sheep and “another” would “bind” him and take him where he did not want to go.  And where could that be other than away from feeding the sheep as he should?  Jesus was in effect saying to Peter… ‘Your accurate testimony to  my sheep is very important to me.  But someone will come along to turn you from this mission. That direction, you do not want to go!’

After Jesus had spoken this prophecy to him, he said, “Follow me”.  But Peter immediately began to concern himself with John.  It would appear that this question was indicative of the lack of focused stability in Peter which would ultimately lead to his being led into error by someone else, because Jesus answered the question with… “I will that he remain till I come! What is that to you? You follow me.”

Now that we understand Jesus’s prophecy concerning Peter, the question remains:  Who is the “other” that was to come along and bind Peter and take him away from feeding the sheep with the truth as he should?  You guessed it.  It was none other than the false apostle, and liar… Paul!

Paul binds Peter

So how did Paul bind Peter and take him where he did not want to go? He continues to do it today!  It is in the same way that Jesus’s prophecy concerning John is fulfilled every time we read the Gospel of John. For John (his testimony) has remained!  Every time someone quotes Peter’s words from 2Peter 3:15,16, claiming that Peter called Paul’s writings Holy Scripture, they are fulfilling Jesus’s prophecy concerning Peter. For it is they who are helping Paul to bind Peter, and are taking Peter (his testimony) where neither he nor Jesus wanted him to go!  Which is in support of Paul…,  against the Law!

Observational Note

Seeing that the disciples who heard Jesus’s prophecy concerning Peter completely misunderstood it, and how their interpretation has been considered infallible down through the ages, I can’t help but wonder how few there are who have understood Jesus’s words since he spoke them. http://www.judaismvschristianity.com/index.htm#

 

* Foot Note.  There are those who maintain that the book of 2 Peter is not authentic based on its grammatical structure and the treatment it received by the early “Church Fathers”. The issue is neither here nor there when it comes to the prophecy that Jesus gave to Peter as found in the Gospel of John, which book is relatively unquestioned in its authenticity. Interestingly enough, Jesus’s prophecy is fulfilled either way, whether Peter actually penned these words or not. Peter is still being bound by this passage and taken where he does not want to go…  in support of Paul, against the law!  

The Ravenous Wolf : Fake Apostles Paul tries to Infiltrate The Disciples!

JAMES asks THE FALSE APOSTLE Paul the hard questions!

 

With a raised eyebrow, James looks at Paul and says:

 And they are informed of thee that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to “FORSAKE” Moses, saying that they ought NOT to “CIRCUMCISE” their children, NEITHER to walk after the “CUSTOMS.” ACTS 21:21

 

Wow! James didn’t pull any punches or sugar-coat his questions did he? Notice that James is not asking Paul what he is teaching the Gentiles as our ministers have overlooked. James is asking Paul what he is teaching the “JEWS” that live among the Gentile nation.James hears Paul alleged claims that he has been converted to the ministry. So it is now question and answer time for Paul! It is now time for Paul to either: “Put up or shut up!” James asks Paul, if the rumors are true that he is teaching the Jews that they should forsake the Laws of Moses and also not circumcise their children. The tension mounts! While Paul thinks about how to answer James’ question, let’s skip ahead and see if the rumors are true Did Paul teach against “circumcision” and that Jesus ended the laws of Moses and the “Ordinances?”·

For neither CIRCUMCISION counts for anything nor UNCIRCUMCISION but keeping the commandments of God. 1ST CORINTHIANS 7:19 

According to Paul God’s law of circumcision is stupid and useless? Does Paul teach us that it was Jesus that causes the end of circumcision? Oh yes!·         Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be CIRCUMCISED Christ shall profit you nothing. GALATIANS 5:2 As you can see the rumors are correct Paul says above that if the Jews continue circumcising their children then the message of Jesus is of no good to them! Huh? Seeing as he has never heard Jesus’ message at all, how does Paul know any of this? While Paul is still thinking about what to tell James, let’s look at more of Paul’s original doctrine. Did Paul teach against the Laws of Moses? Yes he did:·

For “I TESTIFY” again to every man that is CIRCUMCISED, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.4.  Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are FALLEN FROM GRACE. GALATIANS 5:3, 4 

So are we to believe that the Jews have fallen from God’s grace because they continue to obey God’s covenant of circumcision? This man is a liar!

·         Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to “ORDINANCES.” COLOSSIANS 2:20 

Paul asks the question why he should have to follow the “ordinances” of Moses if he believes in Jesus. Why would Paul even ask such a ridiculous question? Where is he getting this stuff from? We know it wasn’t from Jesus or the true Disciples. Lastly, as concerning the end of the Laws of Moses Paul says the following:·

 “BLOTTING OUT” the Handwriting of “ORDINANCES”that was AGAINST US which was contrary to us, and took it OUT OF THE WAY, nailing it to his cross. COLOSSIANS 2:14 

You can see from Paul’s own letters that he openly taught against circumcision. Paul also taught the Jews that when Jesus died on the cross, He allegedly “blotted out” the written Laws of Moses. Paul claims Jesus did this because the laws were all contrary and against us. Wow! What a liar !!!! Now you know the truth! Now let’s return to the confrontation between James and Paul!(Personal note) The Disciples did not have access to Paul’s private “EPISTLES” like we have today in the verses above. James is patiently waiting for an answer from Paul about the rumors. There was no way for James to know what you and I know about Paul’s epistles. Other than being in actual attendance and hearing the messages of Paul James has no way of knowing if what the people are accusing Paul of is true. So what is Paul’s answer to the question? The scriptural verses do not give us Paul’s response to James’ question. However, when reading Acts 21 verses 22 thru 25, you can come to the conclusion that Paul tells James that the rumors are all false.   How can we come to that conclusion? Well we can conclude this because if Paul would have confirmed the rumors that he was teaching against the law then James would have known the total truth about Paul’s lies and that he was setting a trap for him and the other Disciples! Could you imagine what James would have done if he knew Paul actually said the following verses?·

For Christ is the “END OF THE LAW” for righteousness to everyone that believeth. ROMANS 10:4·         For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are“NOT UNDER THE LAW” but under grace. ROMANS 6:14 

Do you think if James would have heard or read the two verses above from Paul that James would think Paul was a man of God? Of course not! James and the other followers of Jesus might have killed Paul on the spot. Since James did not know of verses like the ones above Paul is temporarily safe. Still unsure about Paul, in Acts 21:22-25 James decides to test Paul’s character and make him prove himself to them and to the other Jews at the festival.  James orders Paul to go into the temple with four new converts of Jesus’ original ministry and perform the sin purification ritual in front of everyone! Now what was James’ reason for making Paul do these rituals? The end of verse 24 tells us the reason and also tells us what Jesus actually taught the true Disciples as well:·

      …and all may “know” that those things whereof they were informed of thee, are “NOTHING”; but that thou (PAUL) thyself also walkest orderly, and “KEEPEST THE LAW.” ACTS 21:24 

Compare the difference in the doctrines of Paul verses to that of the true Disciples of Jesus. Paul says the law has ended yet James says the law has not ended. Which one of these men should we believe? The one personally taught by Jesus to obey the law or the one who only claims to have seen an imaginary vision of Jesus? People with common sense will choose James because Jesus told him the truth. However we all know that common sense is really not all that “common” is it? Let’s continue…James tells Paul that he must do the purification ritual to prove to the people that the rumors about him were lies and that HE/PAUL does walk righteously and KEEPS THE LAW: Guess what folks? The purification offering includes the ritual of the: “ANIMAL SACRIFICES!” Yes the same ritual that Christians claim Jesus ended! I thought you should know… Now you and I have already read and know that Paul didn’t keep the law. We’ve already read the scriptures where Paul said that Jesus freed us from such purification rituals of the Mosaic Law right? So if Paul were a true Apostle of Jesus as he claims, Paul was supposed to refuse the order of James to enter into the temple to perform the rituals. If Paul were sincere about serving Jesus’ ministry then Paul was supposed to tell James directly to his face that Jesus freed us from the laws of Moses as he said in Galatians below! ·

For “I TESTIFY” again to every man that is CIRCUMCISED, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.4.  Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are FALLEN FROM GRACE. GALATIANS 5:3, 4 

Being the coward that he is, Paul does not say any of this to James. So what do you think Paul’s response was when James gave Paul a direct order? Let’s see: ·

Then PAUL took the men, and the NEXT DAY purifying HIMSELF with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification until that an OFFERING should be offered for every one of them. ACTS 21:26 

The early Jewish Christians continued to do what Jesus instructed them to do, which is to follow the laws of Moses including the following: 1.    Circumcising their sons.2.     Purification rituals of animal sacrifices in the temples 3.     Keeping the traditions of their fathers. 4.     Some of them even continued to take the Nazarite vow, which was a Mosaic practice of dedicating oneself to God and following strict rules of purity. (See Numbers 6:1-21.) If Paul’s vision of Jesus was real then his loyalty should have been to Jesus and not with the Disciples. Paul’s obligation to Jesus would be to teach James and the other Disciples this new truth. Paul was supposed to teach them that Jesus has freed them from the rituals under the “LAW” and that we are now under “GRACE” and not under the “Law?” Paul should have used the words that he said in Galatians:·

 For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. For I through the law amdead to the law, that I might live unto God. GALATIANS 2:18, 19 

In his secret gospels Paul says the following words as concerning obeying the Laws of Moses:·         “If I now decide to obey the laws of Moses, the same laws which I Paul have destroyed in the minds of the people, then I have once again made myself a sinner. I will not do that ever again because I am dead to God’s laws!” Now the above scripture is what Paul taught outside of the ear range of James and the other Disciples. This would be a bold and dynamic statement of faith if Paul would have said these things to James. However, Paul’s true cowardly character comes out instead and Paul ignores his own gospels and does what James commands! Does that make any sense! This proves to us that Paul would do anything to fool the Disciples and the people and get them to trust him.  Paul writes to us and admits he does these very things often:You shouldn’t be surprised at Paul’s actions because remember, infiltrating the ranks of the Disciples was his initial mission.·

To the Jews I became as a (JEW), in order to win Jews; to those under the law I became as one under the LAW–-THOUGH (not being) myself under the law–that I might win those under the law. 1st CORINTHIANS 9:20 

Paul admits that even though he really does not obey any of the Mosaic Law, he pretended to be a JEW so that he could win them over. Paul is a deceiver/Satan!  Paul’s only reason for going into the Temple and doing the Laws of Moses was to fool the Disciples. Paul will do or say anything to be accepted by the Jews and by the Disciples… Now Paul has done as James commanded and performed all of the rituals of the Mosaic Law. So far Paul has successfully hid his true ministry from James and the other disciples. Paul now feels like his mission of infiltrating the ranks of the Disciples is near. Since there was no one around to dispute Paul about the lies in his ministry, Paul feels like he has accomplished his task of successfully convincing James that he is a sincere convert. Paul feels like he is about to be officially embraced by the Disciples until something drastic happens! Unexpected guests!·         And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and laid hands on him. ACTS 21:27 Asian Jews have traveled down to Israel for the great festival. They have heard Paul’s hidden gospels up close! We now have witnesses that can testify against Paul’s lying ministry! Let’s see what they had to say:·

Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men everywhere against the people, and the LAW, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place.ACTS 21:28 

Wooooooow! Paul is now busted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Paul lied right to James’ face and said that he does obey all of the laws of Moses. Paul even went as far as going into the temple and offering the animal sacrifices just to prove to James and the others that he is sincere. The Asian Jews have just revealed Paul’s hidden ministry to all of the Jews at the festival and temple. James now knows the truth and there is nothing Paul can say. The infiltration plan of Paul’s has failed miserably! James knows that Paul is the false prophet that Jesus warned him and the other Disciples about earlier in Matthew 24: ·

For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show GREAT SIGNS and WONDERS insomuch that, if it“WERE” possible, they shall deceive the very ELECT. MATTHEW 24:23-25 

James is not deceived and neither are the “ELECT/CHOSEN” Jews!In Acts 21: 30 39 James withdraws and leaves this liar to deal with the angry Jewish mobs. The angry mob seizes Paul and starts to beat him unmercifully in the streets. Suddenly the Roman soldiers step in and seize Paul saving him from the hands of the Jewish mob. Even though the truth has come out about his true intentions Paul attempts to reason with the angry Jews. It is in Acts 22:1-21 that Paul then tries to convince the Jews of his alleged Damascus Road Conversion story. After the Jews hear all of the heinous things that he has done they know he is not one of them and proclaim the following:·

And they gave him audience unto this word, and then lifted up their voices, and said, away with such a fellow from the earth: for it is not fit that he should live. ACTS 22:22 

To quiet the screams of the crowds Paul is placed in shackles and led away into the castle by the Roman guards. All is now over right? Wrong! It is just beginning…I am above the law!  I AM A ROMAN!  Paul of Tarsus…Paul is arrested for incensing a riot among the Jews near the Hebrew Temple.In Acts 22 Paul now knows that his infiltration plans have vanished. Seeing no reason to keep up the charade of being “Jewish,” Paul shows his true nature again. He is now a ROMAN!The Chief Captain commands the Soldiers to bind and whip Paul until he confesses his crimes against the people. Fearful, Paul wants to save his own skin and now decides that he is no longer a filthy “JEW” but instead an honorable and distinguished “ROMAN!”

• And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said unto the centurion that stood by, is it lawful for you to scourge a man that is a “ROMAN” and un-condemned? ACTS 22:25

Since the chances of being accepted by James are totally over Paul decides to pull out his Roman badge of honor before the soldiers can punish him. Paul is not fearful of these soldiers because he knows that no true Roman can be beaten by a lowly civil servant soldier.

• Then the Chief Captain came and said unto him, Tell me art thou a “ROMAN?” (HE/(PAUL) SAID YEA)! ACTS 23:27

The Captain doesn’t beat Paul and sets him free. Are you a“JEW“ or are you “ROMAN?“   My Brothers and Sisters as you can see Paul is a Chameleon. He will change his colors, religions or ethnicity whenever it is in HIS best interests!  If it walks like a devil, if it talks like a devil, then it usually is a“DEVIL!” Paul never feared these soldiers at all because he had gone through this process once before in an earlier chapter of ACTS and acknowledged himself to be a ROMAN there as well:

• And the keeper of the prison told this saying to Paul. The magistrates have sent to let you go: now therefore depart, and go in peace. But Paul said unto them, they have beaten us openly uncondemned,BEING ROMANS, and have cast us into prison; and now do they thrust us out privily? Nay verily; but let them come themselves and fetch us out. And the sergeants told these words unto the magistrates: and they feared, when they heard that THEY WERE ROMANS.  And they came and besought them, and brought them out, and desired them to depart out of the city. ACTS16: 36-39

So as you can see Paul is very clever and he knows how to avoid hazardous situations. Let’s get back to the end of the story… The Roman Captain saves Paul from the hands of the mob. The Jews are outraged that the Roman soldiers have taken Paul from them. In Acts 24:1-9 Ananias the high priest does not know that Paul was working for the Greco-Romans and goes to the governor to demand custody of Paul. The Governor lets Paul speak in his own defense about the accusations against him:·

 “Because that thou mayest understand, that there are yet but twelve days since I went up to Jerusalem for to worship. And they neither found me in the temple disputing with any man, neither raising up the people, neither in the synagogues, nor in the city; neither can “they” PROVE the things whereof they now accuse me. ACTS 24:11, 13 

Just like he lied to James, once again Paul lies to the Jews and conceals his true Satanic ministry. As we can see Paul is in total denial of his own Gospels. Paul smugly pleads for his freedom because none of his accusers can prove that he was teaching against the Laws of Moses. Guess what? Paul is right on that point because there are no tape recorders or video to show his lies! No one can prove this unless his gospel letters show up or one of the Greeks come and testify, and we know that is not going to happen.You are not going to believe what Paul says next!·          

“But this I CONFESS UNTO THEE that after the way which they call HERESY, SO WORSHIP “I” the God of my fathers, BELIEVING “ALL THINGS” which are written in “THE LAW” and in the Prophets. ACTS 24:14, 15 

Can you believe the lies this man will swear to even in a court of law? Paul makes a Solemn Oath and SWEARS in front of the eyes of God and says:·         “Oh council I SWARE TO YOU, the Heresy these men speak about me is untrue! “I worship ONLY the God of our Fathers and I don’t believe that Jesus was the Messiah, I believe and FOLLOW all of the things (CIRCUMCISION INCLUDED) which are written in the LAW?  Huh? Does this man have a conscience at all? How can he stand in the eyesight of God and then swear that he believes and obeys all things which are written in the “Laws of Moses?” We know that this man is a total liar because of verses like the ones below:·

I became as one under the LAW–-THOUGH not being (Myself) under the LAW. 1ST CORINTHIANS 9:20 &·         Just remember that God “DOESN’T CARE” whether“WE (EAT) IT OR NOT,” We are “NO WORSE OFF” if WE “DON’T” eat it, and “NO BETTER OFF” if WE “DO” eat it. TYNDALE 1ST CORINTHIANS 8:8 

Is it okay to lie in front of God to save your own life? No! Paul lies over and over again. Now after being captured and facing death Paul abandons his own gospel views of Jesus and claims that he absolutely believes all of the Laws of Moses and that he follows every part of it and every statute: What is your opinion of Paul now? Johnny Cochran couldn’t do a better job of defense than this! According to Paul’s own testimony, we are not under “Grace” but we are still under the Laws of Moses! Did Paul forget his own writings when he claims YHWH made a big mistake and gave us a faulty Law that no one could follow?·

For “IF” the first covenant had been “FAULTLESS” then should no place have been sought for the second. “For finding “FAULT” with them, he saith, Behold, the days come saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah.” HEBREWS 8:7,8 

Clearly this man believed YHWH was a God of errors before his trial. Wouldn’t you expect Satan to confess the very same words?Total Blasphemy here folks! So according to Paul YHWH is a faulty God and gave us a law to purposely lead us to Hell. Amazing huh? Paul then goes on to misquote and pervert Jeremiah 31:31 for his own satanic purposes! If this man cannot make up his own mind about who he will serve why should we listen to him at all? Now remember Paul told us that Jesus allegedly became our last sacrifice! This means he believes no other Mosaic sacrifice was needed. By Paul’s own admission he lies and tells the Council that his original purpose for coming to Jerusalem was to eagerly and willingly offer up Alms and to perform the Purity Animal Sacrifices cleansing rituals in the temple:·

Now after many years “I CAME” to bring “ALMS” to my nation, and “OFFERINGS.” ACTS 24:17 

As we can see from Paul’s own mouth he did not represent YHWH or Jesus! Now some may say that Paul is saying that he only came to pay taxes and/or to do charity work. That is not true because of the next verse:·

Whereupon certain Jews from Asia found me“PURIFIED” in the “TEMPLE”, neither with multitude, nor with tumult. ACTS 24:18 

Here we have Paul blaming the Asian Jews for his troubles! Remember it was these Asian Jews that exposed Paul’s treachery to James, the head of the original Disciples. IFJesus has freed us from the sacrifice then explain why Paul is doing the Purification ritual in the Temple? When referring back to the beginning of this chapter you will see the reason why Paul was doing the purification ritual. It was only to fool the True Disciples into believing and accepting Paul into the ministry.   If Paul really represented God he would have, as he lies about in his gospels, “BOLDLY PROCLAIMED” the Gospel of Jesus Christ had Jesus actually said anything to Paul. We now know that Jesus said nothing to Paul period. Lastly, Paul is arrested and spends two years in jail. After Paul is released he is a beaten and broken man. Two years of imprisonment builds up a lot of animosity and hatred for the Disciples. Paul still knows that there is money to be made in what he is teaching and after his release Paul starts once again preaching his poisonous message to the foreign Jews and Gentiles. Even though Paul will never be accepted by the true Disciples of Jesus, Paul knows that there is still a chance to reap a financial harvest by claiming to be an Apostle of Jesus. Paul leaves Jerusalem and goes throughout the Gentile countries and converts them to his warped style of Jesus. Before Paul’s ministry started, the Jewish followers of Jesus were no different from any other Jew. These new converts of Paul needed an exciting new name. Acts 11:26 lets us know where the term Christian really came from. It was from Paul! ·

 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christiansfirst in Antioch. ACTS 11:26 

The term: Christian came from the Gentile lands of Paul’s travels. Now you officially know the history of the word Christian. You now know more than your own ministers…The Disciples of Jesus are known abroad in other countries. Paul knows that the information highway is very slow. No one in the Gentile countries will know that James didn’t trust Paul and that Paul’s true treachery was uncovered in Jerusalem. Paul uses this knowledge to his advantage and preaches throughout the lands. To the lands that are familiar with James and the other Disciples, Paul secretly uses James as a reference to win over the Jewish and Gentile people in the foreign lands. Let’s read the lies of Paul:·         And when James, Cephas (Peter) and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision. GALATIANS 2:9 Wow! This man has no conscience at all! The Galatians did not know that Paul was lying. James never gave Paul the right hand of fellowship. James never commissioned Paul to teach a doctrine exclusively to the Gentiles communities. Paul started teaching the pagan Gentiles because the Asian Jews exposed Paul’s false doctrines to the original Disciples and they no longer wanted anything to do with Him! Paul’s false teaching doctrine became so outrageous that even two of his own followers Silas and Timotheuscould no longer accept his lies!Let’s look at the proof of this point directly from the scriptures: In the beginning of Acts chapter 18 verses 1 thru 4, Paul is teaching the Jews and Greeks his warped gospel version in the synagogue along with another Jewish man by the name of Aquila.  Even though you see the word “Greeks” in the verse it does not necessarily mean the Anglo Pagan Greeks. Remember the scripture says that Paul was teaching inside of the actual Synagogues every Sabbath. Pagan Greeks were not permitted into the Holy temples. So this means that Paul was teaching Grecian Jews in the temple and not the Gentiles. (Remember this point). In verse 4 the scripture lets us know that Paul was not only reasoning and teaching the Jews inside of the temple it says that he was also persuading most of them to his side of thinking. Silas and Timothy come to town and hear what Paul is teaching the Jews and openly opposes Paul’s doctrine:·

And when they (Timothy/Silas) opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean; from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles. ACTS 18:6 

So as you can see this confrontation between Silas and Timothy was the turning point when Paul separates himself from the Jews. There were many rumors that Paul was teaching against circumcision and against the Laws of Moses. Silas is finally able to hear Paul’s satanic gospels first hand and openly rebukes Paul for teaching a false doctrine inside of the synagogues. Paul is outraged that two of his own converts have opposed him in front of the other Jews. James wouldn’t accept Paul, the other Disciples wouldn’t accept Paul and now two of his own fellow Jews have also rebuked him and his false gospels.Paul get’s angry and says from “Henceforth” which means: “FROM THIS POINT ON!” So from that particular point of time and on, Paul decides to denounce Judaism and the true message of Jesus and invents his own doctrines and teaches the world a false gospel that is backed with torture, greed and rape. Paul is free from the Laws of Moses to become the foremost authority of the satanic pagan inspired gospel of the Gentiles which is known today as: Romanized Christianity.

Paul is the enemy and adversary of God.  Never let the sons of Satan lead you astray again. Shalom/Salaam/Selah…

Relate Article :

Apostle Paul’s Lies and Sexual Perversion EXPOSED!

Did Jesus Met Paul?

 The Bible says NO!Jesus NEVER met Paul! 

 [ Please share if you like it !! ]  It was recorded that before the so-called crucifixion took place Jesus(as) was reportedly to have said that after his ascension to his Father, he can no longer be seen by his disciples and he can only be seen on his Second Coming!!!   This was recorded in  John 16:10 KJV Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more;    One of the prominent Bible commentator Albert Barnes explained accurately the phrase “and ye see me no more” as                              

And ye see me no more – That is, he was to be taken away from them, and they would not see him until his return to judgment; yet this source of grief to them would be the means of establishing his religion and greatly blessing others.

  [ Online Source : http://biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes/john/16.htm ]   Another Bible Commentator – Matthew Poole, too, clearly explain while commenting on John 16:10

 …. and you see me no more … wrote :And (saith our Saviour) ye see me no more; that is, after my ascension you shall see me no more; or after my death you shall see me no more, to have any such ordinary converse with me as hitherto you have had: for I shall not ascend to return again to you; but to sit at the right hand of my Father, till I return again to the last judgement.

  [ Online Source : http://biblehub.com/commentaries/poole/john/16.htm ]   Now, the question that would arise here is, If Jesus was very clear in John 16:10, that he canNOT be seen anymore when he ascend,  then who was that so-called “Christ” who appeared to Paul on his way Damascus???     Now, we have a problem here folks!!!   1. Jesus might be lying on John 16:10 & 16, or   2. It was NOT actually Jesus whom Paul met! If Jesus was not LYING and definitely he dont lie, then can it be possible that Jesus warning in Matthew 24 was being fulfilled by Paul of Tarsus?   Lets look at those verses that Jesus warns of his disciples; Matthew 24:4-5 KJV And Jesus answered and said unto THEM, Take heed that no man deceive YOU. 5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. {{ Take note of the pronoun YOU, THEM. Jesus was warning his immediate disciples that,  soon they – The disciples SHALL meet this “FALSE CHRIST” who pretend to be or disguised as Jesus in flesh!!! }}   Matthew 24:11 KJV And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. {So manywill be deceived! Are the Fake-Christians or Paulinian Followers few in numbers??}          Matthew 24:23-26 KJV Then if any man shall say unto YOU, Lo, here is Christ, or there;believe it not. 24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. 25 Behold, I have told YOU before. 26 Wherefore if they shall say unto YOU, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. {{ Take note of the pronoun “YOU”, “THEM”. Jesus was warning his immediately disciples and NOT Us the later generation! }}   NB. Please read this video for more exposition of Matthew 24: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwMHfgn_Gsg   ================================================= Jesus gave us this warning and I can’t help but notice it seems to match the circumstances leading to Paul’s conversion while on his way to Damascus (Acts 9:3-5) Matthew 24:26 “So if anyone tells you, ‘There he is, out in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here he is, in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. The place immediately surrounding Damascus is a desert (wilderness): bibleatlas.org... ( http://bibleatlas.org/damascus.htm )The Greek word used in Matthew 24:26 to describe “wilderness” is ἐρήμῳ which means desolate, lonely, solitary. A desert is as desolate as it can be. Acts 9 describes Paul nearing Damascus in his journey when he encountered a supernatural event which he claimed to be an encounter with Jesus which clearly puts him in the desert wilderness. Paul’s conversion experience cross references in Acts: http://biblehub.com/acts/9-3.htmIn some of these cross referenced verses, Paul is practically telling other people that he saw Jesus in the wilderness (the place near Damascus)!!Given the many apparent contradictions of the teachings of Paul against the teachings of Jesus, it doesn’t seem surprising that Paul would match person(s) Jesus warned us about in Matthew 24:26! And it gives us confirmation those contradictory teachings of Paul, are not just apparent, they absolutely contradictory!========================================================   BOOK OF REVELATIONS also speaks of FALSE APOSTLE!    Revelation 2:2 KJV  I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:   Now, as far as the Rev 21:14 is concerned, there are only TWELVE APOSTLES! There is NO SUCH AS 13th Apostle!!!   But some less learned Christians might argue that Paul replaced Judas! No it cant be possible.   Judas was replaced by Matthias on Acts 1:26!   Paul claim that he is an apostle therefore fulfilled Rev 2:2 and Matthew 24:4-5, 11, 23-26! Revelation 21:14 KJV  And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.St John – CONFIRMED That the Anti-Christ was already co-existing with them !!!   St Jude – The Half Brother of Jesus also CONFIRMED that ANTI-CHRIST has already joined them!! 

APOSTLE PAUL’S SATANIC CONTRADICTIONS AGAINST JESUS and GOD!

PAUL’S SATANIC CONTRADICTIONS.

Here is a list of some of the contradictory statements from Paul. I want you to notice just how different Paul’s gospels are than the gospels of Jesus, the true Disciples, the Old Testament Prophets and also The Heavenly Father- YHWH Almighty. So get your bibles ready and enjoy your spiritual journey. Shalom…

In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to MY GOSPEL. ROMANS 2:16

The Gospel of Paul is contained in the following epistles:

(Galatians, I Corinthians, II Corinthians, Romans, Philemon, Philippians)

Here is the list where Paul’s gospels clearly differ from the rest of the Bible:

Did God mention widows? Paul says:

·         Now concerning the unmarried (virgins), I have no command of the Lord, but I give my opinion as one who by the Lord’s mercy is trustworthy. 1^st CORINTHIANS. 7:25

·         A married woman is not free as long as her husband lives; but if her husband dies (widow), then she is free to be married to any man she wishes, but only if he is a Christian. 1^st CORINTHIANS. 7:39

·         “She will be happier, however, if she stays as she is. That is my opinion, and I THINK that I too have God’s Spirit.” 1^st CORINTHIANS. 7:40

Here now in 1^st Corinthians 7: 25, 39, and 40, Paul says that there are no rules for virgins. But like he also admits this is just his own opinion so his personal opinions should have never been allowed into the bible at all. Paul say virgins are free to marry anyone they want because he really does not know the Lord’s set rules concerning virgins. Paul says

“I Think I have God’s Spirit?”

So tell me Paul do you have God’s Spirit or don’t you?  Mr. Paul shouldn’t you know this difference if you are going to teach the people?  My Brothers and Sisters there is no mistaking the voice of God!  God speaks with a very clear distinct voice.

Now we know that Paul couldn’t tell exactly who he was serving. Moses has a contradictory answer concerning unmarried daughter/virgins.

MOSES says:

·         If two brothers live on the same property and one of them dies, leaving no son, then his widow is not to be married to someone outside the family; it is the duty of the dead man’s brother to marry her. DEUTERONOMY 25:5

As you can see God already had an established set of rules concerning widows. Now you know more than Paul.

HANGING IS A CURSE?

Is “Everyone” who hangs on a tree cursed?

PAUL says:

·         Christ redeemed us from the “curse” of the law, having become a “curse” for us for it is written, “Cursed be every one who hangs on a tree. GALATIANS 3:13

Now according to Paul, absolutely anyone who hangs on a tree is cursed by God. Now is that the truth? No it is not. What does Moses say in the Bible?

MOSES says:

·         And if a man has committed a crime punishable by death and he is put to death, and you hang him on a tree, his body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but you shall bury him the same day, for a hanged man is accursed by God. DEUTERONOMY 21:22, 23

Moses’ words prove to us that Paul’s words are wrong. Everyone that hangs on a tree is not cursed by God. According to Moses the only people that are actually cursed by God are those who have committed a punishable crime. Here we clearly see that Paul doesn’t know what the heck he is talking about. The first sign that we have that shows Paul doesn’t follow God is the first sentence of verse thirteen. Paul says:

“Christ redeemed us from the “curse” of the law.” GALATIANS 3:13

This sentence alone proves Paul is the devil. Outside of Paul’s ridiculous words do you think you can find anyone else in the bible that believes that God’s Holy law was designed to be a curse? Huh? Have you ever heard or read anything in the bible where Jesus ever said such nonsense? No, not at all!The second thing that is wrong with Paul’s words concerns what he says about Jesus. Since God curses only certain types, Paul’s definition does not apply to Jesus at all. Jesus did not commit a crime that was punishable by death so why would God curse Him? Even though we all sin, we always have a chance to return to His love and gentle care. Paul’swords were not from God.Here are other biblical writers that prove Paul misquoted the Old Testament verse:

Haman was not cursed, but instead he was another victim. God does not curse those who are murdered; God curses only people who are worthy of Murder. Sorry Paul, was not worthy of such a curse. (See: ESTHER 7: 10) 

Here we have three more writers in the bible that disagree with Paul and they also prove to us that Paul’s gospels are not from God…

The Chef who went against Pharaoh was not cursed by God.(See: GENESIS 40:19) Jesus once said:

·         Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. MATTHEW 5:10

So the Chef probably was blessed by God for resisting Pharaoh. So here again Paul’s understanding of the Old Testament is totally incorrect.

CIRCUMCISION?

Paul says that because of Jesus’ death the Jews are freed from circumcision. Now is that true?

·         Genesis 17:7, 10-11, the covenant of Circumcision is to be EVERLASTING.

·         Acts 21:21, 24 Jesus Disciples wanted to know if Paul was teaching lies against Circumcision.

·         Acts 21:24 The Disciples wanted Paul to prove to them that he believed in obedience to the circumcision law.

·         Galatians 6:15: Circumcision it is of no CONSEQUENCE? HUH?

Everlasting means forever! The circumcision ritual was a forever binding agreement between mankind and God. Just like a wedding ring, the circumcision ring was an outward “symbol” that says we/mankind agree to obey God’s holy laws and commandments. This practice was not going to end when any Messiah came to the earth and even Jesus clearly said in Matthew 5:18 that none of the Laws of Moses, including circumcision will end until the end times:

·         For verily “I SAY” unto you, till “HEAVEN” and EARTH“PASS”, one jot or one tittle shall in “NO WISE PASS FROM THE LAW.” MATTHEW 5:18

Now if Jesus says that the Jews must do the circumcision ritual forever what gives Paul the right to teach us to disobey God’s Law and Jesus’ words? As you can now see Paul is a devil!

·         Genesis 4:4-5: God prefers Abel’s offering and has no regard for Cain’s.

·         Romans 2:11: God shows no partiality. He treats all alike.

ARE THERE ANY RIGHTEOUS PEOPLE?

·         Genesis 7:1: Noah was righteous.

·         Job 1:1, 8, Job 2:3: Job was righteous.

·         Luke 1:6: Zechariah and Elizabeth were righteous.

·         James 5:16: some men are righteous.

·         Romans 3:10, 3:23: No one was or is righteous. HUH?

CAN WE OBEY THE LAW?

·         Deuteronomy 30:11-20: IT “IS” possible to keep the law.

·         Matthew 19:16 Jesus says IT “IS” possible to keep the law.

·         Romans 3:20-23: IT IS “NOT” possible to keep the law.

Jesus clearly says that keeping the Laws of Moses is how you gain “eternal life!” Wow! Paul is totally wrong!

How many Disciples did Jesus see after the alleged resurrection and where?

·         In Galilee to the eleven remaining disciples (Judas, is ALLEGEDLY dead at this time.)–Matthew. 27:17-18, Mark 16:7, 14.

·         In Jerusalem to the eleven–Luke.24: 33, 36.

·         In Jerusalem to the ten, Thomas being absent–John.20:19, 24.

·         To Peter and then to the twelve—1^st Cor.15: 5? Huh?

Houston! We have a problem! Who were the twelve, since Judas was ALLEGEDLY already dead in (Matt. 27:5) and his successor had not yet been chosen (Acts 1:26?) Answer: Judas was still alive!

These are only a few of Paul’s inconsistencies which clarify that Paul was not inspired by God and defied the teachings of God. Oh, there is more!

Who gave Moses the Law, the Angels or God?

·         Exodus 20:1-17: God gave the law directly to Moses without an intermediary.

·         Galatians 3:19: The law was ordained through angels (plural) by a mediator an intermediary.

When reading Exodus 20, it is clear that God is speaking directly to Moses. God is not sending multiple shifts of angels to teach the laws to Moses. Paul is once again wrong.

Sabbath Obedience?

·         Exodus 20:8-11, 31:15-17, 35:1-3: No work is to be done on the Sabbath, The commandment is permanent, and death is required for infractions.

·         Mark 2:27-28: Jesus says that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath (after his disciples were criticized for breaking the Sabbath).

·         Luke 23:56: Even after Jesus’ death his female Disciples knew to obey the Sabbath Day commandment.

·         Colossians 2:14-16: Paul says the Sabbath commandment was temporary, and to decide for yourself regarding its observance. HUH?

Dietary Law Obedience?

·         Leviticus 3:17: GOD himself prohibits forever the eating of blood and fat.

·         Acts 21:25 The Disciples inform Paul that God prohibits the eating of certain foods.

·         1^ST Corinthians 8:8 Paul like SATAN lies and says,“GOD does NOT CARE.”

·         Romans 14:21: Paul says: It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor anything that might cause your brother to stumble or be offended.

·         Colossians 2:16: Paul says: Let no one pass judgment on you in matters of food and drink.

As you can see, Paul first disobeys God’s commandments. Paul then teaches two contradicting rules to the Roman and the Colossian people. One of the true Disciples may have been in attendance in Rome forcing Paul to teach the truth against his will. Who knows? All we know is that both of these answers cannot be correct.

Numbers 25:9: 24,000 died in the plague.

1^st Corinthians 10:8 23,000 died in the plague.

Paul must have fell asleep in class during the great plague study lesson at Pharisee school that day.

Deuteronomy 24:16, 2^nd Kings 14:6, 2^nd Chronicles 25:4, Ezra 18:20 Children arenot to suffer for their parent’s sins.

Romans 5:12, 19, 1^st Corinthians 15:22: Death is passed to all men by the sin of Adam.

Has any human ever ascended to heaven?

·         2^nd Kings 2:11 Elijah ascended up to heaven.

·         John 3:13: Only the Son of Man (Jesus) has everascended to heaven.

·         2^nd Corinthians 12:2-4: an unnamed Disciple of Jesus, who was known only to Paul, ascended to heaven and came back. Huh?

People are going up and back from Heaven like a grocery store. This proves two things:

1.    Jesus never spoke the words of John 3:13 because all Jews knew that Elijah, Israel’s greatest prophet ascended to heaven.

2.    Paul lied and stole parts of the Old Testament story of Elijah. Paul invented a new Disciple of Jesus that allegedly ascended to heaven.

Paul never gave us a purpose for God allowing this new Disciple access to the third level of heaven. He said this only to prove to the Corinthians that his visions were coming from God. Total nonsense!

Wisdom?

·         Proverbs 3:13, 4:7, 19:8 Solomon says: “Happy is the man who finds wisdom.

·          James 1:5 James says that all men need to obtain wisdom.

·         Luke 2:40, 52 Jesus was filled with wisdom and found favor with God.

·         1^st Corinthians 1:19-25, 3:18-20 Wisdom is foolishness.

Matthew 7:21: not everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.

Romans 10:13: Whoever calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.

Are we Saved by Works or Faith?

·         Matthew 7:21, Luke 10:36-37, James 2:24: We are justified by WORKS, not by faith.

·         Romans 3:20-26, Galatians 2:16: We are justified by FAITH, not by WORKS.

So, according to Paul, James and Jesus are liars?

Matthew 28:19: Jesus instructs his Disciples to baptize.

1^st Corinthians 1:17: although he considers himself a disciple of Jesus, Paul says that he has not been sent to baptize.

Is it okay to be Boastful or Prideful?

·         Psalms 10:3: Only the wicked boasts.

·         Proverbs 8:13: God hates anyone who boasts.

·         Proverbs 11:2 Boasting brings forth “shame.”

·         Proverbs 14:3: Only fools boast.

·         Proverbs 16:18 Pride comes right before “destruction or devastation.”

·         Luke 18:9-14: Do not boast of your virtue.

·         Romans 11:20, 1^st Peter 5:5: do not be proud.

·         Romans 15:17, 2^ND Corinthians 1:12, Hebrews 3:6, 2^ndCorinthians 2:14, 5:12, and 11:17: Paul boasted of his faith and says that one should be proud of it.

I guess what Paul means is: Don’t do as I do, just do as I tell you?

John 3:17, 8:15 & 12:47: Jesus does not judge.

2^nd Corinthians 5:10: Jesus does judge.

Acts 9:23 the governor attempted to seize Paul.

2^nd Corinthians 11:32 It was the Jews who tried to seize Paul.

Acts 10:34, Romans 2:11 God shows no partiality He treats all alike.

Romans 9:11-13: God hated Esau and loved Jacob even before their birth?

Acts 16:6: The Holy Spirit forbids preaching in Asia.

Acts 19:8-10: Paul preaches in Asia anyway.

Romans 2:12: All who have sinned without the law will perish without the law.

Romans 4:15: Where there is no law there is no transgression (sin).

Romans 2:13: Doers of the law will be justified.

Romans 3:20, Galatians 3:11: They will not be justified. Make up your mind will you?

James 2:21: Abraham was justified by works; which made his faith perfect.

Romans 4:9: Abraham was not justified by works, but by faith alone?

Romans 10:11: (An alleged OT quote; no such statement in the OT.)

1^st Corinthians7: 8-9: Widows should not marry (although it is better to marry than burn).

Titus 5:14: Young widows should marry, bear children, rule the household, etc.

2^nd Corinthians: 12:16 Paul says that he does use trickery.

1^st Thessalonians: 2:3 Paul says that he does not use trickery.

Galatians 6:2: Bear one another’s burdens.

Galatians 6:5: Bear your own burden.

John 3:8-10: HE who commits sin is of the DEVIL. Children of God do not sin.

Titus 1:15: Paul says that HE is the foremost of sinners.

Paul is doing the work of his true father Satan!

1^st Thessalonians 2:2: God gave Paul the courage to continue his work.

1^st Thessalonians 2:17-18: Satan hindered Paul.

Look at the LIES concerning Paul’s so-called CONVERSION:

Acts 9:7: Those present at Paul’s conversion “HEARD” the voice but “SAW” no one.

AC 22:9: They “SAW” a light but didn’t “HEAR” a voice. Which one is it?

Acts 9:7: Those present at Paul’s conversion stood.

Acts 26:14: They fell to the ground.

(Acts 9:19-28) Shortly after his conversion, Paul went to Damascus, then to Jerusalem where he was introduced to the Apostles by Barnabas, and there spent some time with them going in and out among them?

(Galatians 1:15-20) He made the trip three years later, and then saw only Peter and James.  I will reveal more of this lie in the next chapter.

In conclusion, I hope this series of expose on the lies of Paul have helped you on your journey. God has given you a sound mind and reasonable understanding. This Man is obviously a man of SATAN. How many contradictions do you need to see for you to get the revelation that neither God nor Jesus ever spoke to Paul? What could Satan himself say that would be different than these very things that Paul says? Satan contradicts God, and so does Paul. Satan contradicts Jesus and so does Paul. Analyze for yourselves all of the verses in question. Then you decide.=========================More from the false prophet :

https://www.facebook.com/notes/abe-au/the-fake-apostles-paul-tries-to-infiltrate-the-disciples/10204736288359194

https://www.facebook.com/notes/abe-au/paul-is-the-false-apostle-that-jesus-spoke-about-in-revelation-22/10204880161955944

https://www.facebook.com/notes/abe-au/apostle-pauls-lies-are-exposed-part-1-of-3-/10203284856714310

https://www.facebook.com/notes/abe-au/the-apostle-pauls-lies-exposed-part-2-of-3/10203284849274124

https://www.facebook.com/notes/abe-au/the-apostle-pauls-lies-exposed-part-3-of-3/10203284825793537

Did The Law Of YHWH – The Torah Ended With Christ?

 

Aim of this note is to find out on how valid Paul’s claim regarding the Torah ( Law ) being no longer applicable.

Paul a Self-Made Apostle and who never met Jesus preached that Jesus was the End Of The Law, and Abolished the Law of God?

Now, How true that Jesus  was the END OF THE LAW?

For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth. [ Romans 10:4 KJV ]

And, How true that Jesus  ABOLISHED THE LAW?

by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, [Ephesians 2:15 ESV]

We too often hear from Paulinian Christians that salvation according to them is just simply  accept Jesus as your savior and have faith in Jesus and FORGET that STINKY, CURSED LAW of GOD!!! Sounds madness, insanity isn’t it?

Now where did these Paulinian Christians got this novel idea?

It was Paul who originally preached that obedience to Law Of God is no longer necessary. We read Paul saying;

But now we are delivered from the law, [Romans 7:6]

Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, [ Gal 2:16]

For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse [Gal 3:10]

In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old.Now that whichdecayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.[Heb 8:13]

Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us,and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;[Colossians 2:14 KJV]

Surprisingly, What the Muslims use to prove that Law of Moses was still in effect and binding was also the very teaching used by Paulinian to assert that Law is no longer binding.

Lets quote the very verses in question:

For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one title shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be “fulfilled.“[Matthew 5:18 KJV]

Christians argued that since the law according to them was already“fulfilled” oraccomplished thus in effects its no longer enforceable and binding! How tenacious and credible is Paulinian interpretation?
————————————————————————
There 3 ways actually to debunk this unfounded claims by the Christians;

 FIRST : Show lexically that”fulfilled” is not the appropriate word used when rendering the passage

SECOND : Show contextually that the intended meaning of the passage was to KEEP the Law Of Moses !

THIRD : Show some verses which correlate with what Jesus said.

Moving on…. Let us start with the
————————————————————————-

FIRST : Show lexically that“fulfilled” is not the appropriate word used when rendering the passage

The Greek word translated as “fulfilled” in  Matt 5:17 was  #4137 πληρόω “pleroo” {play-ro’-o}}
Looking at the lexicons, Greek “pleroo” has also a lot of possible meaning. Among those acceptable meaning are

“to perform”, “execute”, and “to fully preach”

Online source :  http://lexiconcordance.com/greek/4137.html

Here is the verse in question : Matthew 5:17

Online source : http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Mat&c=5&t=KJV#s=t_conc_934017

Now here and observed carefully The Old tricks they used – the usual dishonest translation :

Amazingly , The same Greek word“pleero”  was also used in  Romans 15:19… but this time it was correctly translated as “preached”!!!!

Through mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God; so that from Jerusalem, and round about unto Illyricum, I have fully preached {pleroo} the gospel of Christ. [Romans 15:19 KJV]

Online source  : http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Rom&c=15&t=KJV#s=t_conc_1061019

The context of the preceding verses( v12-v16) dictates that the disciples who were also deemed as “light” or guide  are duty bound to guide the mankind by following a certain set of rules or code ofethics and morality. This is the same true with what is intended meaning of  “pleero” in Romans 15:19. Guiding, instructing, and exemplifying the moral code, theological guidance that they carry.
However, inspite of same intended purpose, Paulinian Christians in order to uphold Paul’s doctrine, did not  use the accurate rendering of Greek “pleero” in Matthew 5:17. They dishonestly translated the Greek “pleero” as fulfilled.  But, in Romans 15:19 they accurately rendered it as “preached”.!!!!

Therefore, keeping in mind of the lexicons and the manner it was used in Romans 15:19,
Matthew 5:17-19 can also be therefore read as

Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to”pleero” {fully preached, perform, or execute }

——————————————————————————-

Moving on to the SECOND : Show contextually that the intended meaning of the passage was to KEEP the Law Of Moses !

Lets us cite the whole context to understand  what “pleero” in Mat 5:17 actually meant.

Matthew 5:12-21 KJV
12  Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

 

{  Jesus been encouraging here his  little flocks that Men of God, The Prophets and their successors in the past  were always  been persecuted for delivering the message of God to humanity. Thus to be persecuted and to suffer – a thing not to be mourned over, but as among the chief blessings of life. That is, the reward will be great in the future world.To those who suffer most, God imparts the highest rewards. Hence, the crown of martyrdom has been thought to be the brightest that any of the redeemed shall wear; and hence many of the early Muslims sought to become martyrs, and threw themselves in the way of their persecutors, that they might be put to death.  I am just wondring how this”rejoicing” can come along with “Jesus” seems reluctant to die on his prayer on garden of Gethsemane, and his last cry “My God My God why have you forsaken me?  }
13  Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.
{ Salt renders food pleasant and palatable, and preserves from putrefaction. So Muslims, by their lives and instructions, are to keep the world from entire moral corruption. By bringing down the blessing of God in answer to their prayers, and by their influence and example, they save the world from universal vice and crime}

14  Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.

{ The light of the world often denotes the sun, Joh_11:9. The sun renders objects visible, shows their form, their nature, their beauties, their deformities. The term light is often applied to religious teachers. See Mat_4:16; Luk_2:32; Joh_1:4; Joh_8:12;Isa_49:6. It is pre-eminently applied to Jesus in these places, because he is,in the moral world, what the sun is in the natural world. The Prophets and their successors, disciples, are lights of the world, because they, by their instructions and example, show what God requires, what is the condition of man,what is the way of duty, peace, and happiness the way that leads to heaven.}
15  Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.
{  Neither do men light a candle … -The word rendered “candle” means any portable light, as a lamp, candle,lantern. Compare Mar_4:21; Luk_8:16; Luk_12:35. Jesus proceeded here to show them that the very reason why they were enlightened/guided was that others might also see the light, and be benefited by it. When people light a candle,they do not conceal the light, but place it where it may be of use. So it is with religion. It is given that we may benefit others. It is not to be concealed, but suffered to show itself, and to shed light on a surrounding wicked world. }
16  Let your light so shine before men,that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

{ Let your light so shine … – Let your holy life, your pure conversation, and your faithful instructions, be everywhere seen and known. Always, in all societies, in all business, at home and abroad, in prosperity and adversity, let it be seen that you are real Servant Of God. ..That they may see your good works – The proper motive to influence us is not simply that we may be seen (compare Mat_6:1), but it should be that our One and Only Lord may be glorified.}

Can there be anything more clearer than that? It is so clear v12-v16 Jesus was exhorting them of their obligations, responsibilities in the matter of guiding humanity through proper conduct and right wisdom. Now here we comes for the  MISUNDERSTOOD verse :::
17  Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil / preach.

{  I guessed by now you  already have the idea of what Jesus had in mind when he said… “THINK NOT that I CAME TO DESTROY!!{Destroy what?}  THE LAW!  Now why would Jesus exhorted his disciples in v12-16 to be a light as a guide for the humanity if these disciple will not live with in a defined moral code, moral laws, ethics which is prescribed by God if it will end or fulfilled as what the Paulinian alleged? What standards or prescribed ways of living if we don’t have such a standards/Laws that would guide us in all our endeavors? Wouldn’t it become chaotic? That everyone will do whatever he please because there is no Law regulating his conducts? Certainly it would be. God can not allow us to live without a Laws prescribed by Him. Therefore, it is not logical that Jesus who knows his Father’s Will advocated that the Law ended or fulfilled by him! Matthew 5:17 therefore should have been correctly read as THINK NOT that I COME TO DESTROY/ABOLISHED the Law, BUT to FULLY PREACH and EXECUTE it { pleero }!!
18  For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

{ When will the heaven pass? The expression “Till heaven and earth pass” simply meansFOREVER!!  Jesus never put an “end” nor destroy The Law. }
19  Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
{ Why would Jesus warns “Whosoever therefore shall break one of these” if after all these Laws will be sooner to be ended by him??? The warning will make sense only if  the Laws will be continuously binding!}

20  For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

{  Why would Jesus criticized the man-made oral traditions of the Pharisees if the Law of Moses too will be made into nothing because he will put an end to it? It makes no sense of course unless The Law of Moses is still binding }
21  Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:

{ Why would Jesus mentioned here the Law of Moses if it be will ended as what the Christians alleged? It makes no sense unless of course if it will be still binding }

Finally, the sermon of Jesus in this chapter culminated in :

48 :Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

{ God is perfect!Our final goal is to be with Him who is Perfect and Holy!  Jesus is telling that it is ONLY through following the Law of God which led us into perfection!!!  Please compare this withPeople who reject Law Of Moses on Matthew 7:23 and 1 Cor 9:21  }
—————————————————————————————————
Moving on to the THIRD :  Show some verses which correlate with what Jesus said.

Except for Paul who considered The Law Of God as a CURSE,  Genuine Prophets and their Apostles unconditionally LOVE the Laws of God!!!

TORAH The Word Of God is Eternal

Psalm119:160 New International Version   http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalms+119%3A160&version=NIV

” All your words are true; all your righteous laws are eternal..”

Psalm 19:7
The law of the LORD is perfect, refreshing the soul. The statutes of the LORD are trustworthy, making wise the simple.

Psalm 111:8
They are established for ever and ever, enacted in faithfulness and uprightness.

Psalm 119:89
Your word, LORD, is eternal; it stands firm in the heavens.

Psalm 119:142
Your righteousness is everlasting and your law is true.

Psalm 119:152
Long ago I learned from your statutes that you established them to last forever.

Psalm 119:164
Seven times a day I praise you for your righteous laws.

Psalm 139:17
How precious to me are your thoughts, God! How vast is the sum of them!

Online Source : http://biblehub.com/psalms/119-160.htm

The BIG Questions that every Paulinian should answer is : Who are they TO ABOLISHEDthe Law when God clearly stated that The Law – The Torah is ETERNAL?

ABRAHAM Loves the Laws of God

Genesis 26:5 KJV

Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.

MOSES Loves the Laws of God

Deuteronomy13:4

It is the LORD your God you must follow, and him you must revere. Keep his commands and obey him; serve him and hold fast to him.

Deuteronomy28:15

However, if you do not obey the LORD your God and do not carefully follow all his commands and decrees I am giving you today, all these curses will come on you and overtake you:

Deuteronomy29:31

The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law.

Deuteronomy30:10

if you obey the LORD your God and keep his commands and decrees that are written in this Book of the Law and turn to the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.

David  Loves The Law of God

Psalms 19:7-11 KJV

7  The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple.

8  The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes.

9  The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring forever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether.

10  More to be desired are they than gold, yea,than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb.

11  Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward.

St John – One of The Genuine Disciples of Jesus : Loves The Law Of God
1 John 5:2-3 KJV

2  By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments.

3  For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.

St James – The Just, One of the genuine  Apostles of Jesus : Loves The Law Of God

But whoso looketh into the “PERFECT LAW” of LIBERTY and “CONTINUETH” therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the “WORK,” this man shall be blessed in his “DEED.” JAMES 1:25

I think this will SUFFICE to demonstrate my point that … Loving God is only through KEEPING his COMMANDMENTS and applying the Eternal Laws throughout his lives!

Conclusion : Only Satan HATES the Law of God !

Can you people believe on what you have read? Yes! This Insane Pharisees – Saul/Paul of Tarsus deemed the Eternal Law of God as a CURSED!!!! Now who hate most and love to violate the Laws of God? Satan of Course! But Paul of Tarsus is more evil, treacherous than Satan, Paul even ABOLISHED the Whole Law Of God and proclaim himself ABOVE the Law of God!!!

Paul does what he wants when he wants to do it. God’s wrath doesn’t matter to him because he is ABOVE THE LAW! Consider these verses of Paul:

 

All things are lawful unto me … all things are lawful for me but I will not be brought under the power of “ANY!” 1ST CORINTHIANS 6:12

Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. ROMANS 14: 5

Paul twists the truth and says:

“If you think it is sin then it is sin, but if you think it is good then, “IT IS GOOD!”As long as you believe a thing to be truth, it is truth! So says Paul.

Paul then says:

• For whether we “LIVE” we live unto the Lord; and whether we “DIE,” we die unto the Lord: whether we “LIVE” therefore, or “DIE,” we are the Lord’s. ROMANS 14: 8

Paul / Satan says:

“Forget about the Law because it doesn’t matter what you do! You are going to Heaven whether you follow Him or not because God loves you too much to kill you right?”

Lastly Paul finishes his lies with a ridiculous statement:

• Happy is he that condemns not himself in that thing which he allows. ROMANS 14: 22

If you don’t think about your sins then you won’t feel bad about them. Again this man’s thinking is warped. Neither he nor anyone that follows his new philosophy can do any wrong!

“Hurry, Hurry folks! Step right up and get your “Get out of Hell free” gospel that allows you to sin and still go to Heaven all expenses paid!”

 

Apostle Paul’s Lies and Sexual Perversion EXPOSED!

APOSTLE PAUL’S LIES are EXPOSED!

 The IMPOSTER/APOSTLE

“I HATE THE LAWS OF MOSES!”  

                               

–Paul of Tarsus…

Paul claims that he was a Pharisee or student of the laws of God. This is a lie based on the many ways Paul manipulated and misquoted Old Testament scriptures to fit his own agenda. A Pharisee was a student of students. This means that unlike a normal believer they study the oral and written law to the letter as God originally intended. Yes there were bad Pharisees and Sadducees as well but there are good and bad in every aspect of life right? So how can you condemn a wholegroup of people based on the actions of a few? Jesus gave a command to the Jews that they must obey the Pharisees. This means their knowledge of God’s law was beyond measure and correct. Now enter the Apostle Paul…

My Brothers and Sisters it is a fact that Paul was making an “anti-God“ gospel and used Jesus as his personal scapegoat to avoid following the Laws of Moses.

Paul claimed that he was a zealot for the Mosaic Law but his actions and private letters show us that he was a true wolf in sheep’s clothing.  Open your bibles with me as we see just how opposed Paul is to obeying God’s law.

We see here that Paul was against the Law:

 But now we are DELIVERED from the Law? ROMANS 7:6

 A man is not justified by works of the Law, but by faith in Jesus Christ? GALATIANS 2:16

 For as many as are of the works of the Law are Under the Curse? GALATIANS 3:10

 In that He said “A new covenant He had made the first Old. Now that which Decayeth and wasteth Old is ready to Vanish Away.” HEBREWS 8:13

“BLOTTING OUT” the “HANDWRITING” of “ORDINANCES” that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it “OUT OF THE WAY,” nailing it to his cross. COLOSSIANS 2:14

Now I hope you were reading all of these verses in context. If you did you will understand that these are the true opinions of Paul about the laws of Moses. The reason Paul didn’t like following the laws of Moses is because they hindered Paul’s satanic lifestyle. Being a Roman, Paul was able to see and experience all of the forbidden sexual fruits of his gentile pagan countrymen. The Jewish law says that the Jews are not to learn the ways of the heathen/pagans. (See Jeremiah 10:1).Now to the Jews that have never experienced the wonderful sights of Greece, Rome and the other countries it may have been easy to abstain from participation. However being raised in the pagan city of Tarsus this pagan temptation of Satan was simply too great and Paul couldn’t resist it. In a private letter to one of his Roman friends Paul admits that he knows that he is supposed to follow the Mosaic Law but he is a slave to his sinful desires and sold himself to Satan:

 For we know that the law is spiritual but “I AM CARNAL!” sold under sin. ROMANS 7:14

So as you can see Paul knows the law is spiritual and that he is supposed to follow it totally. Paul then frees himself from condemnation by claiming that it is not his fault because he is only human and that he is a slave to all of his sins! Wow! Have you ever heard such nonsense before? Now I’m sure your minister never showed you that satanic character flaw of Paul did he? Let’s continue…

Earlier Satan, through Paul, attempts to deceive the Jews and convince them to forsake God’s law and follow a new and improved version!

Wherefore, my brethren(Jews) ye also are become “DEAD” to the “LAW” by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to “ANOTHER” even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God. ROMANS 7:4

Paul literally attempts to persuade the Jews and says:

“Don’t worry about obeying God’s law because it is now dead because of Jesus!” We can forget about those laws and we are married to another law which is the law of Christ?”

Listen at Paul’s reasoning why the Jews should now forget about the law:

For when we were in the “flesh” the motions (actions) of sins were which were by the “law” did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death. ROMANS 7:5

So it is this nasty law that is to blame. It is because of those stinky hard to follow laws that exposes our sins to us and brings forth death? Wow! So what do you think Paul’s answer was to fix these ridiculous laws? Let’s see:

But now we are delivered from the “law”, that being “dead” wherein we were held; that we should serve in “NEWNESS” of “spirit” and not in “OLDNESS” of the letter. ROMANS 7:6

Paul’s quick fix is to say that we are now delivered from the law as if the law was purposely enslaving us. That is totally ridiculous! You and I both know that the laws of God do not enslave us; the laws of God are there for correction and to guide us into righteousness so that we can avoid sin.

Next Paul’s hatred towards the law starts to heighten! In verse 7, Paul blames the wicked laws of Moses for exposing his sins!

 …I had not known sin, “but” by the “LAW!” For I had not known“LUST” except the law had said, Thou shalt not “COVET!”ROMANS 7:7

Oh my Gosh! Did you understand what this man just said? Paul says that if it hadn’t been for these stupid laws he wouldn’t be convicted of his sins! Paul says that he would not have known that sexual “LUST” was a sin if it wasn’t for one of those stupid laws that say: “Thou shalt not covet!” The Holy law that Paul is referring to is one of the Ten Commandments:

Thou shalt not “COVET” thy neighbour’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s “WIFE,” or his manservant, or his maidservant, or his ox, or his ass, or anything that is thy neighbour’s. EXODUS 20:17

So as you can see, Paul loved having lustful unclean pagan sex. This pervert wasn’t going to give up his freakiness just because some old and decrepit laws of Moses said that he should. Sorry folks that’s just not going to happen! We all know that the word “covet” in the text means to take or desire that which belongs to someone else. We have just read in Romans 7:7, where Paul openly admits that he was guilty of this very sin. Now as for Paul’s covetousness, I wonder which man’s wife or maidservant did Paul secretly have sex with? Well I hope it wasn’t the MANSERVANT that he had sex with! That’s just disgusting! Remember, Paul was the one that admitted that he was coveting something, so blame him and not me…

If Paul is guilty of coveting his neighbor’s wife and having sex with her then he is also committing adultery, another sin! This false prophet thinks he can do whatever he wants in the eyesight of God and get away with it. Paul wasn’t the only false prophet that is guilty of this. The bible warned us about false prophets like Paul:

 I have seen also in the prophets of Jerusalem a horrible thing; they commit “ADULTERY” and walk in lies; they strengthen the hands of evildoers, that NONE doth return from his wickedness; they are all of them unto me as “SODOM,and the inhabitants thereof as “GOMORRAH.” For from the Prophets is “PROFANESS” gone forth into all the land.JEREMIAH 23:14, 15

God speaks clearly in the book of Jeremiah about men such as Paul that commit covetousness and adultery and walk in satanic lies. God says that these men such as Paul give strength to sinners by allowing them to continue their sinful ways. How does Paul do this you ask? He does this by attempting to eliminate the Laws of Moses which teach us correction and how to abstain from sin.

Yes my Brothers and Sisters, Paul’s sexual desires were the catalyst for his satanic new ministry. Paul had a method to his madness! His mission was to eliminate the Laws of Moses. Paul figured that if he can end the law then there is no condemnation for his sins. Oops, I mean for “OUR” sins too. You know I have to include you and I in this too so that we can assist Paul in world domination of the law. Simply put:

·         No Law = No Sin! Or No harm No Foul,

·         Live and let Live? Or Sin and let Sin!

·         Make sinful pagan love, not Laws!

·         What’s done in Jerusalem stays in Jerusalem!Paul/Satan 3:16

Let’s get back to the chapter…

 But sin, taking occasion by the “COMMANDMENT” wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For “WITHOUT” the “LAW” sin was “DEAD!” ROMANS 7:8

Paul says that it is because of the existence of these nasty commandments that showed all manner of sins that he was guilty of committing. For if there was NO LAW, then there is NO SIN! Wow! How can you argue with Paul when he is admitting the truth about his true nature? Remember, Paul never intended for you to learn these dark things about him because these were private letters. Paul is now steaming and starts to reflect on his past sexual exploits and says:

 For I was “ALIVE WITHOUT THE LAW ONCE!” but when the commandment came, sin revived and “I DIED!” ROMANS 7:9

Poor Paul! He is so sad now and Paul says in retrospect:

I used to be alive and fancy free without these stupid Laws of Moses! I had covetousness, adulterous affairs, my group sex, my bi-sexual escapades and pagan sex with farm animals! But once I found out about the commandments and they exposed what I was doing was wrong. I literally died inside!  Paul/Satan 3:16

Now verse seven also proves Paul was not a Pharisee at all! Pay close attention to what Paul just admitted. Paul says:

“For I was “ALIVE WITHOUT THE LAW ONCE!” ROMANS 7:9

 Paul says I was “alive” without the law! Let me say that again for those of you who didn’t catch Paul’s statement.

“I was “ALIVE” without the law once.” 

So Paul believes that God’s laws stopped him from being alive. Can you believe what you have just heard? What kind of man believes God’s laws stops us from being alive? These are the words of Satan! Paul is a deceiver and a false prophet! Now you have learned the whole truth! Now you can see for yourself that Paul was never a Pharisee or student of the law. The Commandments were here long before Paul was born and long before he discovered pagan sex. So he could only mean that he didn’t know about the Mosaic laws until someone such as Jesus’ true Disciples attempted to teach him about the Laws of Moses. All Pharisees and Sadducees knew the laws of Moses intensely! Paul, based on his own admission, apparently did not originally know about these laws! Now compare what Paul is saying in all of the connecting scriptures below.

 …I had not known sin, “but” by the “LAW!” For I had not known“LUST” except the law had said, Thou shalt not “COVET!”ROMANS 7:7

But sin, taking occasion by the “COMMANDMENT” wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For “WITHOUT” the “LAW” sin was “DEAD!” ROMANS 7:8

…but when the commandment came sin revived and “I DIED!”ROMANS 7:9

These three verses are so amazing aren’t they? Paul hoped you and I would never hear any of these words. However, we have his personal letters now don’t we, and they are revealing his hidden satanic side to us!

So Paul boasts to us that before he ever learned about these terrible laws,

1.    “Lust” was a very acceptable practice that he enjoyed.

2.    “Without” the law there is  “no sin.”

3.    When he gained knowledge of the commandments then he felt as if he had “died.”

Have you ever heard of such a thing before? I know my pastor never mentioned any of this in our church. So after he learned about the law, Paul thinks he is now dead. The law has come only to “killed” Paul’s fun! What a shame! So when did the commandments “come” to Paul? As you can see it definitely wasn’t when Paul was an alleged Pharisee! Paul is a liar! Now you know the whole truth! In the next verses you will see that Paul knew that he was supposed to obey the law but admits that they are unacceptable to him:

And the commandment which was ordained to LIFE, I found to be unto death. ROMANS 7:10

TRANSLATION: Even though it is the commandments that give us Eternal life,  I “FIND” them to be too hard and bring me closer to death. This also proves that the original followers of Jesus never thought they were freed from the law. They knew that it was the law that gave them eternal life just like Paul also admitted. What does the bible have to say about a man, such as Paul, who openly boasts about the evil desires of his heart?

 For the wicked boasteth of his heart’s desire, and blesseth the covetous, whom the Lord abhorreth. PSALMS 10:3

Compare the Psalms verse above to Paul’s boasting about his heart’s desire and love for his own lustfulness and covetousness:

 …I had not known sin, “but” by the “LAW!” For I had not known“LUST” except the law had said, Thou shalt not “COVET!”ROMANS 7:7

Totally amazing isn’t it? Now you know the truth…

Now listen to more admission of the real truth concerning the Laws of Moses by Paul:

 Wherefore the “LAW” is HOLY, and the commandment HOLY, and JUST, and GOOD! ROMANS 7:12

This admission of Paul concerning the law is really self-explanatory don’t you agree?Next Paul wonders if the laws were given to personally condemn him alone of his sexual desires and all of the things that he loves the most:

Was then that which is good (SEXUALLY) made death unto me? God forbid. But “sin,” that it might “APPEAR” sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful. ROMANS 7:13

TRANSLATION:

Were the Good sexual things that I used to do harmful to me unto death? No, God forbid. It was “sin” or should I say sinful men who didn’t like what I was doing, they did this! They gave me those NASTY commandments to make me look bad so that the things that I do might “APPEAR” exceedingly sinful to others, and to condemn me to death!

As you can see Paul has no morality. Again Paul knows and also admits that he should follow the law. Paul goes on to admit that he will never accept the power of any of these laws!

All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. 1^st Corinthians 6:12 

All things are lawful but all laws aren’t for him. Paul adamantly refuses to worship God the way Jesus told us to which is inspirit and in truth! You have to admit, this devil Paul is amazing and defiant isn’t he? Listen to Paul twist the truth in this next verse:

 Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. ROMANS 14:5 

Paul tries to convince the people and says:  If you think it is sin in your own mind then it is sin, but if you think in your own mind that what you are doing is a good thing, then, “IT IS GOOD!” As long as you believe a thing to be truth, it is truth!

The truth is what you want it to be! So says Paul. Satan may have to watch out because Paul is doing a better job of deceiving the people than he is! Let’s finish up the last of chapter seven…

In verse 15, Paul gives excuses as to why he chooses to sin:

For we know that the law is spiritual but “I AM CARNAL!”sold under sin. ROMANS 7:14

PAUL SAYS:

“Yes I know that God’s law is holy and the things that I am doing are not allowed. However, I am only a man and I am a slave to my sexual desires!”

Paul refuses to turn to God and change from his wicked ways. The bible speaks about Paul’s unwillingness to repent and turn back to God:

 The wicked, through the pride of his countenance, (arrogance) will not seek after God: God is not in all his thoughts. PSALMS 10:4

So as you can see, even though Paul knew that God’s law was spiritual, he arrogantly says that He is: “carnal” and that he is “sold” under sin. Maybe Paul should say that he:

“Sold” his “soul” to the devil!

Now knowing the law, how does Paul feel after he gives in to his lusts?

 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. ROMANS 7:16 Revised Standard

Are you saying then that it is not a sin to give in to your sexual desires Paul?

If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. Romans 7:16, 17 Living Bible

For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. Romans 7:18

TRANSLATION:

“Just in case I do give in and do the things that I shouldn’t its okay and good still! Why is that you ask? Because it is not me Paul that is doing but the devil took over me and dwells in me! So I still come out smelling like a rose…”Paul/Satan 3:16

Paul wants our pity in the verses above. Paul claims that he is really a good guy and has the desire/will to follow the law, but for whatever reason he just can’t seem to find a way to control his sexual addiction and lustful ways. What does the bible have to say about Paul’s answers?

He hath said in his heart, I shall not be moved: for I shall never be in adversity. His mouth is full of cursing and deceit and Fraud: under his tongue is mischief and vanity. PSALMS 10:6, 7

Wow, who knew all of these things would apply to one of the most quoted false writers of the New Testament gospels? Paul definitely knew that his deceitful words and actions that he taught to the Gentiles were wrong in the eyesight of God. So what about doing good things that honor God Paul? Which one do you choose to do, good or evil?

For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. Romans 7:19

So as you can see Paul admits that he chooses evil over good. So what does Paul’s leading opponent James have to say about Paul’s choices?

JAMES SAYS:

Therefore to HIM that knoweth to do (GOOD), and doeth it (NOT), to him it is SIN. JAMES 4:17

James says that Paul is wrong! James says that if Paul knows that he is doing evil and continues his sexual acts then he is definitely a sinner! Thanks for your help James…

SEXUAL PERVERSION is Paul’s sin of Choice!

For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. Romans 7:22. 23

Paul gives a hypocritical speech claiming that He really loves God down inside but another satanic law that controls his members in other words his: “PENIS/GENITALS” is at war with his mind! Amazing isn’t it?

Wretched man that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death? Romans 7:24

Paul then asks:

 “Who can I use as a scapegoat to free me from the Laws of Moses?” Guess who Icon Paul decided to use?

I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the“MIND” I myself serve the law of God; but with the “FLESH”the law of sin. Romans 7:25

As you can see Paul then uses Jesus as a scapegoat for His sins. So according to Paul he can have his cake and eat it too.

Paul believes that it’s okay to be a hypocrite and serve the law of God with his Mind but with his “FLESH/PENIS” he will continue to serve the immoral laws of sin! Wow! This is amazing! So again, what does the bible have to say about Paul’s openly disobedience to God?

Wherefore doth the wicked contemn God? he hath said in his heart, Thou wilt not require it. PSALMS 10:13

So what do you think about Paul now hmm? Paul never believed in following God or following the words of Jesus either. Don’t forget; these letters were not meant to be seen by you, me or any of Paul’s potential converts either. These are letters that he wrote to his friends where he was venting his mental frustrations!

By keeping up the false appearance of an upstanding Apostle Paul was able to infiltrate the ranks of the true Disciples of Jesus and destroy them with the help of his Greco-Roman slave masters! Now that you know what to look for in Paul’s writings you will see just how many times this man single handedly attempted to destroy the Laws of Moses for his own gain. In the next part of this expose’ we will see just how much Paul hated the Disciples of Jesus and how he went above the call of duty to make sure that none of his followers would listen to their original and true gospels of Jesus. I hope this simple exposition has helped you to see the spiritual light of God. Shalom/Salaam…
———————————

 The IMPOSTER/APOSTLE

“THE FALSE PROPHET COMETH SOON!”   [ Matthew 24:4-5; 11; 23-26, Luke 21:8 ]

In this part we will learn more about the deception of Paul. We are about to learn just how far Paul was willing to go to destroy the original message of Jesus and the ministries of His original Disciples. So let’s begin:

In the final days of Jesus’ ministry Jesus warns His Disciples of the events that are about to befall the Jews soon after His death. We all know about Jesus’ warning of wars, rumors of wars, earthquakes, pestilence and so on. The theologians try to hide from us the fact that Jesus’ greatest warning was that Jerusalem would be destroyed and how the Hebrews would wrongfully be accused and persecuted by the rest of the known world for ages to come. Jesus gives the Disciples the real reason for the upcoming calamity:

For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. MATTHEW 24:5

Now I believe the “In my name” part of the verse is added to change Jesus’ initial meaning of the statement. Remember earlier in Chapter 16 Peter made the assumption that Jesus was the Messiah. Jesus quickly rebuked Peter for those words and gave all of the Disciples a non changing commandment to never say that He was Jesus the Messiah to any other man:

But whom say ye that I am? And PETER answereth and saith unto him, Thou art the Christ. And HE CHARGED THEM that they should tell “NO MAN” OF HIM. MARK 8:28-30

Then CHARGED (HE) His DISCIPLES that they should tell NO MAN that HE was JESUS the MESSIAH.” MATTHEW 16:20

Theologians do not want you to see past their deception and understand why Jesus is commanding the Disciples not to tell anyone that He was the Messiah. Before the Greco-Roman Church stole and edited the gospels Jesus was known as the Jewish Messiah. So let’s go back to Matthew 24…

 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. MATTHEW 24:5

From the earlier corrections of Jesus I believe the original verse stated:

(Edited verse theory)

Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come saying, I JESUS WAS THE Christ; and shall deceive many. MATTHEW 24:4, 5

This warning was not initially for the rest of us. This original warning is specifically to Jesus’ Disciples and followers at that particular time. Jesus has already told the Disciples that He was not the Messiah in chapter 16. Now Jesus is warning the Disciples that after his death others will come upon the scene and start making the claim that He was the messiah. Jesus warns the Disciples that this false prophet will deceive many people!

Then if any “MAN” shall say unto you,(the Disciples) Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. For there shall arise false Christ’s, and false prophets, and shall show GREAT SIGNS and WONDERS insomuch that, if it “WERE” possible, they shall deceive the very “ELECT.” Behold, I have told you before. MATTHEW 24:23-25

I really don’t think you are grasping what Jesus is saying in these verses. The false prophet that Jesus is talking about is not a far futuristic prophet. Jesus is telling the Disciples that they will get a chance to meet this man personally! Yes during their lifetime! Lastly, Jesus tells the Disciples that this false prophet that they will encounter will have just as much power as they do.

The FALSE PROPHET CAN DO MIRACLES TOO!!

He will be able to heal the sick, raise the dead, and possibly feed many people with a few fish and loaves of bread and other miraculous things. Jesus warns the Disciples that the false prophet may perform miracles that are even better than theirs! The miracles will be so spectacular that if it were possible the false prophet will almost get away with deceiving the whole Jewish Elect or chosen people of God! To make that He has the Disciples full attention,

Jesus with a forceful voice screams at the Disciples and says:

 “Don’t forget this prophecy! BEHOLD!I have told you before!” MATTHEW 24:25

Lastly, Jesus ends the prophecy with the following warning:

 Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, He is in the desert; go not forth: behold, He is in the SECRET chambers;BELIEVE HIM NOT! MATTHEW 24:26

Jesus taught the Disciples the truth! Jesus tells James and the other Disciples that if another man comes along and tells them that God is in Secret places or that Jesus spoke to him in a vision with a different message than He has taught the Disciples, they are NOT to believe this man! The Disciples are prepared now! Now enter that false prophet, the Apostle Paul…

PAUL’S CONVERSION LIE!

Paul wants us to believe that Jesus allegedly called Him to the ministry. However, when you read and compare the words of Paul against the words of Jesus and the four gospels you will begin to see that Paul’s ministry is very contradictory to that of Jesus and His original Disciples. So is this story about his conversion just a lie? I believe that it is because of two major contradictory stories written about the alleged visions of Paul. First let’s look at the events surrounding the initial conversion on the Damascus road.

Now shortly after setting out to continue his evil work in Damascus, Paul is supposed to have “seen Jesus on the way” and accepted Christianity after becoming a legend in his persecution of them. There are many other holes in the story of Paul’s alleged “conversion.”

WHO HEARD THE VOICE?

LUKE SAYS:

 And the men which journeyed with him (Paul) stood speechless, HEARING a VOICE but “SEEING” no man. ACTS 9:7

Luke claims the men were actually able to hear Jesus voice but could not see Jesus. Paul says Luke’s story is totally wrong:

 And they that were with me “SAW” indeed the “LIGHT,” and were afraid; but they HEARD NOT the voice of him that spake to me. ACTS 22:9

Paul gives a sworn testimony that the men saw the light indeed! Paul says the men never heard Jesus’ voice at all.

These two stories whether they were written by Luke & Paul or later edited by the Catholic Church definitely contradict each other! So which is it?

Did these men see the light or hear the voice or vice versa? I don’t believe either story at all. I believe that this story is added so that you and I will believe the conversion story is true based on the supposed testimony of other witnesses in attendance. Have you noticed that there are none of these men available to give a testimonial to these events?

Question: In Acts 9:3, Paul claims:

1.    He had SEEN a LIGHT FROM HEAVEN?

2.    He claim that Jesus SPOKE to Him and gave Him a COMMAND?

3.    Paul claims OTHERS who SAW THE LIGHT could CONFIRM THIS?

It seems as though the Old Testament writers were prepared for Paul’s false visions and wrote a prophecy to warn future generations not to listen to false divinations and dreams:

Woe unto foolish prophets (PAUL)that follow their OWN spirit,and have SEEN NOTHING! They have seen vanity and “LYING” divination saying the LORD saith. EZEKIEL 13:3, 6,

 The LORD hath NOT SENT THEM: and they have made OTHERS to hope that they would CONFIRM the word. EZEKIEL 13:3, 6, 7

WOW, How is it that the same words Paul uses are already spoken against this liar?As you see just like Jesus warned the Disciples about the false prophet, God also warned the Jews about men such as Paul who claim to see visions. God says that, Paul “HEARS” nothing from Him or Jesus. Paul attempted to use the other men to confirm his false words. What is the conclusion? Paul never heard the voice of Jesus on the Damascus Road!

Did Paul Preach with the Disciples after his conversion?

Before we start, let me first show you another ridiculous story Luke and Paul invent concerning an alleged Disciple of Jesus by the name of Ananias.

Now according to Luke’s words in Acts 9:10-17 and Paul’s words in Acts 22:12 Jesus is alleged to have sent this man to heal Paul’s blindness. Now there is something wrong with this picture, they forgot to delete the following scripture from the bible about the character of Ananias that says:

And one Ananias, a devout man according to the LAW, having a good report of all the Jews which dwelt there. ACTS 22:12

Now think about something? Both Luke and Paul claim that Ananias was a very devout Hebrew. The word devout means:

Dedicated, devoted and committed.

So Ananias was committed to following the Laws of Moses. The very same Laws of Moses that Paul is attempting to destroy! Huh?

Ask yourself this question:

 “If Ananias is so well respected by “ALL” the Jews for committing himself to obeying every inch of the Laws of Moses why would he be sent to a man that does not want to obey these laws?

As you can see that makes absolutely no sense at all! Let’s continue:

 …then was Saul certain days with the disciples which were at Damascus. And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God. ACTS 9:19, 20

Luke says that after this Disciple Ananias allegedly healed Paul’s blindness, Paul straightway or immediately started preaching with Ananias and the other Disciples of Jesus’ original ministry that Jesus was the Messiah and the son of God. LIAR!!!!Now if Ananias was such a devout Jew would he preach that we are under “grace” and not the LAW as Paul did? Of course not!This is all a ridiculous lie that the Greco-Roman Churches never expected us to notice or think about. The bible says all the Jews loved the Disciple Ananias. Again, it says “ALL!”

Now if Ananias was preaching that Jesus was the Messiah and literal son of God in the Jewish synagogues: Do you really think “ALL” of the Jews would really be singing Ananias’ praise?

Of course not!The Jews would have attacked Ananias like they tried to kill the false prophet Paul. As you can see no Jewish person seemed to have a problem with Ananias preaching the true message of Jesus.The reason for this was that Jesus’ original message was about the love of YHWH, repentance and turning back to YHWH the only God of heaven. This proves just how far the New Testament false writers were willing to go to deceive us all! Stop letting the money hungry prosperity preachers and churches think for you! Give God just a little bit of effort in your studies good grief! Now you know the truth…

So after Paul’s alleged conversion did he immediately preach with Jesus’ disciples? Well from we have uncovered above, apparently not. However there are more scriptures than those above that prove the Luke and Paul cannot get their stories correct.

Luke tells us in the book of Acts 9 that after Paul’s alleged conversion He immediately joined the original Disciples in Damascus in and out of Damascus and all of Judaea. Let’s go to the FIRST stories in Acts about this conversion:

And when he (Paul) had received meat, he was strengthened then was Saul certain days with the disciples which were at Damascus.

And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God. ACTS 9:19, 20

So according to Luke’s story, Paul doesn’t waste anytime at all and starts preaching side by side with some of Jesus’ Disciples right in Damascus.

We are let to believe that Paul supposedly confounds the Jews in the synagogues and built up such a strong reputation through his bold preaching that confounds the Jews of Damascus. Now in Acts Luke writes from the view of Paul on the same subject:

Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision: But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judaea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance. ACTS 26:19-21

Although Luke is supposedly the writer of Acts, we see that it is PAUL that is speaking to King Agrippa. Paul says that he preached to the people of Damascus and Jerusalem and throughout ALL the coasts of JUDAEA. Now remember all of those places that you’ve just heard about because.

Because the TRUTH is about to expose the LIES!!Paul now admits that he was really lying and he contradicts the book of Acts and says that he never preached in those areas at all!

But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb, and called me by his grace, To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood: Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. GALATIANS 1:15-17

LIAR, LIAR, SOUL’S ON FIRE!!!Paul lets us know the follow truths and contradictions in Galatians 1:15-17:

1. He did not straightway preach with the Disciples in Damascus as said in Acts 9:19
2. He never went to Jerusalem or throughout all the coasts of Judaea preaching with any of the Disciples of Jesus’ original ministry like he told king Agrippa in Acts 26:20
3. Instead he immediately chose not to associate himself with the Disciples and goes immediately to Arabia! Galatians 1:17.

So as you can see there is so much falsehood going on between the writers of Acts and Galatians!

 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days. But OTHER of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord’s brother. GALATIANS 1:18, 19

According to Paul he continues testifying that the stories in the book of Acts are incorrect. Paul says that he did not immediately preach in Jerusalem. Paul says that he instead went immediately to Arabia and it took him over three years before he decided to go up to Jerusalem.·         Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I LIE NOT. GALATIANS 1:18

Paul swears to the Galatians with a solemn oath in front of the eyes of God that this version is the total truth.

Afterwards I came into the regions of Syria and Cilicia; and was UNKNOWN BY FACE unto the churches of JUDAEA which were in Christ: But they had heard only, that he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed. GALATIANS 1:21-23

If Paul is admitting that the churches of Jerusalem and Judaea had never seen his face then why would we believe the words in the book of Acts where Paul is claiming that the not only seen his face but supposedly heard him preach powerful messages of Jesus as the messiah and the son of God?

Now there is so much more that I could show you on this chapter but we have to stop here for a lack of space. Now to recap just a few things that we have learned:

WOW! So now we see that SOMEONE IS LIEING! Now Paul himself says that He was lying is his version in Acts! He tells us:

1.)   “Immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood.” This means that He was never blind or received His site from Ananias.

2.)   “Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me.” Meaning He never heard the true message that the real Jesus spent three long years teaching the true Disciples.

3.)   “I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus.” Meaning that He didn’t immediately join forces with Jesus’ real Disciples and straightway start teaching the masses that Jesus was the Messiah or the son of God.

4.)   “Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.” Meaning He visited only the weakest of the Disciples to get a feel of the opposition.

5.)   “But OTHER of the APOSTLES saw I none, save James the Lord’s brother.” He had to know who the strongest link was, know your enemy!

6.)   “The things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I LIE NOT.”

7.)   “Was UNKNOWN by face unto the churches of JUDAEA.”

8.)   “But they had HEARD only.”

Now Paul’s give a solemn oath to GOD: “Now concerning the things which I write to you, indeed, before God I do not lie,” which makes his letter a SWORN TESTIMONY! To the story in Acts, this contradiction is major!

If Paul says: I never did any of the things that Luke claims, which version of these stories are we supposed to believe? Can we even remotely claim God had a hand in adding either of these two writings into the bible? No! This lets us know that SATAN’S hand is involved in the writing of the New Testament Gospels.Paul himself proudly proclaims that he has no need of learning from any human being, not even from Jesus’ true Disciples. Paul’s knowledge is completely independent and contradictory to that of the original Disciples. Paul doesn’t want their knowledge and feels that all he needs is his visions:

 But I certify you, brethren that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neitherreceived it of man, neither was I taught [it], but by the revelation of Jesus Christ. GALATIANS 1:11, 12

If Paul is telling the truth, why is his gospel message that He allegedly received from JESUS different from the gospels of the original Disciples? The answer is simple, Jesus and YHWH never spoke to Paul! Paul is speaking after his own heart and from his father Satan. Paul was unwilling to receive anything from the true Disciples.

In not wanting to learn the true Gospel of Jesus, Paul was never able to use the words of Jesus as proof to substantiate his false doctrine. It is next to impossible to find Paul quoting scriptures that coincide with words that Jesus spoke to the multitudes of believers that followed Him. When pressed for knowledge concerning the Kingdom of God Paul always refers to his own personal philosophy based upon “visions” he claims to be receiving from the so-called Holy Ghost.When Paul’s gospels would contradict those of Jesus’ Disciples on subjects such as the Law, marriage, or sinfulness, Paul could not claim to have first hand knowledge of the teachings of Jesus. Since everyone knew that Paul never met Jesus, he found it necessary to always resort to extensive philosophical rhetoric to sidestep their questions.Paul then would claim that Jesus and the Holy Ghost were “inspiring” his philosophy. Yes, all ridiculous crap if you ask me! Through His warped gospels Paul can claim to love God and also continue to do his own will as well. This is the very teaching of all of Christianity to this very day. We go to church, speak in these satanic babble tongues, we sing songs on Sundays and then go and smoke, drink and live ungodly worldly lifestyles on Mondays.

What does God have to say about a Man who attempts to turn evil things into good in the sight of the Lord?

Thy tongue deviseth mischiefs; like a sharp razor, working deceitfully. Thou lovest EVIL more than GOOD and “LYING” rather than to speakrighteousness. Selah. Thou lovest all devouringwords, O thou deceitful tongue. PSALMS 52:2-4

YES Paul admits that he loves Evil more than Good. Paul uses devouring words or fancy speeches with a deceitfultongue trying to persuade the Jews to turn away from their only God and follow another gospel. This man is a liar!

YE have wearied the LORD with your words. Yet ye say, wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, every one that doeth (EVIL) IS GOOD in the SIGHT of the LORD, and he delighteth in them; or, where is the God of judgment? MALACHI 2:17

God is not pleased with false prophets like Paul who tell us that evil things are now very good in God’s sight.

After all has been said in this chapter, there is no one that can say that we were twisting these verses just to prove a point. We are not taught by our ministers to read the bible as it is literally written. We are taught to read one verse here and one verse there so that it will line up with your minister’s sermon. Sadly, when you usually read the entire chapter instead of just the one verse your ministers give us, we notice that it really doesn’t line up with his sermons. Satan and the Greco-Roman Churches want to keep us ignorant to Jesus’ true gospel. If they can keep us entertained, then we will continue to be ignorant and separated from God.

Paul did what he wanted when He wanted to do it. God’s wrath doesn’t matter to Him because He is ABOVE THE LAW!

Paul claims that he has been singled out from among all of mankind to receive visions denied to all the other Disciples and to have been allowed through this inspiration to gain new converts “by all means.” He also would claim “All things are lawful unto me.”

So as you can see according to Paul what ever He decided to do it was okay and lawful for HIM to do! This means if Paul decides to lie, steal, cheat, fornicate, or whatever EVIL his mind can conceive it is according to Paul “LAWFUL” under His so-called “Laws of Christ.”

In the Part 1 we have learned so much about the true character of Paul. For some of you this knowledge may be too much to handle all at one time. Believe me I do understand what you are going through. I know that after 10,20 or 50 years of being in your churches you now find out that most of it was all a lie. So to you that need a break, go ahead and take some time and meditate and pray. God will comfort your hearts. When you are able to continue just pick up this book along with the bible and resume your studies.

I pray that this exposition has also helped you see the light through the satanic light written in the edited New Testament books. God bless you in your continual spiritual journey. Shalom…
—————–

“I HATE THE REAL DISCIPLES! Let’s kill them!” Paul of Tarsus…

Now that is quite a catchy and strong quote above isn’t it? Do I really expect you to believe that Paul hated Jesus’ original Disciples and their ministry so much that he wanted to do them harm? My answer to your question is, yes I expect you to believe it. Not because I am saying so but because the bible shows us that this is so.If at this point I have already offended you then you need to stop reading now because your mind is not opened to see anything other than your own views. So don’t continue to waste your time… To the rest of you let’s find out if the bible actually reveals the dissention between Paul and the true Disciples.

In Part 2 we learned that Jesus warned His Disciples that they would meet the false prophet after He dies. Jesus told them that this false prophet will have just as much spiritual power as they will have. The false prophet will be able to heal the sick and raise the dead. Just like Superman has Lex Luthor as his nemesis, this new false prophet will be the Disciples archenemy or adversary!

The time is now at hand!

Jesus has died and the true Disciples are devoutly carrying on His mission of repentance, love and returning to the obedience of the Laws of Moses. We have been falsely told that the Jews turned their backs on Jesus however, this not the case. We learn that thousands upon thousands of Jews listen to the Disciples.The Jews all start to turn away from the false gods of Greece and the Roman Empire in masses (See: Acts 21:20).  The Greeks and Romans are nervous because they have placed 3 evil puppet kings on the throne in Israel.

·         King Herod the Great, (c. 74-4 BC) King Herod Antipas, (20 BC- AD 40) and King Herod Agrippa II (AD 27-100)

They Greeks and the Roman Empire and churches have also paid a considerable amount of money to corrupt the hierarchy of the Jewish Council. So many of the leaders are completely in their pockets and their motives are from a GREED perspective.  However, now, because of the Disciples preaching the true message of YHWH GOD that they received from their teacher/rabbi/lord Jesus, the knowledge of God is now increasing among the people.With this knowledge, civil unrest is also increasing. The High Council is corrupt and the people are rebelling against them as they once did when they went to John the Baptist for the truth’ which caused the finances to dwindle. The High Council realize something has to be done immediately before this powder keg explodes.

The Jewish Council’s powers were limited by the Laws of Moses. This is why they were never allowed to kill Jesus.The corrupt High Council was given more power to supersede the Laws of Moses by Herod and Rome.In stealth, the Jewish Council hired a vigilante mob and gave the mob “police powers.”

Their mission is to seek out and kill the Disciple leaders of the ministry as they did when they killed Stephen in Acts 7:58, 59. The mob used tactics of false accusations, torture and death as intimidation hoping this would stop the rest of the Jews from following Jesus’ original message!

These tactics didn’t work at all! They forgot that these people were proud descendants of Jews that were used to oppression! These Jews are the offspring of Jews that were delivered from the hands of Egypt, Assyria and Babylon! They cannot be stopped that easily. Jesus’ message grows like an out of control wildfire! The corrupt council’s methods have failed! The Greeks and Romans now have to somehow step in to control the council’s mess.

This growing ministry of the Disciples has to be stopped at all cost!

The Greeks and Romans knew that if they intervene to stop the Disciples this would only make the Disciples heroes and martyrs to the people. They watched this happen when a simple prophet named Jesus was killed. They were determined not to make that mistake again. The Disciples would have to be destroyed from the inside and it would have to be one of their very own that does it! We are told that Judas Iscariot is allegedly dead. So it would have to be another spy from within the Disciples that destroys the ministry of Jesus. To destroy the ministry from within someone would have to infiltrate the Jews, gain their trust and be able to brain wash one of the original Disciples and convince him to turn against the other Disciples. Enter the Apostle Paul…

In Acts 7:58, Luke introduces us to one of the members of the vigilante mob by the name of Saul who we know as Paul. Saul/Paul admits that he was the designated coat watcher of the mob as they viciously attacked and killed Stephen. Saul/Paul wasn’t an innocent bystander at all. Paul admits that he took part in much of these crimes against Jesus’ original Disciples and that he took great pleasure in his crimes. He also admits that as the head of these vigilantes Paul was paid a considerable amount of wealth:

 For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews’religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it: And profited in the Jews’ religion above many my equals in mine own NATION, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers. GALATIANS 1-13, 14

Wow! Notice what Paul actually admits in these two verses:

1.      Paul speaks of the “JEWS” religion as if it wasn’t a religion he ever served.

2.      He admits that he always knew that he was persecuting and “destroying” Jesus’ message ministry concerning the true “church of God.”

3.      Paul admits that he “profited” financially more than any of his “EQUALS” or other Jews in his “OWN NATION that chose to be followers of the original traditions of their forefathers!

Just because you may be an alleged Hebrew by birth does not mean you love your own people or that you love their God either. Judaism was never Paul’s religion. As you can now see, Paul lied to the Jews. He never studied traditional Hebrew/Judaic studies under Gamaliel as told to us in Acts 22:3.

As we said above, Paul’s vigilante mob’s heinous tactics did not succeed at all. The Hebrews/Jews grew stronger in their knowledge and faith in YHWH because of the ministry of Jesus and the Disciples. The Jews stopped giving money, tithes and tribute to the corrupt Jewish Council. With no money or food supplies coming in to pay their hired goons, the council was forced to disband their goon squads. These satanic mercenaries now have to find other sources of employment. This is not acceptable to Saul/Paul.

In Galatians 1:13,14 Paul was just boasting to us about how he was better than his equals or other Jews in his own nation that loved the Laws of God. He does not want to go back a broken and defeated man. Paul is presented a new mission by the satanic Greeks and Romans which could be a financial gold mine if he plays it correctly! Although he is raised as an assimilated Greek citizen the Greco-Romans know that Paul has knowledge of the Hebrew language. Paul is to blend into normal Jewish culture and then satanically infiltrate the original Disciples and turn one of the Disciples against the others. We in America and in Europe have used these tactics for centuries. Destroy your enemies by bribing one of their own brothers to do your dirty work. I’m sure African descendants know exactly what I’m talking about…

A perfect plan is implemented by the sons of Satan. The Hebrew people are naturally a very gullible and forgiving nation. Paul and his Greco-Roman friends devise a plan that leads the Jews to believe that Paul has suddenly and miraculously converted to the ministry of Jesus! Amazing and clever isn’t it? The Jews in Jerusalem are not going to just openly believe this devil’s story. As any good spy would, Paul has to start slowly and build up his reputation among the Jews in his own country first and then work his way up the ladder to do the damage to the original Disciples…

Paul attempts to infiltrate the Disciples.

Was Paul one of the original Disciples? Did Paul ever see Jesus in the flesh? No. Jesus spent three long hard years with His Disciples, his own Brothers such as James and Jude and also with friends whom He totally trusted. His family and friends grew to understand his mission and parables. Did you the reader ever find it odd that Jesus would return unexpectedly and speak to Paul? If Jesus was so opened to speak from heaven why wouldn’t he tell his original Disciples that He was commissioning Paul into the ministry?

The Disciples were terrified of Paul and the other hired mercenaries of the High Council. Wouldn’t you think at some point and time that Jesus would have spoken to at least one of the Disciples and tell them that He has a new champion for the spiritual mission? Especially a supposed champion who has written more than half of the New Testament based only on a alleged voice? If Jesus would have actually spoken to Paul, I really don’t think Jesus would have left His Disciples clueless about Paul do you? As you can see these are all written satanic lies of the Greco-Roman churches.

Not being able to stop the Jews from listening to the teachings of Jesus about returning to the one true God of heaven, and not being able to destroy the followers’ zeal for YHWH, Paul must go undercover and infiltrate this return movement and stop it at all cost! Even though Paul was an ethnic Jew, Paul was raised as a citizen of the country Greece. The Grecian lifestyle was all Paul really knew and that is where his loyalties were. That is sort of understandable. If you were an ethnic German born in America your loyalties are normally towards your birthplace.

Being Greek Paul must attempt to live all aspects of life like a regular Jewish citizen. He must pretend to love the traditions of his ancestors so that he will not look out of place in the Jewish towns. Paul later wrote about this deceptive infiltration to his friends in Corinth and said:

To the Jews I became as a (JEW), in order to win Jews; to those under the law I became as one under the LAW–-THOUGH (not being)myself under the law–that I might win those under the law. 1^st CORINTHIANS 9:20

Paul is indeed admitting the truth and says out of his own mouth that he was a satanic fraud and only pretended to be a“JEW” so that he could “secretly“ infiltrate and win over the original Jews! Wow! What a devil!

Now Paul wasn’t attempting to admit this fact to you and me at all. This was a private letter to one of his Roman friends in the town of Corinth. Did you understand that fact? I’ll say it again. This was a “PRIVATE” letter. The reason Paul is so open and honest about his devious plan is because you and I were never meant to know this truthful information. Total Deception here folks!  Paul says his hidden agenda was to pretend to be a follower of Jesus

Paul knew at some point and time that he may need some additional help. So he also attempted to gain allies who didn’t necessarily believe in the laws of Moses to assist him in his mission:

To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law. 1^st CORINTHIANS 9:21

Paul tells us: “To those outside the law I BECAME as one OUTSIDE the law, meaning that “To those who were sinners I Paul myself, became a sinner, I became an Adulterer, I became a Liar, I became a Murderer, I became a Fornicator, I Became an Idolater, I became a Drunkard, I became Covetous.Not being without law toward God but under the law of Christ so that I might infiltrate and win those outside the law.

Now you and I both know that neither Jesus nor the Disciples ever preached a doctrine known as the: “Laws of Christ.” This man Paul is a liar!

Let’s move on…

In the foreign countries Paul’s notoriety is supposedly growing now. Even though it is an act Paul zealously continues his ministry that Jesus was the messiah the son of God and that he is about to come back to the earth to take his followers to heaven. That was really the extent of Paul’s whole gospel message because that is all Paul says that he really knew.

And I brethren, when I came to you, came not with Excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God. For (I) determined not to (KNOW) ANYTHING among you, save JESUS CHRIST, and Him crucified. 1^st CORINTHIANS 2:1, 2

So as you can see apparently this proves my point that Paul’s Damascus Road story from my last chapter was truly a lie. Paul just openly admitted that he was never taught by Jesus in his vision and he was not taught by the Disciple Ananias either as to what Jesus’ true message ministry really was! So there you have it! Admission of lies! Let’s continue…

As we said Paul’s notoriety as a fiery preacher is growing rapidly in the foreign gentile countries. Training camp is now over and it is now time to move up to the big leagues! Paul has to take his show on the road and go to Jerusalem and attempt to win over James, the brother of Jesus, and the rest of true Disciples of Jesus.

THE CONFRONTATION:

The time is here! Paul has just arrived in Jerusalem to face the true Disciples. However there is a problem! Jesus’ true Disciples want nothing to do with Paul.

 And when Saul was come to Jerusalem, he assayed to join himself to the disciples: but they were all afraid of him, and believed not that he was a disciple. ACTS 9:26

Paul wants desperately to join up with Jesus’ original Disciples. They are not willing to meet with him because they have been in hiding from when he was the leader of the mercenary killing squad of the High Council.

Still fearing the wrath of the Jewish Council, the head Disciples are still in hiding. The Disciples are openly preaching the word of God. But to ensure that no once can officially turn them in, the identities of true leaders of the ministry are unknown to most of the people. The Disciples have heard about Paul’s alleged change but they are in fear of him. They have also heard rumors that Paul is still teaching against the Laws of Moses. They have no way of knowing just which stories are correct so they must keep alert and stay fearful of a trap. Paul needs to find a guide or intercessor to bridge the gap between them.

 But Barnabas took him, and brought him to the apostles, and declared unto them how he had seen the Lord in the way, and that he had spoken to him, and how he had preached boldly at Damascus in the name of Jesus. ACTS 9:27 

To the Disciples Barnabas has proven himself as a loyal member of the faith. Because of his word they agree to meet with Paul. The place has to be in the open so that they can have room to escape in case it is a trap. The meeting takes place among the crowds during the Jubilee festival celebration:

 And when we were come to Jerusalem, the brethren (Barnabas) received us gladly. And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and ALL the elders were present. ACTS 21:17-18

Luke claims that it was Barnabas that allegedly welcomes Paul to Jerusalem and assures him that the meeting with the Disciples will take place at the festival. Luke says that James and “all” of the elders were present. Now this may not be true at all because Paul contradicts Luke and says that he only met James at this meeting:

Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him FIFTEEN DAYS! But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord’s brother. GALATIANS 1:18, 19

Something is wrong with these two stories! One or both of these stories are lies and they contradict each other badly! Now either it was Barnabas that introduces Paul to the Disciples or it was Peter? Paul says that he spent 15 days with Peter before the actual meeting!Now how can this be? Shouldn’t Peter also be in hiding with the other Disciples? Yet Paul claims that Peter welcomed him in his home for 15 days! Now that is half of the month! Now tell me: When did Peter and Paul become such friends? Are you also starting to smell something fishy about Peter? We will discuss Peter in a later chapter.

Now just for the sake of argument I would tend to believe Paul’s version that he only saw James at the meeting. I know that if I was the leader of the Disciples I do not think I would be willing to take a chance and expose the rest of the leading members to a possible trap.

So now we have the confrontation at last!

 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry.  And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord… ACTS 21:17-20

James is at least willing to listen to Paul talk about the alleged things that he is doing in the name of God in the Gentile lands. After Paul finishes bragging about his own ministry, James has a few comments of his own:

 And said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many THOUSANDS OF JEWS there are which believe; and they are all ZEALOUS of the LAW. ACTS 21:20

James wants Paul to take notice of all of the people surrounding him at this festival. James tells Paul that all of these thousands in attendance at this festival are all followers of Jesus’ ministry!

(Personal Note): When your unlearned ministers attempt to make you believe that the Jews turned their backs on Jesus by quoting from John 1:11 which says: “He came unto his own, and his own received him not.” You will now understand that John 1:11 is a satanic lie added by the Greco-Roman Churches and purposely added so that we will all hate the Jews.

So again James says tells Paul that all of the people in attendance are followers of Jesus and that they are in love with his Jesus’ original message!

James then reveals something special to Paul. James reveals to Paul and also to you and I that these same thousands of Jews in attendance are all devoted fanatical followers of the Laws of Moses! From this statement we can see that the Disciples did not believe that through Jesus BLOOD they can be SAVED, They believed in following the LAWS OF MOSES as Jesus taught them to observe.After teaching Paul the truth, James has a few questions of his own for Paul about the rumors that he is hearing about Paul’s hidden agendas! Uh oh! It’s about to get hot in here folks! It’s time to put the kids to bed because this conversation is about to get really steamy and juicy!

JAMES asks Paul the hard questions!

With a raised eyebrow, James looks at Paul and says:

And they are informed of thee that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to“FORSAKE”Moses, saying that they ought NOT to“CIRCUMCISE” their children, NEITHER to walk after the “CUSTOMS.”ACTS 21:21

Wow! James didn’t pull any punches or sugar-coat his questions did he? Notice that James is not asking Paul what he is teaching the Gentiles as our ministers have overlooked. James is asking Paul what he is teaching the “JEWS” that live among the Gentile nation.

James hears Paul alleged claims that he has been converted to the ministry. So it is now question and answer time for Paul! It is now time for Paul to either: “Put up or shut up!” James asks Paul, if the rumors are true that he is teaching the Jews that they should forsake the Laws of Moses and also not circumcise their children. The tension mounts! While Paul thinks about how to answer James’ question, let’s skip ahead and see if the rumors are true Did Paul teach against “circumcision” and that Jesus ended the laws of Moses and the “Ordinances?”

 For neither CIRCUMCISION counts for anything nor UNCIRCUMCISION but keeping the commandments of God. 1^ST CORINTHIANS 7:19

According to Paul God’s law of circumcision is stupid and useless? Does Paul teach us that it was Jesus that causes the end of circumcision? Oh yes!

 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be CIRCUMCISED Christ shall profit you nothing.GALATIANS 5:2

As you can see the rumors are correct Paul says above that if the Jews continue circumcising their children then the message of Jesus is of no good to them! Huh? Seeing as he has never heard Jesus’ message at all, how does Paul know any of this? While Paul is still thinking about what to tell James, let’s look at more of Paul’s original doctrine. Did Paul teach against the Laws of Moses? Yes he did:

 For “I TESTIFY” again to every man that is CIRCUMCISED, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.4.  Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are FALLEN FROM GRACE. GALATIANS 5:3, 4

So are we to believe that the Jews have fallen from God’s grace because they continue to obey God’s covenant of circumcision? This man is a liar!

Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to “ORDINANCES.” COLOSSIANS 2:20

Paul asks the question why he should have to follow the “ordinances” of Moses if he believes in Jesus. Why would Paul even ask such a ridiculous question? Where is he getting this stuff from? We know it wasn’t from Jesus or the true Disciples. Lastly, as concerning the end of the Laws of Moses Paul says the following:

“BLOTTING OUT” the Handwriting of “ORDINANCES”that was AGAINST US which was contrary to us, and took it OUT OF THE WAY, nailing it to his cross. COLOSSIANS 2:14

You can see from Paul’s own letters that he openly taught against circumcision. Paul also taught the Jews that when Jesus died on the cross, He allegedly “blotted out” the written Laws of Moses. Paul claims Jesus did this because the laws were all contrary and against us. Wow! What a liar. Now you know the truth! Now let’s return to the confrontation between James and Paul!

(Personal note)The Disciples did not have access to Paul’s private “EPISTLES” like we have today in the verses above.

James is patiently waiting for an answer from Paul about the rumors. There was no way for James to know what you and I know about Paul’s epistles. Other than being in actual attendance and hearing the messages of Paul James has no way of knowing if what the people are accusing Paul of is true.So what is Paul’s answer to the question?

The scriptural verses do not give us Paul’s response to James’ question. However, when reading Acts 21 verses 22 thru 25, you can come to the conclusion that Paul tells James that the rumors are all false. How can we come to that conclusion? Well we can conclude this because if Paul would have confirmed the rumors that he was teaching against the law then James would have known the total truth about Paul’s lies and that he was setting a trap for him and the other Disciples! Could you imagine what James would have done if he knew Paul actually said the following verses?

 For Christ is the “END OF THE LAW” for righteousness to everyone that believeth. ROMANS 10:4

 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are“NOT UNDER THE LAW” but under grace. ROMANS 6:14

Do you think if James would have heard or read the two verses above from Paul that James would think Paul was a man of God? Of course not! James and the other followers of Jesus might have killed Paul on the spot. Since James did not know of verses like the ones above Paul is temporarily safe.

Still unsure about Paul, in Acts 21:22-25 James decides to test Paul’s character and make him prove himself to them and to the other Jews at the festival.  James orders Paul to go into the temple with four new converts of Jesus’ original ministry and perform the sin purification ritual in front of everyone! Now what was James’ reason for making Paul do these rituals? The end of verse 24 tells us the reason and also tells us what Jesus actually taught the true Disciples as well:

 …and all may “know” that those things whereof they were informed of thee, are “NOTHING”; but that thou (PAUL) thyself also walkest orderly, and “KEEPEST THE LAW.” ACTS 21:24

Compare the difference in the doctrines of Paul verses to that of the true Disciples of Jesus. Paul says the law has ended yet James says the law has not ended. Which one of these men should we believe? The one personally taught by Jesus to obey the law or the one who only claims to have seen an imaginary vision of Jesus?

People with common sense will choose James because Jesus told him the truth. However we all know that common sense is really not all that “common” is it? Let’s continue…

James tells Paul that he must do the purification ritual to prove to the people that the rumors about him were lies and that HE/PAUL does walk righteously and KEEPS THE LAW:

Guess what folks? The purification offering includes the ritual of the: “ANIMAL SACRIFICES!” Yes the same ritual that Christians claim Jesus ended! I thought you should know…

Now you and I have already read and know that Paul didn’t keep the law. We’ve already read the scriptures where Paul said that Jesus freed us from such purification rituals of the Mosaic Law right? So if Paul were a true Apostle of Jesus as he claims, Paul was supposed to refuse the order of James to enter into the temple to perform the rituals. If Paul were sincere about serving Jesus’ ministry then Paul was supposed to tell James directly to his face that Jesus freed us from the laws of Moses as he said in Galatians below!

 For “I TESTIFY” again to every man that is CIRCUMCISED, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.4.  Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are FALLEN FROM GRACE. GALATIANS 5:3, 4

Being the coward that he is, Paul does not say any of this to James. So what do you think Paul’s response was when James gave Paul a direct order? Let’s see:

 Then PAUL took the men, and the NEXT DAY purifying HIMSELF with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification until that an OFFERING should be offered for every one of them. ACTS 21:26

The early Jewish Christians continued to do what Jesus instructed them to do, which is to follow the laws of Moses including the following:

1.    Circumcising their sons.

2.     Purification rituals of animal sacrifices in the temples

3.     Keeping the traditions of their fathers.

4.     Some of them even continued to take the Nazarite vow, which was a Mosaic practice of dedicating oneself to God and following strict rules of purity. (See Numbers 6:1-21.)

If Paul’s vision of Jesus was real then his loyalty should have been to Jesus and not with the Disciples. Paul’s obligation to Jesus would be to teach James and the other Disciples this new truth. Paul was supposed to teach them that Jesus has freed them from the rituals under the “LAW” and that we are now under “GRACE” and not under the “Law?” Paul should have used the words that he said in Galatians:

For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. GALATIANS 2:18, 19

In his secret gospels Paul says the following words as concerning obeying the Laws of Moses:

“If I now decide to obey the laws of Moses, the same laws which I Paul have destroyed in the minds of the people, then I have once again made myself a sinner. I will not do that ever again because I am dead to God’s laws!”

Now the above scripture is what Paul taught outside of the ear range of James and the other Disciples. This would be a bold and dynamic statement of faith if Paul would have said these things to James. However, Paul’s true cowardly character comes out instead and Paul ignores his own gospels and does what James commands!Does that make any sense! This proves to us that Paul would do anything to fool the Disciples and the people and get them to trust him.  Paul writes to us and admits he does these very things often:

You shouldn’t be surprised at Paul’s actions because remember, infiltrating the ranks of the Disciples was his initial mission.

 To the Jews I became as a (JEW), in order to win Jews; to those under the law I became as one under the LAW–-THOUGH (not being)myself under the law–that I might win those under the law. 1^st CORINTHIANS 9:20

Paul admits that even though he really does not obey any of the Mosaic Law, he pretended to be a JEW so that he could win them over.

Paul is a deceiver/Satan!  Paul’s only reason for going into the Temple and doing the Laws of Moses was to fool the Disciples. Paul will do or say anything to be accepted by the Jews and by the Disciples…

Now Paul has done as James commanded and performed all of the rituals of the Mosaic Law. So far Paul has successfully hid his true ministry from James and the other disciples. Paul now feels like his mission of infiltrating the ranks of the Disciples is near. Since there was no one around to dispute Paul about the lies in his ministry, Paul feels like he has accomplished his task of successfully convincing James that he is a sincere convert. Paul feels like he is about to be officially embraced by the Disciples until something drastic happens! Unexpected guests!

  And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and laid hands on him.ACTS 21:27

Asian Jews have traveled down to Israel for the great festival. They have heard Paul’s hidden gospels up close! We now have witnesses that can testify against Paul’s lying ministry! Let’s see what they had to say:

Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man { Paul / Saul }, that teacheth all men everywhere against the people, and the LAW, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place. ACTS 21:28

Wow!!!!!!!!!!Paul is now busted!!!!!

Paul lied right to James’ face and said that he does obey all of the Laws of Moses. Paul even went as far as going into the temple and offering the animal sacrifices just to prove to James and the others that he is sincere. The Asian Jews have just revealed Paul’s hidden ministry to all of the Jews at the festival and temple.James now knows the truth and there is nothing Paul can say. !!!!

The infiltration plan of Paul’s has failed miserably!

James knows that Paul is the false prophet that Jesus warned him and the other Disciples about earlier in Matthew 24:

 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show GREAT SIGNS and WONDERS insomuch that, if it“WERE” possible, they shall deceive the very ELECT.MATTHEW 24:23-25

James is not deceived and neither are the “ELECT/CHOSEN” Jews!

In Acts 21: 30 39 James withdraws and leaves this liar to deal with the angry Jewish mobs. The angry mob seizes Paul and starts to beat him unmercifully in the streets. Suddenly the Roman soldiers step in and seize Paul saving him from the hands of the Jewish mob.

Even though the truth has come out about his true intentions Paul attempts to reason with the angry Jews. It is in Acts 22:1-21 that Paul then tries to convince the Jews of his alleged Damascus Road Conversion story. After the Jews hear all of the heinous things that he has done they know he is not one of them and proclaim the following:

And they gave him audience unto this word, and then lifted up their voices, and said, away with such a fellow from the earth: for it is not fit that he should live. ACTS 22:22

To quiet the screams of the crowds Paul is placed in shackles and led away into the castle by the Roman guards. All is now over right? Wrong! It is just beginning…

I am above the law!  I AM A ROMAN! Paul of Tarsus…

Paul is arrested for incensing a riot among the Jews near the Hebrew Temple. In Acts 22 Paul now knows that his infiltration plans have vanished. Seeing no reason to keep up the charade of being “Jewish,” Paul shows his true nature again. He is now a ROMAN!

The Chief Captain commands the Soldiers to bind and whip Paul until he confesses his crimes against the people. Fearful, Paul wants to save his own skin and now decides that he is no longer a filthy “JEW” but instead an honorable and distinguished “ROMAN!”

And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said unto the centurion that stood by, is it lawful for you to scourge a man that is a “ROMAN“ and un-condemned? ACTS 22:25

Since the chances of being accepted by James are totally over Paul decides to pull out his Roman badge of honor before the soldiers can punish him. Paul is not fearful of these soldiers because he knows that no true Roman can be beaten by a lowly civil servant soldier.

Then the Chief Captain came and said unto him, Tell me art thou a“ROMAN?” (HE/(PAUL) SAID YEA)! ACTS 23:27

The Captain doesn’t beat Paul and sets him free. Are you a“JEW“ or are you “ROMAN?“

My Brothers and Sisters as you can see Paul is a Chameleon. He will change his colors, religions or ethnicity whenever it is in HIS best interests!

If it walks like a devil, if it talks like a devil, then it usually is a“DEVIL!”

Paul never feared these soldiers at all because he had gone through this process once before in an earlier chapter of ACTS and acknowledged himself to be a ROMAN there as well:

And the keeper of the prison told this saying to Paul. The magistrates have sent to let you go: now therefore depart, and go in peace. But Paul said unto them, they have beaten us openly uncondemned, BEING ROMANS, and have cast us into prison; and now do they thrust us out privily? Nay verily; but let them come themselves and fetch us out. And the sergeants told these words unto the magistrates: and they feared, when they heard that THEY WERE ROMANS.  And they came and besought them, and brought them out, and desired them to depart out of the city. ACTS16: 36-39

So as you can see Paul is very clever and he knows how to avoid hazardous situations. Let’s get back to the end of the story…

The Roman Captain saves Paul from the hands of the mob. The Jews are outraged that the Roman soldiers have taken Paul from them.

In Acts 24:1-9 Ananias the high priest does not know that Paul was working for the Greco-Romans and goes to the governor to demand custody of Paul. The Governor lets Paul speak in his own defense about the accusations against him:

“Because that thou mayest understand, that there are yet but twelve days since I went up to Jerusalem for to worship. And they neither found me in the temple disputing with any man, neither raising up the people, neither in the synagogues, nor in the city; neither can “they” PROVE the things whereof they now accuse me. ACTS 24:11, 13

Just like he lied to James, once again Paul lies to the Jews and conceals his true Satanic ministry.As we can see Paul is in total denial of his own Gospels. Paul smugly pleads for his freedom because none of his accusers can prove that he was teaching against the Laws of Moses. Guess what? Paul is right on that point because there are no tape recorders or video to show his lies! No one can prove this unless his gospel letters show up or one of the Greeks come and testify, and we know that is not going to happen.

You are not going to believe what Paul says next!

 “But this I CONFESS UNTO THEE that after the way which they call HERESY, SO WORSHIP “I” the God of my fathers, BELIEVING “ALL THINGS” which are written in “THE LAW” and in the Prophets. ACTS 24:14, 15

Can you believe the lies this man will swear to even in a court of law? Paul makes a Solemn Oath and SWEARS in front of the eyes of God and says:

“Oh council I SWEAR TO YOU, the Heresy these men speak about me is untrue! “I worship ONLY the God of our Fathers and I don’t believe that Jesus was the Messiah, I believe and FOLLOW all of the things(CIRCUMCISION INCLUDED) which are written in the LAW? Huh?

Does this man have a conscience at all? How can he stand in the eyesight of God and then swear that he believes and obeys all things which are written in the “Laws of Moses?” We know that this man is a total liar because of verses like the ones below:

  I became as one under the LAW–-THOUGH not being(Myself)under theLAW. 1^ST CORINTHIANS 9:20

 &

 Just remember that God “DOESN’T CARE” whether“WE (EAT) IT OR NOT,” We are “NO WORSE OFF” if WE “DON’T” eat it, and “NO BETTER OFF” if WE “DO” eat it. TYNDALE 1^ST CORINTHIANS 8:8

Is it okay to lie in front of God to save your own life? No! Paul lies over and over again. Now after being captured and facing death Paul abandons his own gospel views of Jesus and claims that he absolutely believes all of the Laws of Moses and that he follows every part of it and every statute:What is your opinion of Paul now?Johnny Cochran couldn’t do a better job of defense than this! According to Paul’s own testimony, we are not under “Grace” but we are still under the Laws of Moses! Did Paul forget his own writings when he claims YHWH made a big mistake and gave us a faulty Law that no one could follow?

 For “IF” the first covenant had been “FAULTLESS”then should no place have been sought for the second.“For finding “FAULT” with them, he saith, Behold, the days come saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah.” HEBREWS 8:7, 8

Clearly this man believed YHWH was a God of errors before his trial. Wouldn’t you expect Satan to confess the very same words?

Total Blasphemy here folks!

So according to Paul YHWH is a faulty God and gave us a law to purposely lead us to Hell. Amazing huh? Paul then goes on to misquote and pervert Jeremiah 31:31 for his own satanic purposes! If this man cannot make up his own mind about who he will serve why should we listen to him at all?

Now remember Paul told us that Jesus allegedly became our last sacrifice! This means he believes no other Mosaic sacrifice was needed. By Paul’s own admission he lies and tells the Council that his original purpose for coming to Jerusalem was to eagerly and willingly offer up Alms and to perform the Purity Animal Sacrifices cleansing rituals in the temple:

Now after many years “I CAME” to bring “ALMS” to my nation, and “OFFERINGS.” ACTS 24:17

As we can see from Paul’s own mouth he did not represent YHWH or Jesus! Now some may say that Paul is saying that he only came to pay taxes and/or to do charity work. That is not true because of the next verse:

Whereupon certain Jews from Asia found me“PURIFIED” in the “TEMPLE”, neither with multitude, nor with tumult. ACTS 24:18

Here we have Paul blaming the Asian Jews for his troubles! Remember it was these Asian Jews that exposed Paul’s treachery to James, the head of the original Disciples. IF Jesus has freed us from the sacrifice then explain why Paul is doing the Purification ritual in the Temple?

When referring back to the beginning of this chapter you will see the reason why Paul was doing the purification ritual. It was only to fool the True Disciples into believing and accepting Paul into the ministry.If Paul really represented God he would have, as he lies about in his gospels, “BOLDLY PROCLAIMED” the Gospel of Jesus Christ had Jesus actually said anything to Paul.We now know that Jesus said nothing to Paul period. Lastly, Paul is arrested and spends two years in jail. After Paul is released he is a beaten and broken man. Two years of imprisonment builds up a lot of animosity and hatred for the Disciples. Paul still knows that there is money to be made in what he is teaching and after his release Paul starts once again preaching his poisonous message to the foreign Jews and Gentiles.

Even though Paul will never be accepted by the true Disciples of Jesus, Paul knows that there is still a chance to reap a financial harvest by claiming to be an Apostle of Jesus. Paul leaves Jerusalem and goes throughout the Gentile countries and converts them to his warped style of Jesus.

Before Paul’s ministry started, the Jewish followers of Jesus were no different from any other Jew. These new converts of Paul needed an exciting new name. Acts 11:26 lets us know where the term Christian really came from. It was from Paul!

And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch. ACTS 11:26

The term: Christian came from the Gentile lands of Paul’s travels. Now you officially know the history of the word Christian. You now know more than your own ministers…

The Disciples of Jesus are known abroad in other countries. Paul knows that the information highway is very slow. No one in the Gentile countries will know that James didn’t trust Paul and that Paul’s true treachery was uncovered in Jerusalem. Paul uses this knowledge to his advantage and preaches throughout the lands. To the lands that are familiar with James and the other Disciples, Paul secretly uses James as a reference to win over the Jewish and Gentile people in the foreign lands. Let’s read the lies of Paul:

And when James, Cephas (Peter) and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision. GALATIANS 2:9

Wow! This man has no conscience at all! The Galatians did not know that Paul was lying. James never gave Paul the right hand of fellowship.

James never commissioned Paul to teach a doctrine exclusively to the Gentiles communities. Paul started teaching the pagan Gentiles because the Asian Jews exposed Paul’s false doctrines to the original Disciples and they no longer wanted anything to do with Him! Paul’s false teaching doctrine became so outrageous that even two of his own followers Silas and Timotheus could no longer accept his lies! Let’s look at the proof of this point directly from the scriptures:

In the beginning of Acts chapter 18 verses 1 thru 4, Paul is teaching the Jews and Greeks his warped gospel version in the synagogue along with another Jewish man by the name of Aquila. Even though you see the word “Greeks” in the verse it does not necessarily mean the Anglo Pagan Greeks. Remember the scripture says that Paul was teaching inside of the actual Synagogues every Sabbath. Pagan Greeks were not permitted into the Holy temples.

So this means that Paul was teaching Grecian Jews in the temple and not the Gentiles. (Remember this point). In verse 4 the scripture lets us know that Paul was not only reasoning and teaching the Jews inside of the temple it says that he was also persuading most of them to his side of thinking. Silas and Timothy come to town and hear what Paul is teaching the Jews and openly opposes Paul’s doctrine:

And when they (Timothy/Silas) opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean; from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles. ACTS 18:6

So as you can see this confrontation between Silas and Timothy was the turning point when Paul separates himself from the Jews. There were many rumors that Paul was teaching against circumcision and against the Laws of Moses. Silas is finally able to hear Paul’s satanic gospels first hand and openly rebukes Paul for teaching a false doctrine inside of the synagogues.Paul is outraged that two of his own converts have opposed him in front of the other Jews. James wouldn’t accept Paul, the other Disciples wouldn’t accept Paul and now two of his own fellow Jews have also rebuked him and his false gospels. Paul get’s angry and says from “Henceforth” which means:

“FROM THIS POINT ON!”

So from that particular point of time and on, Paul decides to denounce Judaism and the true message of Jesus and invents his own doctrines and teaches the world a false gospel that is backed with torture, greed and rape.Paul is free from the Laws of Moses to become the foremost authority of the satanic pagan inspired gospel of the Gentiles which is known today as: Romanized Christianity. Paul is the enemy and adversary of God.  Never let the sons of Satan lead you astray again. Shalom/Salaam…
——————-

Probing Questions that will EXPOSE Paul as a FAKE APOSTLE!

Probing Questions that will EXPOSE Paul as a FAKE APOSTLE!

1. Relating to Revelation 2:1-2

a. Does Paul indeed address those at Ephesus as an “apostle” in Ephesians 1:1?

b.  Rev 2:2 speaks in past tense of this occurrence. Was Paul’s ministry before or after 90AD when the vision of Revelation was given?

c.  How can Paul be a 13th apostle when Revelation 21:14 says there are only twelve?

d. If Paul is a 13th apostle, then why does Jesus tells us in Matthew 19:28 there are only twelve?

e.  If Paul’s apostleship was not in dispute by believers, then why does he defend it in 1st Corinthians 9:1-3?

f.  Why does he speak in 1st Corinthians 9:3 of those who “try” him unless he was “tried” as Rev 2:2 alleges?

g. If Paul was not one whom the Ephesians found to be a liar in Rev 2:2, then why does Paul say in 2nd Timothy 1:15 that “all they which are in Asia have turned away from me.”?

h. If Paul was not called a liar about his apostleship as Rev 2:2 says, then why does he specifically say in 1st Timothy 2:7 he is not lying about his apostleship?

2. If Paul’s words are “holy scriptures”, then why does 2nd Timothy 3:15 say Timothy had been reading them since he was a child? Were Paul’s letters even written when Timothy was a child?

3. If “none are righteous” as Paul universally declares in Romans 3:9-20, then why are the parents of John the Baptist declared “righteous before God” in Luke 1:6?

4. Why does Paul say, “as it is written” in Romans 3:10 and then string together single sentences from no less than six places in the Bible, stringing them together as if they are one statement? Does he truly represent it “as it is written?” Are his conclusions the same as the original?

5. Why does Paul quote the “old testament” at all if it is not authoritative?

6. Part of Paul’s Romans 3:10 quote comes from Psalms 14. If there are “none righteous” including believers as Paul alleges, then why does Psalm 14:5 say, “for God is in the generation of the righteous”? Why would God speak of those who Paul says never existed?

7. If Paul acknowledges being Herodian in Romans 16:11 and Jesus tells me in Mark 8:15 to beware the leaven of Herod, then shouldn’t I obey Jesus and beware the leaven (doctrine) of Paul?

8. If Paul even late in his ministry claims to be a Pharisee in Acts 23:6 and Jesus tells me in Luke 12:1 to beware the leaven of the Pharisees, then shouldn’t I obey Jesus and beware Paul?

9. Paul claimed to have encountered Jesus on the road to Damascus. Jesus told me in Matthew 24:23-27 when someone claims to see him in the desert don’t believe him. Should I take the advice of Jesus and doubt Paul’s story?

10. Paul claimed to have seen Jesus on 1 Cor 15:8. But Jesus told me in John 16:10 that after his ascension “he will be seen no more” and will be seen only on his second coming only.  So should I still believe on Paul testimonies and sermons?

11. Paul in Galatians 1 emphasizes his knowledge comes directly from Jesus and not from man. Jesus says in Matthew 24:23-27 if someone claims to see him in the secret chambers, I should not believe him. Who was telling me the truth?

12. If Paul’s claim in Galatians 2:16 is true, that we are saved by faith only, then why does James refute this in James 2:14-26 calling the author of this doctrine “o vain man” in v.20?

13. If eating meat sacrificed to idols is okay as long as your “weaker brother” is not around as described in 1st Corinthians 8, then why is this practice later described as being hated by Jesus as the “doctrine of Balaam” in Revelation 2:14? Why does Rev 2:20 condemn it when Paul says it’s okay if nobody knows about it?

14. Why did Paul tell the Corinthians idol meat was okay when the New Testament Church council at Jerusalem had specifically listed this as a forbidden practice to New Testament believers in Acts 15:29?

15. When Paul recounted the council at Jerusalem to the Galatians (Gal 2:10), why did Paul ignore the four commands of the Jerusalem council in Acts 15:20 them instead they were only commanded to “remember the poor”?

16. If Paul appeared in Jerusalem in Acts 9:26 after his conversion, then why does he tell the Galatians in 1:18 that he waited three years to go? Why does he assure us in v.20 he is not lying?

17. If the “other gospel” Paul speaks of in Galatians 1:6 was not the very one taught by Peter, James and John, then why does Paul attack the character of these three men in Galatians 2 calling them “those who seemed to be pillars.”?

18. Why did Paul accuse Peter “before them all” when Jesus said in Matthew 18:15-17 to first confront a brother privately, then with two witnesses before going public?

19. Why did Paul criticize Peter for being Jewish around the Jews and Gentile around the Gentiles in Galatians 2:14 when this is precisely what Paul says he himself practices in 1st Corinthians 9:20-22?

20. If the gospel of the circumcision was committed to Paul and the gospel of the Jews to Peter as Paul claims in Galatians 2:7, then why does Peter claim just the opposite in Acts 15:7?

21. Why does Paul, now 17 years into his ministry fear in Galatians 2:3 that he “had run in vain”?

22. If obeying the law is bondage as Paul claims in Galatians 4:9, then why did Jesus tell the man in Mark 10:17 that he must “obey the commandments” to “have eternal life”? Was Jesus trying to bring that man into bondage?

23. If the covenant at Sinai was given to the descendants of Rebecca (Genesis 24:60) and Isaac, then why does Paul try to relate it instead to Hagar in Galatians 4:25?

24. Why did Paul circumcise Timothy in Acts 16:1-3 and then tell him 1) It causes Christ to profit him nothing, 2) He is now a debtor to the whole law and 3) He is fallen from grace in Galatians 5:2-4? Why would Paul do such a terrible thing to Timothy? Did Paul hate Timothy?

25. If God brought the children of Israel to Sinai to put them in bondage to the law as Paul claims in Galatians , then why did he tell them at that time he was bringing them “out of bondage” in Exodus 2:2? Was this some cruel trick God was playing on them?

26. If the law puts is in bondage, why does God say he “redeemed you out of the house of bondage” in Deuteronomy 13:5?

27. If Jesus abolished the law as Paul claims in Ephesians 2:15, then why does Jesus say in Matthew 5:17 that he did not come to destroy the law? Why does Jesus say it will not pass until AFTER heaven and earth have (v.17) passed away? Has that already happened? What does verse 18 say Paul’s place in the kingdom of heaven will be as a result?

28. Paul claims in Romans 11:25, 16:25, 1st Corinthians 2:7, 15:51, Ephesians 1:9, 3:3-9, 6:19, Colossians 1:26-27 2:2, 4:3, 1st Timothy 3:9, 3:16 to have knowledge of mysteries of God revealed only through him. Nobody else confirms these same mysteries. Paul bears witness of himself even though Jesus says he himself could not in John 5:31. Is Paul superior to Jesus?

29. Paul in 2nd Corinthians claims to have three witnesses bearing witness of him. Who is the third of these witnesses in verse 1? Who is the first witness in verse 2? Who is the third witness in verse 3? Didn’t Jesus warn of one who bears witness of himself and comes in his own name (John 5:43)?

30. Paul speaks in Ephesians 6:19 and elsewhere of making known a “mystery of the gospel.” Why wasn’t this mystery shared with the 12 apostles Jesus spent 3 ½ years training?

31. If Paul could be given all knowledge with a single blinding flash, then why did Jesus spend his entire ministry training apostles? Why didn’t he just zap them?

32 Paul says in Philippians 2:7 that Jesus came in the “likeness of men”. Paul claims in Romans 8:3 that Jesus came in the “likeness of sinful flesh.” 1st John says anyone who says that Christ came in something other than flesh is of the spirit of antichrist. This is known in theology as the doctrine of docetism. Why is Paul excused for teaching this doctrine?

33. If the law is a curse as Paul alleges in Galatians 3:10-13, then why should we “establish the law” in Romans 3:31? Does Paul want us to establish a curse?

34. If the “mysteries of God” were revealed through a single man Paul as he claims in Colossians 1:23-26 and elsewhere, then what grounds do we have for rejecting Joseph Smith, Mohammed, the Pope and many others who claim exactly the same thing?

35. If the law was “against us” as Paul claims in Colossians 2:14, then why do Deuteronomy 17:19, Proverbs 6:23 and Proverbs 13:14 say it’s the way to life?

36. Why does Paul say we can do what we want with the Sabbath days in Colossians 2:16 when the Ten Commandments say, “Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy.”?

37. Who has authorized Paul to give new commandments as he does in 1st Thessalonians 4:2?

38. Who is the authority Paul is demanding people to obey in 2nd Thessalonians 3:14?

39. Paul commands in 3:6-7 that we obey the traditions he commands. Did Jesus ever tell us we should obey Paul?

40. Exactly what did Paul do to Hymeneus and Alexander in 1st Timothy 1:20 to deliver them to Satan? Did he kill them? Is it normal behavior for a minister of God to deliver people to Satan?

41. Is Paul’s practice of rebuking before all in 1st Timothy 5:20 consistent with Jesus admonitions in Matthew 18:15-17?

42. Why was Paul seeking a prophet in 1st Corinthians 14:37 to endorse his commands? Is there a prophet on record ever having done so?

43. If the men that were on the Damascus road heard the voice that spoke to Paul in Acts 9:7, then why does Paul change his story in Acts 22:9 saying they didn’t hear it? Is it possible these men refuted his earlier story?

44. Why does Paul claim in Acts 9:10-16 that his mission to the Gentiles was delivered through Ananias but then refute it later saying it was told to him directly by Jesus without going to Damascus later in Acts 26:16-18? Could it be that Ananias refused to support his earlier story and he had to change it?

45. Why does Paul say he is ready to die at Jerusalem in Acts 21:13 and then instead “appeal to Caesar” in Acts 25:11?

46. According to Acts 21:20-21, Paul stood accused by believers in Jesus. That means they believed in his resurrection. Paul was accused by them of teaching believers to forsake the Law of Moses. Why did Paul lie in Acts 23:6 he was being accused instead of believing in the resurrection? Did Jesus ever lie to save his hide like Paul did? Could it be Jesus is the good shepherd (John 10:11) and Paul is the hireling?

47. Why does Paul criticize those who “go to law” before unbelievers instead of with one another in 1st Corinthians 6:1-8, but then “appeal to Caesar” when he is accused by fellow believers (Acts 21:20) in Jesus?

48. Why did Jesus tell the original Apostles to “go unto all nations” in Matthew 28:19 and then take this away from them in Galatians 2 leaving twelve guys to minister to the Jews and only one guy in charge of the Gentiles?

49. Why did Jesus keep his Apostles in the dark about Paul in Matthew 28? Why didn’t he tell them a new guy would be showing up making some changes in the plan?

50. Why did Jesus tell his Apostles in John 15:15 that “all things I have heard from my Father I have made known unto you”, then turn around and send Paul to replace them without telling them first?

51. If Gamaliel encouraged everyone to leave the believers in Jesus alone in Acts 5:34, and if Paul was his student as Paul claims in Acts 22:3, then why was Paul trying to do exactly the opposite as his teacher was teaching?

52. Why would Paul grumble about apostles “chosen of men” in Galatians 1:1 if he did not covet the apostleship given to Mathias in Acts 1:23-26?

53. If the writings of Paul are confusing as 2nd Peter 3:15-16 affirms, then why did the Holy Spirit write confusing things through Paul and not through others?

54. Why does Paul quote the Greek philosopher Philo in Titus 1:12? Does the Holy Spirit quote philosophers as resources?

55. Was Philo’s quote inspired when Philo wrote it, or did it suddenly become inspired when Paul repeated it?

56. Did the Cretan prophet in Titus 1:12 tell the truth or a lie? Please explain.

57. After calling himself an apostle 16 times in Rom 1:1, 11:13, 1st Cor 1:1, 9:1, 9:2, 15:9, 2nd Cor 1:1, 12:12, Gal 1:1, Eph 1:1, Col 1:1, 1Tim 1:1, 1Tim 2:7, 2Tim 1:1, 1:11 and Titus 1:1, why does Paul drop all claims of apostleship when on the hot seat in Jerusalem claiming in Acts 26:16 only to be a “minister and a witness”?

58. The only one of Paul’s churches that is considered a “candlestick” in Revelation 1:11 is the one that is complimented for rejecting him. Coincidence? Where are the Corinthians? The church at Rome? Galatians? Colossians? Considering Revelation 2:5, could it be they lost their candlestick?

59. Why does Paul say in Galatians 4:8-9 that the law was ordained by angels when Exodus 20 clearly says it is given by God?

60. If Jesus says in Matthew 22:38 the law and the prophets hang on two great commandments, why does Paul OMIT the most important one saying in Galatians 5:14 the law is fulfilled in the second one only? (Note, James 2:8 calls “love thy neighbor” the “royal law” without saying it’s the ONLY one.)

61. Deuteronomy 13:1-3 says God will test us with false prophets to see if we love him with all our heart. Could this be true?

Way to Salvation

Way to Salvation According to Jesus!

The message of Jesus was as simple and straight forward as that of all his predecessors as well as that of his successor Muhammed, salla Allah u alihi wa sallam, namely “Believe in God and keep His Commandments”. For the God who inspired His Messengers, is an unvarying God and He is consistent: He is not the “author of confusion” (1 Corinthian14:33).

Jesus was asked TWICE in various occasion concerning SALVATION :

FIRST OCCASION : A law abiding Jew comes to Jesus seeking eternal life or salvation. In the words of Matthew:

“And behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?

…And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? There is none good but one, that is God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Matthew 19:16-17)

You will agree, that if you or I were that Jew, we would infer from these words that, according to Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, salvation was guaranteed, provided we kept the commandments without the shedding of any innocent blood. Unless, of course Jesus was speaking with tongue in cheek; knowing full well that his own “forthcoming redemptive sacrifice”, his “vicarious atonement” (?) for the sins of mankind, was not many days hence.

SECOND OCCASION :  A Lawyer came and asked Jesus about SALVATION ;

Luke 10:25-28 KJV

25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to INHERIT ETERNAL LIFE?

26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?

27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. { Lawyer is reading Deutronomy 6:1-5 }

28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt LIVE.

Why would Jesus give him the impossible solution of keeping the Law (as the Christian alleges) when an easier way was in the offing? 

Or did he not know what was going to happen, that he was to be crucified ? 

Was there not a contract between Father and Son, before the worlds began, for his redeeming blood to be shed? Had he lost his memory? No!!!!!!!

There was no such fairy tale agreement as far as Jesus was concerned. He knew that there is only one way to God, and that is, as Jesus said, “keep the Commandments”!

But INSPITE of this CLEAR wording,  Paulinian Christians willl still stubbornly insist that salvation is through believing in the Paul’s Satanic doctrine : “Blood of redemption of sin”

Jesus (as) was very accurate when he said :

John 10:27 KJV
My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they FOLLOW me:

John 8:43-44 KJV
43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.
44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

John 8:45 KJV
45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

John 8:47 KJV
47 He that is of God heareth God’s words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.

Saul Aka Paul-The False and Self Made Apostle

 

 
1 John 4:3 KJV And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. [ Compare with  Phil 2:7, Rom 8:3, Col 2:9 ]

 

 
Saul The Fake Apostle
 

Jude 1:4 KJV For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

It is a common misconception amongst the Christians that Paul and Jesus’ Disciples were unanimous in their preaching of a crucified Jesus. Christians believe that Paul and the Disciples were preaching the same doctrine and everyone believed in the divine Jesus who came to be crucified for the sins of the world. However, if one carefully examines the bible, that person would see that Paul and the disciples were not preaching the same doctrine and did not believe in the same Jesus (pbuh).

 

Paul The Fake Apostle

Revelation 2:2 KJV I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:

The Apostles in Jerusalem heard that Paul has been preaching a different doctrine in Corinthia and Galatia. Paul was telling them not to follow the law anymore and that they don’t have to eat kosher meat anymore or to be circumcised (according to Genesis 17::14, the covenant is broken if there is no circumcision) etc. So the Apostles went to Galatia and Corinthia and convinced everyone that Paul is wrong, when Paul heard about this he went straight back to the cities.

“I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel”. [Galatians 1:6]

It says different Gospel, so obviously the disciples were teaching them a different doctrine and it was not just minor issues.

The Disciples of Jesus (pbuh) remembered Paul’s persecutions towards the followers (early Christians) of Jesus. They were very suspicious of Paul. So when he finally came to them (41 B.C.E.) they didn’t believe his lie. They looked at him as a spy.

“And when Saul had come to Jerusalem he tried to Join himself with the Disciples but they were all afraid of him. And did not believe that he was a Disciple.” [Acts 9:26]. As you can see the Disciples didn’t trust him.

PAUL IN THE BIBLE ADMITS HE’S A LIAR AND A DECEIVER:

Paul said, “But be it so, I did not burden you nevertheless, being crafty, I CAUGHT YOU WITH GUILE.” [2 CORINTHIANS 12:16]

Definition of GUILE: means ruse, sharp practice, treachery, trickery and wiliness.)

“For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?” [Romans 3:7]

WHAT JESUS IN THE BIBLE SAYS ABOUT THE LIAR:

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.” [John. 8:44-45]

WHAT JESUS SAYS ABOUT THE PHARISEES:

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.” [Matthew 23:15]

PAUL ADMITS HE’S A PHARISEE:

“But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question.” [Acts 23:6]

WHAT JESUS SAYS ABOUT PREACHING TO THE GENTILES:

“Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel.” [Matthew 10:5-6]

“But he Jesus answered and said, “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” [Matthew 15:24]

BUT PAUL SAYS DIFFERENT…WHO GAVE HIM AUTHORITY TO DO THIS?

Paul rejected this command of NOT preaching to the Gentiles, they were restricted. Paul openly preached among the Gentiles, a totally different religion, but then again paul wasn’t one of Jesus’ disciples anyways. The one who was to come for the Gentiles is mentioned in Isaiah 42. Who clearly is an Arab according to the description of his ancestor, “Kedar” and not a Jew Pharisee like Paul who then attempts to deceive many by assuming the role of the respected prophet to come as prophesied.

Paul said,”For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:” [Romans 11:13]

PAUL’S OWN CONTRADICTIONS:

WHEN PAUL WAS ON THE ROAD TO DAMASCUS HE SAW A LIGHT AND HEARD A VOICE. DID THOSE WHO WERE WITH HIM HEAR THE VOICE?

Yes- “And the men which journeyed with me stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.” [Acts 9:7]

No – “And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.” [Acts 22:9]

CONCERNING THE LAW…GOD & JESUS AGAINST PAUL THE LIAR:

THIS IS WHAT GOD SAYS ABOUT HIS LAW:

“Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you”. [Deuteronomy 4:2]

“The laws of God have to be considered and committed to memory for life. They have to be practiced, practiced, practiced. In a way, we have to drill, drill, drill, like a soldier in boot camp, so that they become instinctive behaviors. We have to force ourselves, if need be, to yield to them. This is our part in spiritual circumcision because human nature will put up a fight. It does not want to yield.” [Deut 6:4-7]

“You shall diligently keep the commandments of the LORD your God, and his testimonies and his statutes, which he has commanded you. And you shall do what is right and good in the sight of the LORD, that it may go well with you, and that you may go in and take possession of the good land that the LORD swore to give to your fathers.” [Deuteronomy 6:17-18]

“The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether.” [Psalms 19:79]

THIS IS WHAT JESUS SAYS ABOUT THE LAWS OF GOD:

“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.” [Matthew 5:17-20]

“And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.” [Luke 18:19]

BUT THIS IS WHAT PAUL SAYS ABOUT THE LAW WHICH CLEARLY CONTRADICTS BOTH GOD AND JESUS:

“Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.” [Romans 3:27-28]

“And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.” [Acts 13:39]

“For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.” [Gatatians 3:10-13]

“Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.” And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.” [Galatians 2:16]

PAUL PLAGIARIZED THAT FROM THE TORAH AND HERE IT IS:

“And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree: His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of God;) that thy land be not defiled, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.” [Deuteronomy 21:22-23]

Think about this for one moment. Jesus came to observe and fulfill the law, but Paul said different, Jesus was sinless so therefore this passage should not be ascribed to Jesus. How can someone claim that Jesus was accursed of God and that the law was also a curse when it says different in other places of the Bible? According to Islam, Satan is accursed, not Jesus. Here is the definition of “accursed” so please understand what Paul is teaching in his false doctrine.

ACCURSED: 1. Abominable; hateful: 2. Being under a curse; doomed.

GOD SAYS THAT HIS LAW IS PERFECT NOT A CURSE:

“The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether”. [Psalms 19:79]

PAUL IS THE FALSE PROPHET NO DOUBT ABOUT IT:

“And he shall speak great words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the Most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time”. [Daniel 7:25]

HISTORICAL QUOTES ABOUT PAUL AND HIS DOCTRINE FROM HISTORIANS, PHILOSPORS, AND THEOLOGIANS:

Bishop John S. Spong (Episcopal Bishop of Newark)

“Paul’s words are not the Words of God. They are the words of Paul- a vast difference.”(Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism, p. 104, Harper San Francisco, 1991).

Thomas Jefferson

“Paul was the first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus.” (All references not listed here, can be found in Christianity Betrayed)

Carl Sagan (Scientist; Author)

“My long-time view about Christianity is that it represents an amalgam of two seemingly immiscible parts–the religion of Jesus and the religion of Paul. Thomas Jefferson attempted to excise the Pauline parts of the New Testament. There wasn’t much left when he was done, but it was an inspiring document.” (Letter to Ken Schei [author of Christianity Betrayed])

Albert Schweitzer

“Where possible Paul avoids quoting the teaching of Jesus, in fact even mentioning it. If we had to rely on Paul, we should not know that Jesus taught in parables, had delivered the sermon on the mount, and had taught His disciples the ‘Our Father.’ Even where they are specially relevant, Paul passes over the words of the Lord.”

Wil Durant (Philosopher)

“Paul created a theology of which none but the vaguest warrants can be found in the words of Christ.”

“Fundamentalism is the triumph of Paul over Christ.”

Walter Kaufmann (Professor of Philosophy, Princeton)

“Paul substituted faith in Christ for the Christlike life.”

George Bernard Shaw

“No sooner had Jesus knocked over the dragon of superstition than Paul boldly set it on its legs again in the name of Jesus.”

Thomas Hardy

“The new testament was less a Christiad than a Pauliad.”

Hyam Maccoby (Talmudic Scholar)

“As we have seen, the purposes of the book of Acts is to minimize the conflict between Paul and the leaders of the Jerusalem Church, James and Peter. Peter and Paul, in later Christian tradition, became twin saints, brothers in faith, and the idea that they were historically bitter opponents standing for irreconcilable religious standpoints would have been repudiated with horror. The work of the author of Acts was well done; he rescued Christianity from the imputation of being the individual creation of Paul, and instead gave it a respectable pedigree, as a doctrine with the authority of the so-called Jerusalem Church, conceived as continuous in spirit with the Pauline Gentile Church of Rome. Yet, for all his efforts, the truth of the matter is not hard to recover, if we examine the New Testament evidence with an eye to tell-tale inconsistencies and confusions, rather than with the determination to gloss over and harmonize all difficulties in the interests of an orthodox interpretation.” (The Mythmaker, p.139,Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1986)

Bentham (English Philosopher)

“If Christianity needed an Anti-Christ, they needed look no farther than Paul.” (Paraphrased. Looking for a copy of “Not Paul, but Jesus” in order to retrieve the exact quote.)

LET’S WRAP IT UP!

It’s obvious that Paul’s teachings is not in agreement with the teachings of Jesus, so therefore it is deception at best! Sorry to say but in many cases Christians quote a lot of Paul’s writings so in actualality they follow the teachings of Paul not God’s or Jesus’. Christians please humble yourselves and realise that you’re being deceived and lied to and it is now time to accept Islam and worship only God (Allah) alone in order to achieve true salvation and guidance. Ameen!

May Allah forgive me for any errors on my part, Ameen!

POINT OUT Errors or If there is any Lie We feed from our self….If Any Christian find and please Correct us…!

—————————–

An Article from : http://islamgreatreligion.wordpress.com/2012/12/14/saul-aka-paul-the-false-prophet-and-self-made-apostle/

Another article which complemet this post : http://www.lynxnews.com/content/truth/apostle-paul-liar-part-1

Paul of Tarsus and his Theology opposed to Jesus Christ

Paul of Tarsus & his Theology opposed to Jesus Christ

“Paul’s words are not the Words of God. They are the words of Paul- a vast difference.”

                          -Bishop John S. Spong (Episcopal Bishop of Newark) (Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism, p. 104, Harper San Francisco, 1991)

“Paul was the first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus.”

                          – Thomas Jefferson

Early Christians: 

After ascent of Jesus Christ, the original followers of Jesus Christ continued to live as Jews and practiced what Jesus had taught them. It did not occur to any of them that they could ever be regarded as followers of a new religion.  They were devout and practicing Jews and they were distinguished from their neighbors, only by their faith in the message of Jesus.   In the beginning they did not organize themselves as a separate sect and did not have a synagogue of their own.   There was nothing in the message of Jesus, as understood by them, to necessitate a break with Judaism.

However, they incurred the enmity of the vested interests among the Jewish higher echelon. The conflict between the Jews and the followers of Jesus was started by the Jews because they felt that they [named as Christians much later]would undermine their “authority”. The gulf progressively began to widen. During the siege of Jerusalem in 70 C.E, they left the city; and refused to take part in the Bar Coachaba rebellion in 132 C.E. These two events brought to the surface the difference between the followers of Jesus Christ and the Jews.

Question of Origin of Jesus & Nature:

The question of the origin of Jesus, his nature and relation to God, which later became so important, was not raised among these early disciples. The belief that Jesus was a man super-naturally endowed by God was accepted without question. Nothing in the words of Jesus or the events in his life led them to modify this view. According to Aristides, one of the earliest apologists, the worship of the early Christians was more purely monotheistic even than of the Jews.

Impale’ment of New Disciple Paul:

With the conversion of Paul (4–64 C.E) a new period opened in Christian Theology. Paul a Jew and an inhabitant of Tarsus, had spent a long time in Rome, he was a Roman citizen. He realized the strong hold which the Roman religion had on the masses. The intellectuals were under the influence of Plato and Aristotle. Paul seems to have felt that it would not be possible to convert the masses in the Roman Empire without making mutual adjustments. But his practical wisdom was not acceptable to those who had seen and heard Jesus. However, in spite of their difference, they decided to work together for the common cause.

The theory of redemption was the brain child of Paul, a belief entirely unknown to the disciples of Jesus. Paul’s theory involved the deification of Jesus. The Pauline period in the history of the Christian Church saw a change of scene and principles. In place of the disciples, who had sat at the feet of Jesus, a new figure, who had not known Jesus, had come to the forefront. In place of Palestine, the Roman Empire became the scene of Christian activity.Instead of being a mere sect of Judaism, Christianity not only became independent of Judaism but also became independent of Jesus himself.

Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) presented a spiritual message and main ideas concerning human conduct. Christian theology, however, was shaped principally by the work of Paul who added new doctrines and the worship of Jesus Christ to the spiritual message of Jesus. Paul became the foremost proselytizer of the new religion of Christianity. His influence on Christian theology proved to be the most permanent and far-reaching of all Christian writers and thinkers. As a young man, he went to Jerusalem to study under Rabbi Gamaliel, an eminent Jewish teacher. Though Paul was in Jerusalem at the same time as Jesus, it is doubtful whether the two men ever met.

After Jesus, the early Christians were regarded as heretics and suffered persecution. For a while, Paul (Saul) himself participated in this persecution (Acts:7:58). However, during a journey to Damascus (37 C.E) he claimed that Jesus spoke to him in a ‘vision’,  [as did David Koresh and Jim Jones] so he was converted to the new faith. It was the turning point of his life. The one-time opponent of Christianity became the most vigorous and influential proponent of the new religion.

In 40 A D, he went to Jerusalem, but the disciples were afraid of him. It was Barnabas, one of the earliest disciples of Jesus Christ, who introduced him to them, and convinced them to accept him as a Christian, even though reluctantly. After some time he had again to flee from Jerusalem to Tarsus to save his life. Barnabas was sent by the apostles on a special and important mission to Antioch. Barnabas brought Paul from Tarsus so that he might help him in his mission at Antioch; and both of them worked there for a whole year. All this time Saul (Paul) was subordinate to Barnabas.

During the first missionary journey (45 C.E to 49 C.E) Barnabas was the leader of the mission. It was indeed the missionary journey of Barnabas which is erroneously ascribed to Paul. Paul was planning to bypass all the disciples and even his benefactor, Barnabas, and to gain pre-eminence for himself. He wanted to be second to none.

Paul under Satanic influence:According to 2 Corinthians 12:6-9, Paul, in the Bible says:
“But I refrain, so no one will think more of me than is warranted by what I do or say,  or because of these surpassingly great revelations. Therefore, in order to keep me from becoming conceited, I was given a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan, to torment me.  Three times I pleaded with the Lord to take it away from me.  But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ’s power may rest on me.” -2 Corinthians 12:6-9

”According to ‘Saint’ Paul, God sent a Messenger of Satan to teach him the reality of grace. If it is a Messenger from God,why then, does Paul call it a Messenger of Satan?

Since it is from God, shouldn’t it be a Messenger of God? Since Paul calls Messengers sent by Christ to teach him grace, Satan, and since Paul is tormented and Christ is unwilling to remove the ‘Messenger of Satan’, then we must conclude that Paul was a man possessed by some demon.
Devil tempted Adam, Eve got them out of gardens of bliss , tempted Jesus Christ but was rebuked:

“Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.”[Matthew 4:10]

The disappointed Satan later got Paul in vision [as did David Koresh and Jim Jones] and possessed him. The dubious VISION of Paul and conversion story  is exposed due to conflicting account at Act, chapters 9,22 & 26.

Journal of Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry:

Research Article: St Paul and temporal lobe epilepsy. D Landsborough

Abstract: Evidence is offered to suggest a neurological origin for Paul’s ecstatic visions. Paul’s physical state at the time of his conversion is discussed and related to these ecstatic experiences. It is postulated that both were manifestations of temporal lobe epilepsy. 

Paul converted by epileptic fit, suggests BBC:

A documentary about St Paul has infuriated Christians by suggesting that the apostle’s conversion on the road to Damascus may have been caused by an epileptic fit or a freak lightning bolt. In one of the Bible’s most dramatic stories, Paul was transformed from a zealous persecutor of Christianity into one of its most powerful advocates after being struck down by a blinding light. The documentary, presented by Jonathan Edwards, the athlete and evangelical. It challenges the belief that Paul’s conversion was caused by divine intervention by quoting scientists who link religious experience with epilepsy. It suggests that the Paul’s reference to an ailment which he described as “a thorn in the flesh, which acts as Satan’s messenger to beat me, and keep me from being proud” could be the condition.

Professor Vilayanur Ramachandran, the neuro scientist who delivered this year’s Reith lectures, told the programme that patients who suffered seizures often had intense mystical experiences like Paul’s.

An even more bizarre theory, suggested by Dr John Derr, an American earthquake expert, is that Paul could have been struck by a bolt of electro-magnetic energy, similar to ball lightning, released by an earthquake.

The programme quotes scientists saying that such an event could have triggered what Paul would believe to be a mystical experience, as well as leaving him blind for several days. Paul’s conversion is thought to have occurred around AD 35, and his apostolic journeys took place from AD 47 until he was arrested in Jerusalem in AD 58. According to tradition he was beheaded in Rome.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1427916/St-Paul-converted-by-epileptic-fit-suggests-BBC.html

Then the influence of Messenger of Satan, resulted in such doctrines which Jesus Chrsit never preached, he said:
Matthew 7:21-26:  \

“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Master, Master ‘ [Greek:kurios, master, as a respectful title, Lord, sir] will enter into the Kingdom of Heaven; but he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will tell me in that day, ‘Master, master didn’t we prophesy in your name, in your name cast out demons, and in your name do many mighty works?’ Then I will tell them, ‘I never knew you. Depart from me, you who work iniquity.‘ “Everyone therefore who hears these words of mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man, who built his house on a rock. The rain came down, the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat on that house; and it didn’t fall, for it was founded on the rock. Everyone who hears these words of mine, and doesn’t do them will be like a foolish man, who built his house on the sand.”

“For this people’s heart has become calloused; they hardly hear with their ears, and they have closed their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn, and I would heal them.” [Matthew 13:15]

“But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand” [Matthew 7:26]
“And He said to them, “Rightly did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written: ‘THIS PEOPLE HONORS ME WITH THEIR LIPS, BUT THEIR HEART IS FAR AWAY FROM ME. ‘And in vain they pay reverence [Greeksebomai sebomai, revere, worship, adore] to me as they teach doctrines of commandments of the sons of men.’ “Neglecting the commandment of God, you hold to the tradition of men.”  [Mark 7:6-10]

“For if someone comes to you and preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the Spirit you received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough.”[2 Corinthians 11:4]

These arguments should silence the missionary and create awareness in their hearts to follow true teachings of Jesus Christ not of the Paul.

Council of Jerusalem (50C.E):

It was experienced by the preachers that the gentiles were reluctant to convert, because some ignorant people had advocated that to attain salvation it is obligatory that in addition to believing in Jesus Christ they have to also adhere to all the rites and customs of Law of Moses like circumcision in accord with Genesis 17:14, a law from God which, according to Genesis 17:13-19, God said would be everlasting) thus Luke wrote: “And certain men came down from Judea and taught the brethren, saying, Except you be circumcised after the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.”(Acts;15:1).

However, circumcision was considered repulsive during the period of Hellenization of the Eastern Mediterranean. So if the potential convert is asked to believe in the basic doctrines without precondition of circumcision it does not imply that the custom of circumcision is cancelled for all but a minor evil is accepted to save the gentiles from disbelief. This compromise technique was adopted by the disciples to facilitate the conversion of gentiles. A delegation, comprising Paul and Barnabas, was appointed to confer with the elders of the church in Jerusalem on this issue.

Relaxation of Law to Facilitate Gentiles Conversion-Not Permanent Abrogation:

In the conference of the Christian Apostles held in Jerusalem around 50 C.E, the ensuing apostolic conference(Acts;15:2-35), led by the apostle Peter and James, were persuaded to relax the adherence of Law for the Gentile Christians.  After debate, it was decreed that Gentile Christians did not have to observe the Mosaic Law of the Jews. The general intention of disciples is evident from the speech delivered by Peter: “Now therefore why test God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.”(Acts;15:10-11). [If Peter’s aim was to totally cancel the Law for the gentiles, then it would also been cancelled for the Jewish Christians, because Peter considers the Law as burden for the gentiles as well as the for themselves (Jews)]

It may be kept in view that the purpose of the Council of Jerusalem was not to determine whether the Law of Torah is obligatory for the gentiles or not? The in-depth analysis indicates that as far as the viability of the Law of Torah is concerned the disciples had no doubt in their mind, they all agreed to the obligation to adhere to these laws: The issue was only to relax them for the gentiles to facilitate their conversion. For this reason while describing those who wanted the gentiles to adhere to the Law, Luke wrote: “But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees who believed, saying, It is needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.”(Acts;15:5). In response James decreed: “Therefore my judgment is, that we trouble not them, who from among the Gentiles are turned to God: But that we write unto them, that they abstain from defilements of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood. For Moses of old time has in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every Sabbath day.”(Acts;15:19-21). Hence the general letter written by this Council to the gentiles states: “For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things; That you abstain from anything offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if you keep yourselves, you shall do well. Farewell.”(Acts;15:28-29)

It is amply clear from above that the disciples of Jesus Christ did not intend to cancel or abrogate the Law of Torah altogether but compromised on its application for gentiles (Not Jewish Christians) temporarily to facilitate easy conversion of gentiles from paganism to the new faith. However when Barnabas and Paul reached Antioch, Paul took undue advantage of the Decree of the Jerusalem Council and started preaching that the Law of Torah has been abrogated completely: “For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.”(Galatians;2:19) and later: “But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.”(Romans;7:6).

Barnabas & Paul-Split on Doctrinal Differences:

Obviously acceptance of self made doctrines by Paul, implied total deviation from the teachings of Jesus Christ, who had said: “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.”(Matthew;5:17). Hence Peter and Barnabas opposed Paul, which has been mentioned by Paul: “But when Peter came to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed. For before certain men came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them who were of the circumcision. And the other Jews joined likewise with him; so that Barnabas also was carried away with their hypocrisy.”(Galatians;2:11-13).

After this incidence Barnabas separated himself fro Paul: “Paul also and Barnabas continued in Antioch, teaching and preaching the word of the Lord, with many others also. And some days later Paul said unto Barnabas, Let us go again and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the Lord, and see how they do. And Barnabas determined to take with them John, whose surname was Mark. But Paul thought it not good to take him with them, who departed from them from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work. And the contention was so sharp between them, that they departed asunder one from the other: and so Barnabas took Mark, and sailed unto Cyprus; And Paul chose Silas, and departed, being commended by the brethren unto the grace of God. And he went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.”(Acts;15:35-41).

There was strong opposition by the disciples (Peter and Barnabas,) to the new doctrines being preached by Paul contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ. This resulted in to rebellion by the Galatians against Paul. Then Paul wrote 2^nd letter to Galatians, in which he instead of claiming support of Disciples, opposed them and tried to prove that he did not need to learn from Disciples as he was getting direct revelations (Glatinas:1:11-12).

After this rift, there was a parting of the ways. In the Acts, Barnabas disappears after the rift, because the recording of the Acts of the Apostles was done by the followers of Paul. Pauline Christians grew in number and strength because Paul had compromised with Roman beliefs and legends. A stage was later reached when kings were used as pawns to further the ends of the Church. However Barnabas was able to record the original teachings of Jesus Christ which remains available to the truth seekers even now despite all the malicious efforts to obliterate them. Commandment of Jesus about Barnabas is: “If he (Barnabas) comes un to you, receive him”(Clossians;4:10)

In the ‘Opening’ of “The Gospel of Jesus” Barnabas clarifies the doctrinal differences as reason of his split with Paul:

“True Gospel of Jesus, called Christ, a new prophet sent by God to the world: according to the description of Barnabas his apostle: Barnabas, apostle of Jesus the Nazarene, called Christ, to all them that dwell upon the earth desireth peace and consolation. Dearly beloved the great and wonderful God hath during these past days visited us by his prophet Jesus Christ in great mercy of teaching and miracles, by reason whereof many, being deceived of Satan, under presence of piety, are preaching most impious doctrine, calling Jesus son of God, repudiating the circumcision ordained of God for ever, and permitting every unclean meat: among whom also Paul hath been deceived, whereof I speak not without grief; for which cause I am writing that truth which I have seen and heard, in the intercourse that I have had with Jesus, in order that ye may be saved, and not be deceived of Satan and perish in the judgment of God. Therefore beware of every one that preacheth unto you new doctrine contrary to that which I write, that ye may be saved eternally. The great God be with you and guard you from Satan and from every evil. Amen.”

Paul arrived in Jerusalem on his fifth and final visit to Jerusalem [Acts 21:17] in 57 with a collection of money for the community there. Acts reports that he was warmly received. But Acts goes on to recount how Paul was warned by James and the elders that he was gaining a reputation for being against the Law, “teaching all the Jews living among the gentiles to forsake Moses, and that you tell them not to circumcise their children or observe the customs”.[Acts 21:21] Paul underwent a purification ritual in order to give the Jews no grounds to bring accusations against him for not following their law. Paul caused a stir when he appeared at the Temple, and he escaped being killed by the crowd by voluntarily being taken into Roman custody. When a plot to kill Paul on his way to an appearance before the Jews was discovered, he was transported by night to Caesarea. He was held as a prisoner there for two years, until a new governor reopened his case in 59. When the governor suggested that he be sent back to Jerusalem for further trial, Paul exercised his right as a Roman citizen to “appeal unto Caesar”.

Acts 21:17-36

When we arrived at Jerusalem, the brothers and sisters received us warmly. The next day Paul and the rest of us went to see James, and all the elders were present. 19Paul greeted them and reported in detail what God had done among the Gentiles through his ministry.

20When they heard this, they praised God. Then they said to Paul: “You see, brother, how many thousands of Jews have believed, and all of them are zealous for the law. 21They have been informed that you teach all the Jews who live among the Gentiles to turn away from Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or live according to our customs. 22What shall we do? They will certainly hear that you have come, 23so do what we tell you. There are four men with us who have made a vow. 24Take these men, join in their purification rites and pay their expenses, so that they can have their heads shaved. Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law. 25As for the Gentile believers, we have written to them our decision that they should abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality.”

26The next day Paul took the men and purified himself along with them. Then he went to the temple to give notice of the date when the days of purification would end and the offering would be made for each of them.

Paul Arrested

27When the seven days were nearly over, some Jews from the province of Asia saw Paul at the temple. They stirred up the whole crowd and seized him, 28shouting, “Fellow Israelites, help us! This is the man who teaches everyone everywhere against our people and our law and this place. And besides, he has brought Greeks into the temple and defiled this holy place.” 29(They had previously seen Trophimus the Ephesian in the city with Paul and assumed that Paul had brought him into the temple.)

30The whole city was aroused, and the people came running from all directions. Seizing Paul, they dragged him from the temple, and immediately the gates were shut. 31While they were trying to kill him, news reached the commander of the Roman troops that the whole city of Jerusalem was in an uproar. 32He at once took some officers and soldiers and ran down to the crowd. When the rioters saw the commander and his soldiers, they stopped beating Paul.

33The commander came up and arrested him and ordered him to be bound with two chains. Then he asked who he was and what he had done. 34Some in the crowd shouted one thing and some another, and since the commander could not get at the truth because of the uproar, he ordered that Paul be taken into the barracks. 35When Paul reached the steps, the violence of the mob was so great he had to be carried by the soldiers. 36The crowd that followed kept shouting, “Get rid of him!”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Christianity Betrayed by Paul

One of Paul’s followers (Demetrius) left Paul and sided with the Original Apostles and their followers. Paul admits that Demetrius was one of his followers and that he deserted Paul (2Tim 4:9-16). Paul’s friend Luke tries to put a favorable spin to the story (Acts 19:23-29), but John defends Demetrius against Luke’s attack (3 John 9-12).

Adding weight to this argument, is the story of Barnabas. Barnabas was the one who first introduced Paul to the Original Apostles, and he accompanied Paul on Paul’s first missionary journey. Barnabas was also one of the many of Paul’s followers who (according to Paul’s own words) eventually had a parting of the ways with their former leader:

    “No one stood by me when I defended myself; all deserted me.”

    (2 Tim 4:16)

The situation with Barnabas is very similar to that of Demetrius, and is even more convincing. Once again we have Paul admit that one of his followers has left him. Once again we find Luke attempting a feat of “damage control” and attempting to reframe the story in a more positive light for his friend Paul. In this case, however, we do not have to use a third party to infer that the follower who is deserting Paul is going over to the side of the Original Apostles and their followers (the Ebionites). Here, this fact is attested to by none other than Paul himself!

First, let us look at the highly imaginative presentation of the split between Paul and Barnabas as brought to us by Paul’s constant defender, Luke:

“Some time later Paul said to Barnabas, ‘Let us go back and visit our brothers in every town where we preached the word of the Lord, and let us find out how they are getting along.’ Barnabas wanted to take John Mark with them, but Paul did not think it was right to take him, because he had not stayed with them to the end of their mission, but had turned back and left them at Pamphylia. There was a sharp argument, and they separated:”(Acts 15:36-39)

A sharp argument and separation over whether or not to take Barnabas’ nephew with them on a journey? This would seem to indicate a rather weak bond between Paul and Barnabas. Their history together, however, seems to argue against this assumption:

The friendship of Paul and Barnabas was formed right from the start, with Barnabas being the first (and perhaps the only) person to support Paul when Paul initially met with the Original Apostles.

    “Saul went to Jerusalem and tried to join the disciples. But they would not believe that he was a disciple, and they were all afraid of him. Then Barnabas came to his help and took him to the apostles. He explained to them how Saul had seen the Lord on the road and that the Lord had spoken to him. He also told them how boldly Saul had preached in the name of Jesus in Damascus. And so Saul stayed in Jerusalem, preaching boldly in the name of the Lord.” (Acts 9:26-28)

Even before their first journey, Paul and Barnabas worked together “for a whole year.”

    “Then Barnabas went to Tarsus to look for Saul. When he found him, he took him to Antioch, and for a whole year the two met with the people of the church and taught a large group.”(Acts 11:25-26)

According to Luke, Paul and Barnabas were placed together not only by their own choice, but by the decree of the Holy Spirit.

    “In the church at Antioch there were some prophets and teachers: Barnabas, Simeon (called the Black), Lucius (from Cyrene), Manaen (who had been brought up with Governor Herod), and Saul. While they were serving the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said to them, ‘Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul, to do the work to which I have called them.’” (Acts 13:1-2)

Paul and Barnabas travelled extensively and underwent many hardships together.

    “Having been sent by the Holy Spirit, Barnabas and Saul went to Seleucia and sailed from there to the island of Cyprus…..they arrived at Salamis…..went all the way across the island of Paphos…..came to Perga, a city in Pamphylia…..arrived in Antioch in Pisidia…..went on to Iconium…..fled to the cities of Lystra and Derbe in Lycaonia and to the surrounding territory…..then they went back to Lystra, to Iconium, and on to Antioch in Pisidia…..They came to Pamphylia. There they preached the message in Perga and then went back to Attalia, and from there they sailed back to Antioch, the place where they had been commanded to the care of God’s grace for the work they had now completed.” (Acts 13 & 14)

After all of the time and travails that are shared by Paul and Barnabas, they have a violent argument and part company forever—if we believe the presentation in Acts—over an event that is given the following coverage by Luke in Acts:

    “Paul and his companions sailed from Paphos and came to Perga, a city in Pamphylia, where John Mark left them and went back to Jerusalem.”(Acts 13:13)

According to the account found in Acts, we are to believe that two men who shared a common bond of faith and friendship; shared travels and travails; and who were placed together for a shared role by the Holy Spirit, argued and separated forever over the fact that Barnabas’ nephew “went back to Jerusalem.” Here we are to believe that Paul is of such a mind as to throw away a friendship such as the one between Barnabas and himself rather than to allow Barnabas the privilege of having his nephew accompany them on a second journey. Not exactly a sterling view of Paul as presented by his friend Luke, but Luke evidently felt that it was better than the alternative of letting Paul’s own version of the split stand as it was presented in Paul’s letter to the Galatians:

    “But when Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him in public, because he was clearly wrong. Before some men who had been sent by James arrived there, Peter had been eating with the Gentile brothers. But after these men arrived, he drew back and would not eat with the Gentiles, because he was afraid of those who were in favor of circumcising them. The other Jewish brothers also started acting like cowards along with Peter: AND EVEN BARNABAS WAS SWEPT ALONG BY THEIR COWARDLY ACTION.” (Gal 2:11-13)

Here we see what was actually the reason for the split between Paul and Barnabas. We may not ever know the true story of the confrontation between Paul and the Original Apostles (Peter and James and their followers [the Ebionites]). We hear Paul’s side here in Galatians, we hear Peter condemning Paul’s version. Regardless of the actual details of the confrontation, we find Barnabas siding with Peter and the Original Apostles against Paul. A much more likely cause for the split between the two former friends than the unconvincing excuse utilized by Luke in Acts.

So, once again, we find evidence that when confronted by the reasoning of those who had actually travelled with and learned from Jesus during his ministry, many of Paul’s followers recognized the truth of the teaching of these eye-witnesses and turned away from Paul and his mistaken version of the religion of Jesus. Had Jerusalem not fallen in 70 AD, and had the Ebionites not been scattered and deprived of a home base from which to battle the apostate views of Paul, we might well have seen the religion of Jesus passed on by those to whom he had delivered his teaching. Alas, Jerusalem did fall, and Paul’s distorted view was allowed to go on unchallenged by those who best knew Jesus and his wishes. What a different world it might have been without this cruel twist of fate.

Source: http://www.atheists-for-jesus.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Pauline Theology – 3 Main Conflicts with that of Jesus

One may wonder what, from the New Testament, separates two groups, Trinitarians from Unitarians by such a vast expanse of understanding.  No doubt the key difference which divides Trinitarians from Unitarians, and Christians from Muslims, is Pauline theology.  For centuries the argument has been put forth that Trinitarian Christians largely follow Pauline theology more than that of Jesus.  This charge is difficult to deny, for Jesus taught the Law of the Old Testament, whereas Paul preached mysteries of faith, in denial of the Law which the prophets had suffered and struggled to convey.  In disrespect to thousands of years of revelation conveyed through a long chain of esteemed prophets, and contrary to the teachings of the rabbi Jesus himself, Paul focused not on the life and teachings of Jesus, but upon his death.

The three main points where Pauline theology conflicts with that of Jesus are critical —

elements so crucial that deviation from the truth threatens a person’s salvation.  In order of importance they rank:1)    The divinity of Jesus alleged by Pauline theology versus the oneness of God taught by Christ Jesus;2)    Justification by faith, as proposed by Paul, versus Old Testament law, as endorsed by Christ Jesus;

3)    Jesus having been a universal prophet, as per Paul, versus an ethnic prophet, as per the teachings of Christ Jesus.

Christ Jesus was one more prophet in the long line of prophets sent to guide the astray Israelites.  As Christ Jesus so clearly affirmed, “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”  (Matthew 15:24)  When Jesus sent the disciples out in the path of God, he instructed them in such a manner as to leave no uncertainty in this regard, for he told them, “Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans.  But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”  (Matthew 10:5-6)  Throughout his ministry, Jesus was never recorded as having converted a single Gentile, and in fact is recorded as having initially rebuked a Gentile for seeking his favors, likening her to a dog (Matthew 15:22-28 and Mark 7:25-30).  One wonders, what does that mean now, for those who have taken Jesus to be their ‘personal savior’ and presume to speak in his name?

Interestingly enough, these three points constitute the greatest doctrinal differences separating Christianity not only from Judaism, but also from Islam.  Running a theological finger down the backbone of revealed monotheism, Trinitarian Christianity seems to stand out of joint.

To address the first of these points, Jesus is recorded as having taught the oneness of God, as in Mark 12:29:

“Jesus answered him, ‘The first of all the commandments is: “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.”  Jesus reportedly continued with “And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength,” finishing with emphasis upon the initial claim, “This is the first commandment.” (Mark 12:30).  Not only did Jesus stress importance by sandwiching his statement between the repeated and emphatic “This is the first commandment,” but the importance of this teaching is equally stressed in Matthew 22:37 and Luke 10:27, and further complemented by the first commandment as recorded in Exodus 20:3 — “You shall have no other gods before Me.”  Jesus conveyed the above teaching from Deuteronomy 6:4-5 (as acknowledged in all reputable Biblical commentaries), yet Pauline theology somehow arrived at concepts which have been extrapolated to support what is now known as the Trinity.  One wonders how.  Jesus referred to the Old Testament — what did the Pauline theologians refer to?  Significantly absent from the above teaching of Jesus is the association of himself with God.  There never was a better time or place, throughout the New Testament, for Jesus to have claimed partnership in divinity, were it true.  But he didn’t.  He didn’t say, “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one — but it’s not quite that simple, so let me explain…” [By Dr.Lawrence Brorwn: http://www.islamreligion.com/articles/564/]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Views of scholars and statesmen on Paul & His Theology:

Lehmann put it:

“The only thing which Paul considers important is the Jew Jesus’ death, which destroyed all hopes of liberation by a Messiah.  He makes the victorious Christ out of the failed Jewish Messiah, the living out of the dead, the son of God out of the son of man.”

More than a few scholars consider Paul the main corrupter of Apostolic Christianity and of the teachings of Jesus:

“What Paul proclaimed as ‘Christianity’ was sheer heresy which could not be based on the Jewish or Essene faith, or on the teaching of Rabbi Jesus.  But, as Schonfield says, ‘The Pauline heresy became the foundation of Christian orthodoxy and the legitimate church was disowned as heretical.’”

Lehmann continues:

“Paul did something that Rabbi Jesus never did and refused to do.  He extended God’s promise of salvation to the Gentiles; he abolished the law of Moses, and he prevented direct access to God by introducing an intermediary.”

Others elevate Paul to sainthood.  Joel Carmichael, who commented as follows, very clearly is not one of them:

“We are a universe away from Jesus.  If Jesus came “only to fulfill” the Law and the Prophets; If he thought that “not an iota, not a dot” would “pass from the Law,” that the cardinal commandment was “Hear, O Israel, the Lord Our God, the Lord is one,” and that “no one was good but God”….What would he have thought of Paul’s handiwork!  Paul’s triumph meant the final obliteration of the historic Jesus; he comes to us embalmed in Christianity like a fly in amber.”

Many authors have pointed out the disparity in the teachings of Paul and Jesus; the best of them have avoided opinionated commentary and concentrated on simply exposing the elements of difference.  Dr. Wrede comments:

“In Paul the central point is a divine act, in history but transcending history, or a complex of such acts, which impart to all mankind a ready-made salvation.  Whoever believes in these divine acts – the incarnation, death, and resurrection of a celestial being, receives salvation.

“And this, which to Paul is the sum of religion – the skeleton of the fabric of his piety, without which it would collapse – can this be a continuation or a remoulding of the gospel of Jesus?  Where, in all this, is that gospel to be found, which Paul is said to have understood?

“Of that which is to Paul all and everything, how much does Jesus know?  Nothing whatever.”

And Dr. Johannes Weiss contributes:

“Hence the faith in Christ as held by the primitive churches and by Paul was something new in comparison with the preaching of Jesus; it was a new type of religion.”

Carl Sagan (Scientist; Author)

    “My long-time view about Christianity is that it represents an amalgam of two seemingly immiscible parts–the religion of Jesus and the religion of Paul. Thomas Jefferson attempted to excise the Pauline parts of the New Testament. There wasn’t much left when he was done, but it was an inspiring document.” (Letter to Ken Schei [author of Christianity Betrayed and An Atheists for Jesus])

Thomas Jefferson

    “Paul was the first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus.”

Albert Schweitzer

    “Where possible Paul avoids quoting the teaching of Jesus, in fact even mentioning it. If we had to rely on Paul, we should not know that Jesus taught in parables, had delivered the sermon on the mount, and had taught His disciples the ‘Our Father.’ Even where they are specially relevant, Paul passes over the words of the Lord.”

Wil Durant (Philospher)

    “Paul created a theology of which none but the vaguest warrants can be found in the words of Christ.”

    “Fundamentalism is the triumph of Paul over Christ.”

Walter Kaufmann (Professor of Philosophy, Princeton)

    “Paul substituted faith in Christ for the Christlike life.”

George Bernard Shaw

    “No sooner had Jesus knocked over the dragon of superstition than Paul boldly set it on its legs again in the name of Jesus.”

Thomas Hardy

    “The new testament was less a Christiad than a Pauliad.”

Hyam Maccoby (Talmudic Scholar)

    “As we have seen, the purposes of the book of Acts is to minimize the conflict between Paul and the leaders of the Jerusalem Church, James and Peter. Peter and Paul, in later Christian tradition, became twin saints, brothers in faith, and the idea that they were historically bitter opponents standing for irreconcilable religious standpoints would have been repudiated with horror. The work of the author of Acts was well done; he rescued Christianity from the imputation of being the individual creation of Paul, and instead gave it a respectable pedigree, as a doctrine with the authority of the so-called Jerusalem Church, conceived as continuous in spirit with the Pauline Gentile Church of Rome. Yet, for all his efforts, the truth of the matter is not hard to recover, if we examine the New Testament evidence with an eye to tell-tale inconsistencies and confusions, rather than with the determination to gloss over and harmonize all difficulties in the interests of an orthodox interpretation.” (The Mythmaker, p. 139, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1986)

Jeremy Bentham (English Philosopher)

    “If Christianity needed an Anti-Christ, they needed look no farther than Paul.” (Paraphrased. Looking for a copy of “Not Paul, but Jesus” in order to retrieve the exact quote.)

Carl Jung (Psychologist)

    “Paul hardly ever allows the real Jesus of Nazareth to get a word in.” (U.S. News and World Report, April 22, 1991, p. 55)

Bishop John S. Spong (Episcopal Bishop of Newark)

“Paul’s words are not the Words of God. They are the words of Paul- a vast difference.” (Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism, p. 104, Harper San Francisco, 1991)

*********************************************************************************************

Source :http://bible-pedia.blogspot.com/2013/08/christianity-of-paul-no-jesus.html